• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反向旋转牙刷与多效牙刷的比较。

Comparison between the counter-rotational toothbrush and multi-action toothbrush.

作者信息

McKinney J, Burns S, Killoy W

机构信息

School of Dentistry, University of Missouri-Kansas City.

出版信息

J Clin Dent. 1990 Fall;2(2):39-42.

PMID:2090158
Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that two types of powered toothbrushes (Interplak and Braun) are more effective than a manual toothbrush in the removal of bacterial plaque from tooth surfaces. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the Interplak Home Plaque Removal Instrument (A) and the Braun Electric Toothbrush (B) on supragingival plaque removal and gingival bleeding following (1) one time instruction; (2) reinstruction and one week of home use; (3) a third instruction and three weeks of home use. The sample population for this study consisted of twelve subjects: six (6) were randomly assigned to use the Interplak, and the remaining six (6) were assigned to use the Braun. Subjects met specific qualification criteria to participate in this examiner-blind study. The Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index and an Objective-Subjective Gingival Abrasion Index were scored before and after brushing at the initial appointment, one week later, and at the final appointment in three weeks. A timed bleeding index (Barnett-Muhleman) and probing depths were recorded at the beginning of all three appointments. Subjects received instructions on the use of the assigned toothbrush in a clinical demonstration and in a printed format to take home. Subjects were then supervised in their brushing technique. Data was analyzed using a Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test and Analysis of Variance with Repeated Measures where appropriate. Although the number of patients was small, a statistically significant difference (p less than .05) in plaque scores between the groups was obtained in favor of the Interplak.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

先前的研究表明,两种电动牙刷(Interplak和博朗)在清除牙齿表面细菌菌斑方面比手动牙刷更有效。本研究的目的是比较Interplak家用除菌斑器械(A)和博朗电动牙刷(B)在以下情况下对龈上菌斑清除和牙龈出血的效果:(1)一次指导后;(2)再次指导并在家使用一周后;(3)第三次指导并在家使用三周后。本研究的样本群体由12名受试者组成:6名被随机分配使用Interplak,其余6名被分配使用博朗。受试者符合特定的资格标准以参与这项 examiner-blind 研究。在初次就诊时、一周后以及三周后的最终就诊时,在刷牙前后对Turesky改良的Quigley-Hein菌斑指数和客观-主观牙龈磨损指数进行评分。在所有三次就诊开始时记录定时出血指数(Barnett-Muhleman)和探诊深度。受试者在临床示范和带回家的印刷格式中接受了关于使用指定牙刷的指导。然后对受试者的刷牙技术进行监督。在适当情况下,使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和重复测量方差分析对数据进行分析。尽管患者数量较少,但两组之间的菌斑评分存在统计学上的显著差异(p小于0.05),有利于Interplak。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
Comparison between the counter-rotational toothbrush and multi-action toothbrush.反向旋转牙刷与多效牙刷的比较。
J Clin Dent. 1990 Fall;2(2):39-42.
2
Comparison of irrigation to floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing: effect on bleeding, gingivitis, and supragingival plaque.将冲洗与牙线作为刷牙辅助手段的比较:对出血、牙龈炎和龈上菌斑的影响。
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(3):71-7.
3
Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque.三种牙刷对已患牙龈炎和牙菌斑的疗效。
Am J Dent. 2008 Dec;21(6):339-45.
4
The relative effectiveness of six powered toothbrushes for dental plaque removal.六种电动牙刷在去除牙菌斑方面的相对有效性。
J Clin Dent. 2002;13(5):198-202.
5
A study of gingival irritation and plaque removal following a three-minute toothbrushing.一项关于三分钟刷牙后牙龈刺激和牙菌斑清除情况的研究。
J Clin Dent. 1994;5(1):1-4.
6
The comparative plaque removal efficacy of two advanced manual toothbrush designs in two independent clinical studies.两项独立临床研究中两种先进手动牙刷设计的相对牙菌斑清除效果。
J Clin Dent. 2001;12(3):83-6.
7
Comparative efficacy of a new battery-powered toothbrush and a commercially available manual toothbrush on the removal of established supragingival plaque: a single-use crossover study in adults.一种新型电池驱动牙刷与市售手动牙刷在清除已形成的龈上菌斑方面的比较疗效:一项针对成年人的一次性交叉研究。
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(2):57-61.
8
A split-mouth comparison of a three-dimensional-action electric toothbrush and a high-frequency electric toothbrush for reducing plaque and gingivitis.三维动作电动牙刷与高频电动牙刷减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎的分口对照研究。
J Int Acad Periodontol. 2001 Oct;3(4):95-103.
9
Plaque removal efficacy of a new experimental battery-powered toothbrush relative to two advanced-design manual toothbrushes.一种新型实验性电池驱动牙刷相对于两种先进设计手动牙刷的牙菌斑清除效果。
J Clin Dent. 2002;13(5):191-7.
10
A 3-month clinical comparison of the safety and efficacy of two battery-operated toothbrushes: the Braun Oral-B Battery toothbrush and the Colgate Actibrush.两款电动牙刷(博朗欧乐-B电池驱动牙刷和高露洁动感牙刷)安全性和有效性的3个月临床比较。
Am J Dent. 2001 Nov;14 Spec No:13B-17B.