• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于三分钟刷牙后牙龈刺激和牙菌斑清除情况的研究。

A study of gingival irritation and plaque removal following a three-minute toothbrushing.

作者信息

Yankell S L, Emling R C

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, Philadelphia.

出版信息

J Clin Dent. 1994;5(1):1-4.

PMID:8031483
Abstract

Twenty-five subjects were assessed for plaque and soft tissue safety monitored by gingival irritation the first thing in the morning of day one following no toothbrushing for 12-14 hours. Subjects then brushed with either the Dentrust (manual toothbrush), Crest Complete (manual toothbrush) or Interplak (mechanical toothbrush) for a timed three minutes under supervision. The toothbrush assignments were by a table of random numbers. Following brushing, the subjects were assessed immediately for levels of plaque and gingival irritation. The subjects were then recalled three hours later for another assessment of plaque levels and residual gingival irritation from the morning toothbrushing. After three or four days the subjects were recalled to test an alternate toothbrush. Three or four days later the subjects were recalled to test the final toothbrush. Levels of irritation severity were evaluated using standard soft tissue examination procedures, and after rinsing with disclosing solution and photography, with subsequent blind judging of stain intensity and area on the gingiva by a panel of three experienced investigators. In the first morning assessment there was no significant difference among plaque or gingival appearance or stain uptake levels of the three groups before using the three toothbrushes. Immediately following toothbrushing, the three groups exhibited similar levels of plaque removal and clinical or stain-related gingival irritation. There was no significant statistical difference among the plaque or safety evaluations, although the Interplak toothbrush demonstrated higher irritation levels judged by stain uptake than the manual toothbrushes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在12 - 14小时未刷牙后的第一天早晨,首先通过牙龈刺激情况对25名受试者的牙菌斑和软组织安全性进行评估。然后,受试者在监督下使用Dentrust(手动牙刷)、佳洁士全优7效(手动牙刷)或Interplak(电动牙刷)进行三分钟的定时刷牙。牙刷分配通过随机数表进行。刷牙后,立即对受试者的牙菌斑水平和牙龈刺激情况进行评估。三小时后,再次召回受试者,对早晨刷牙后的牙菌斑水平和残留牙龈刺激情况进行另一次评估。三四天后,召回受试者测试另一种牙刷。三四天后,召回受试者测试最后一种牙刷。使用标准的软组织检查程序评估刺激严重程度,用显影液冲洗并拍照后,由三名经验丰富的研究人员组成的小组对牙龈上的染色强度和面积进行盲法判断。在第一次早晨评估中,在使用三种牙刷之前,三组受试者的牙菌斑、牙龈外观或染色摄取水平之间没有显著差异。刷牙后,三组的牙菌斑清除水平以及临床或与染色相关的牙龈刺激情况相似。尽管通过染色摄取判断Interplak电动牙刷的刺激水平高于手动牙刷,但在牙菌斑或安全性评估方面没有显著的统计学差异。(摘要截短至250字)

相似文献

1
A study of gingival irritation and plaque removal following a three-minute toothbrushing.一项关于三分钟刷牙后牙龈刺激和牙菌斑清除情况的研究。
J Clin Dent. 1994;5(1):1-4.
2
Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque.三种牙刷对已患牙龈炎和牙菌斑的疗效。
Am J Dent. 2008 Dec;21(6):339-45.
3
Comparison between the counter-rotational toothbrush and multi-action toothbrush.反向旋转牙刷与多效牙刷的比较。
J Clin Dent. 1990 Fall;2(2):39-42.
4
Comparative efficacy of a new battery-powered toothbrush and a commercially available manual toothbrush on the removal of established supragingival plaque: a single-use crossover study in adults.一种新型电池驱动牙刷与市售手动牙刷在清除已形成的龈上菌斑方面的比较疗效:一项针对成年人的一次性交叉研究。
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(2):57-61.
5
Plaque removal efficacy of a novel manual toothbrush with MicroPulse bristles and an advanced split-head design.一款具有微脉冲刷毛和先进分体刷头设计的新型手动牙刷的牙菌斑清除功效。
J Clin Dent. 2007;18(2):49-54.
6
A clinical study of comparative plaque removal performance of two manual toothbrushes.
J Clin Dent. 1993;4 Suppl D:D8-12.
7
The relative effectiveness of six powered toothbrushes for dental plaque removal.六种电动牙刷在去除牙菌斑方面的相对有效性。
J Clin Dent. 2002;13(5):198-202.
8
A study to assess the safety and tolerability of three toothbrushes.一项评估三种牙刷安全性和耐受性的研究。
J Clin Dent. 2002;13(5):203-6.
9
Comparison of irrigation to floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing: effect on bleeding, gingivitis, and supragingival plaque.将冲洗与牙线作为刷牙辅助手段的比较:对出血、牙龈炎和龈上菌斑的影响。
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(3):71-7.
10
Plaque removal efficacy of a new experimental battery-powered toothbrush relative to two advanced-design manual toothbrushes.一种新型实验性电池驱动牙刷相对于两种先进设计手动牙刷的牙菌斑清除效果。
J Clin Dent. 2002;13(5):191-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health.电动牙刷与手动牙刷对口腔健康的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 17;2014(6):CD002281. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002281.pub3.