Suppr超能文献

反向旋转牙刷与多效牙刷的比较。

Comparison between the counter-rotational toothbrush and multi-action toothbrush.

作者信息

McKinney J, Burns S, Killoy W

机构信息

School of Dentistry, University of Missouri-Kansas City.

出版信息

J Clin Dent. 1990 Fall;2(2):39-42.

PMID:2090158
Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that two types of powered toothbrushes (Interplak and Braun) are more effective than a manual toothbrush in the removal of bacterial plaque from tooth surfaces. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the Interplak Home Plaque Removal Instrument (A) and the Braun Electric Toothbrush (B) on supragingival plaque removal and gingival bleeding following (1) one time instruction; (2) reinstruction and one week of home use; (3) a third instruction and three weeks of home use. The sample population for this study consisted of twelve subjects: six (6) were randomly assigned to use the Interplak, and the remaining six (6) were assigned to use the Braun. Subjects met specific qualification criteria to participate in this examiner-blind study. The Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index and an Objective-Subjective Gingival Abrasion Index were scored before and after brushing at the initial appointment, one week later, and at the final appointment in three weeks. A timed bleeding index (Barnett-Muhleman) and probing depths were recorded at the beginning of all three appointments. Subjects received instructions on the use of the assigned toothbrush in a clinical demonstration and in a printed format to take home. Subjects were then supervised in their brushing technique. Data was analyzed using a Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test and Analysis of Variance with Repeated Measures where appropriate. Although the number of patients was small, a statistically significant difference (p less than .05) in plaque scores between the groups was obtained in favor of the Interplak.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

先前的研究表明,两种电动牙刷(Interplak和博朗)在清除牙齿表面细菌菌斑方面比手动牙刷更有效。本研究的目的是比较Interplak家用除菌斑器械(A)和博朗电动牙刷(B)在以下情况下对龈上菌斑清除和牙龈出血的效果:(1)一次指导后;(2)再次指导并在家使用一周后;(3)第三次指导并在家使用三周后。本研究的样本群体由12名受试者组成:6名被随机分配使用Interplak,其余6名被分配使用博朗。受试者符合特定的资格标准以参与这项 examiner-blind 研究。在初次就诊时、一周后以及三周后的最终就诊时,在刷牙前后对Turesky改良的Quigley-Hein菌斑指数和客观-主观牙龈磨损指数进行评分。在所有三次就诊开始时记录定时出血指数(Barnett-Muhleman)和探诊深度。受试者在临床示范和带回家的印刷格式中接受了关于使用指定牙刷的指导。然后对受试者的刷牙技术进行监督。在适当情况下,使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和重复测量方差分析对数据进行分析。尽管患者数量较少,但两组之间的菌斑评分存在统计学上的显著差异(p小于0.05),有利于Interplak。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验