Suppr超能文献

一项关于三分钟刷牙后牙龈刺激和牙菌斑清除情况的研究。

A study of gingival irritation and plaque removal following a three-minute toothbrushing.

作者信息

Yankell S L, Emling R C

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, Philadelphia.

出版信息

J Clin Dent. 1994;5(1):1-4.

PMID:8031483
Abstract

Twenty-five subjects were assessed for plaque and soft tissue safety monitored by gingival irritation the first thing in the morning of day one following no toothbrushing for 12-14 hours. Subjects then brushed with either the Dentrust (manual toothbrush), Crest Complete (manual toothbrush) or Interplak (mechanical toothbrush) for a timed three minutes under supervision. The toothbrush assignments were by a table of random numbers. Following brushing, the subjects were assessed immediately for levels of plaque and gingival irritation. The subjects were then recalled three hours later for another assessment of plaque levels and residual gingival irritation from the morning toothbrushing. After three or four days the subjects were recalled to test an alternate toothbrush. Three or four days later the subjects were recalled to test the final toothbrush. Levels of irritation severity were evaluated using standard soft tissue examination procedures, and after rinsing with disclosing solution and photography, with subsequent blind judging of stain intensity and area on the gingiva by a panel of three experienced investigators. In the first morning assessment there was no significant difference among plaque or gingival appearance or stain uptake levels of the three groups before using the three toothbrushes. Immediately following toothbrushing, the three groups exhibited similar levels of plaque removal and clinical or stain-related gingival irritation. There was no significant statistical difference among the plaque or safety evaluations, although the Interplak toothbrush demonstrated higher irritation levels judged by stain uptake than the manual toothbrushes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在12 - 14小时未刷牙后的第一天早晨,首先通过牙龈刺激情况对25名受试者的牙菌斑和软组织安全性进行评估。然后,受试者在监督下使用Dentrust(手动牙刷)、佳洁士全优7效(手动牙刷)或Interplak(电动牙刷)进行三分钟的定时刷牙。牙刷分配通过随机数表进行。刷牙后,立即对受试者的牙菌斑水平和牙龈刺激情况进行评估。三小时后,再次召回受试者,对早晨刷牙后的牙菌斑水平和残留牙龈刺激情况进行另一次评估。三四天后,召回受试者测试另一种牙刷。三四天后,召回受试者测试最后一种牙刷。使用标准的软组织检查程序评估刺激严重程度,用显影液冲洗并拍照后,由三名经验丰富的研究人员组成的小组对牙龈上的染色强度和面积进行盲法判断。在第一次早晨评估中,在使用三种牙刷之前,三组受试者的牙菌斑、牙龈外观或染色摄取水平之间没有显著差异。刷牙后,三组的牙菌斑清除水平以及临床或与染色相关的牙龈刺激情况相似。尽管通过染色摄取判断Interplak电动牙刷的刺激水平高于手动牙刷,但在牙菌斑或安全性评估方面没有显著的统计学差异。(摘要截短至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验