• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[图片-文字加工中的视听Stroop干扰]

[Auditory-visual Stroop interference in picture-word processing].

作者信息

Ishio A

机构信息

Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education, Kyoto University.

出版信息

Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1990 Dec;61(5):329-35. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.61.329.

DOI:10.4992/jjpsy.61.329
PMID:2090849
Abstract

This study examined the features of cross-modal Stroop interference in picture-word processing by making comparison between auditory-visual and visual-visual tasks. Eleven subjects participated in each task and were instructed to name the picture as quickly as possible. To clarify the semantic-relatedness effect on the amount of interference, five types of different degrees of picture-word semantic relation were used: same stimulus (SS), same category (SC; both items belong to the same category), incongruent (IC), neutral (N) and control condition (C). To investigate the time course of information processing, stimulus onset asynchrony between the word and the picture were varied. In auditory-visual task strong interference effects were obtained in SC, IC and N conditions when the words preceded the pictures by 200,100 and 0 ms. In visual-visual task the similar effects were shown in SC and IC conditions within a 100 ms envelope around simultaneous onset of the two components. These results were discussed in relation to the locus of Stroop interference and the processing mechanisms of picture naming and word reading.

摘要

本研究通过比较听觉 - 视觉任务和视觉 - 视觉任务,考察了图片 - 单词加工中跨模态斯特鲁普干扰的特征。每项任务有11名受试者参与,并被要求尽快说出图片的名称。为了阐明语义相关性对干扰量的影响,使用了五种不同程度的图片 - 单词语义关系类型:相同刺激(SS)、相同类别(SC;两个项目属于同一类别)、不一致(IC)、中性(N)和控制条件(C)。为了研究信息加工的时间进程,单词和图片之间的刺激起始异步性是变化的。在听觉 - 视觉任务中,当单词比图片提前200、100和0毫秒呈现时,在SC、IC和N条件下获得了强烈的干扰效应。在视觉 - 视觉任务中,在两个成分同时呈现周围100毫秒的范围内,SC和IC条件下显示出类似的效应。这些结果结合斯特鲁普干扰的位点以及图片命名和单词阅读的加工机制进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
[Auditory-visual Stroop interference in picture-word processing].[图片-文字加工中的视听Stroop干扰]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1990 Dec;61(5):329-35. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.61.329.
2
Semantic component of a cross-modal Stroop-like task.一种跨模态类斯特鲁普任务的语义成分。
Am J Psychol. 1993 Fall;106(3):383-405.
3
[Information processing in Stroop-like picture naming tasks by preschool children].[学龄前儿童在类斯特鲁普图片命名任务中的信息处理]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1997 Oct;68(4):272-80. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.68.272.
4
Tracing the time course of picture--word processing.追踪图片-文字处理的时间进程。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1980 Dec;109(4):373-92. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.109.4.373.
5
Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.与显性命名中语义和 Stroop 样干扰效应相关的事件相关电位和振荡脑反应。
Brain Res. 2012 Apr 23;1450:87-101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.050. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
6
A funny thing happened on the way to articulation: N400 attenuation despite behavioral interference in picture naming.在言语产生的过程中发生了一件有趣的事情:尽管在图片命名中存在行为干扰,但 N400 却减弱了。
Cognition. 2012 Apr;123(1):84-99. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Jan 14.
7
Graphemic and semantic similarity effects in the picture-word interference task.图词干扰任务中的字素和语义相似性效应。
Br J Psychol. 1986 May;77 ( Pt 2):207-22. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb01995.x.
8
Components of Stroop-like interference in word reading.单词阅读中类斯特鲁普干扰的组成部分。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1990 Mar;73(2):115-29. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(90)90074-p.
9
Cross-modal stimulus conflict: the behavioral effects of stimulus input timing in a visual-auditory Stroop task.跨模态刺激冲突:视觉-听觉斯特鲁普任务中刺激输入时间对行为的影响。
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 29;8(4):e62802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062802. Print 2013.
10
Task choice and semantic interference in picture naming.图片命名中的任务选择与语义干扰
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 May;157:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Feb 19.