Suppr超能文献

基于形态学差异、三甲氧苯乙胺含量和 trnL/trnF 序列对佩奥特掌和 Lophophora diffusa 的鉴定。

Peyote identification on the basis of differences in morphology, mescaline content, and trnL/trnF sequence between Lophophora williamsii and L. diffusa.

机构信息

Medicinal Plant Garden, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health, 21-1 Nakajima-cho, Kodaira, Tokyo 187-0033, Japan.

出版信息

J Nat Med. 2011 Jan;65(1):103-10. doi: 10.1007/s11418-010-0469-7. Epub 2010 Oct 2.

Abstract

Genus Lophophora (Cactaceae) has two species: Lophophora williamsii Coulter, which is called peyote, and L. diffusa Bravo. Although it was reported that L. williamsii contained mescaline and L. diffusa did not, we found L. williamsii specimens that did not contain mescaline. This finding indicated that the two species could not be differentiated in terms of mescaline content. Moreover, the relationship between mescaline content and morphology of the two species is also unknown. In this study, we attempted to clarify the difference in morphology, mescaline content, and DNA alignment of the chloroplast trnL/trnF region between L. williamsii and L. diffusa. As a result, L. williamsii specimens were classified into two groups. Group 1 had small protuberances on the epidermis, contained mescaline, and the analyzed region on the trnL/trnF sequence was 881 base pairs (bp) long in all except one (877 bp). Group 2 had large protuberances on the epidermis, did not contain mescaline, and the analyzed region was 893 bp long. On the other hand, L. diffusa had medium-sized protuberances on the epidermis, did not contain mescaline, and the analyzed region was 903 bp long. Also investigated was the potential application of the PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) method as a means of identification based on the trnL/trnF sequence. By applying the PCR-RFLP method, the two species could be distinguished and L. williamsii specimens could be differentiated into group 1 and group 2.

摘要

龙舌兰属(仙人掌科)有两个物种:Lophophora williamsii Coulter,俗称佩奥特碱,和 L. diffusa Bravo。虽然有报道称 L. williamsii 含有三甲氧苯乙胺,而 L. diffusa 则不含,但我们发现了不含三甲氧苯乙胺的 L. williamsii 标本。这一发现表明,这两个物种不能根据三甲氧苯乙胺的含量来区分。此外,这两个物种的三甲氧苯乙胺含量与形态之间的关系也不清楚。在这项研究中,我们试图阐明 L. williamsii 和 L. diffusa 之间在形态、三甲氧苯乙胺含量和叶绿体 trnL/trnF 区 DNA 序列上的差异。结果,L. williamsii 标本分为两组。第 1 组表皮有小的隆起,含有三甲氧苯乙胺,trnL/trnF 序列的分析区域除一个(877bp)外均为 881 个碱基对(bp)长。第 2 组表皮有大的隆起,不含三甲氧苯乙胺,分析区域长 893bp。另一方面,L. diffusa 表皮有中等大小的隆起,不含三甲氧苯乙胺,分析区域长 903bp。还研究了基于 trnL/trnF 序列的 PCR-限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)方法作为鉴定手段的潜在应用。通过应用 PCR-RFLP 方法,可以区分这两个物种,并将 L. williamsii 标本分为第 1 组和第 2 组。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验