• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[学龄前儿童在类斯特鲁普图片命名任务中的信息处理]

[Information processing in Stroop-like picture naming tasks by preschool children].

作者信息

Tazume H

机构信息

Department of Child Psychology, Faculty of Education, Hiroshima University, Higashihiroshima.

出版信息

Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1997 Oct;68(4):272-80. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.68.272.

DOI:10.4992/jjpsy.68.272
PMID:9465374
Abstract

This study examined the difference between preschool (6-year-olds) children and adults in semantic information processing in line-drawn picture naming, using two types of Stroop-like picture naming tasks. In Experiment 1, voices (i.e., lexical information), and in Experiment 2, pictures (i.e., semantic information) were used as distracters. Subjects were asked to name target pictures as quickly as possible, ignoring distracters. To clarify the effect of semantic relations on the amount of interference, four types of target-distracter semantic relations were used as experimental conditions: same stimulus (SS), same category (SC), different category (DC), and control (C). To investigate the time course of processing, stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between target and distracter was varied. The results indicated that the patterns of reaction time showed more remarkable difference between children and adults in Experiment 1 than in Experiment 2. These results were discussed on the basis of Glaser and Glaser (1989)'s model in which semantic memory and lexicon were separate.

摘要

本研究使用两种类似斯特鲁普效应的图片命名任务,考察了学龄前儿童(6岁)和成年人在线条画命名中语义信息处理方面的差异。在实验1中,语音(即词汇信息)作为干扰项,在实验2中,图片(即语义信息)作为干扰项。要求被试尽快说出目标图片的名称,忽略干扰项。为了阐明语义关系对干扰量的影响,使用了四种目标-干扰项语义关系作为实验条件:相同刺激(SS)、同一类别(SC)、不同类别(DC)和控制组(C)。为了研究处理的时间进程,改变了目标和干扰项之间的刺激呈现异步性(SOA)。结果表明,与实验2相比,实验1中儿童和成年人的反应时间模式差异更为显著。基于格拉泽和格拉泽(1989)提出的语义记忆和词汇表相互独立的模型,对这些结果进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
[Information processing in Stroop-like picture naming tasks by preschool children].[学龄前儿童在类斯特鲁普图片命名任务中的信息处理]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1997 Oct;68(4):272-80. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.68.272.
2
[Auditory-visual Stroop interference in picture-word processing].[图片-文字加工中的视听Stroop干扰]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1990 Dec;61(5):329-35. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.61.329.
3
Tracing the time course of picture--word processing.追踪图片-文字处理的时间进程。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1980 Dec;109(4):373-92. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.109.4.373.
4
Semantic component of a cross-modal Stroop-like task.一种跨模态类斯特鲁普任务的语义成分。
Am J Psychol. 1993 Fall;106(3):383-405.
5
Comparing color-word and picture-word Stroop-like effects: a test of the Glaser and Glaser (1989) model.比较颜色-单词和图片-单词类斯特鲁普效应:对格拉泽和格拉泽(1989年)模型的一项测试。
Psychol Res. 1994;56(4):293-300. doi: 10.1007/BF00419659.
6
Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.与显性命名中语义和 Stroop 样干扰效应相关的事件相关电位和振荡脑反应。
Brain Res. 2012 Apr 23;1450:87-101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.050. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
7
Localizing semantic interference from distractor sounds in picture naming: A dual-task study.在图片命名中定位干扰声音的语义干扰:一项双任务研究。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1909-1916. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1386-5.
8
Cumulative semantic cost without successful naming.无成功命名的累积语义成本。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Oct;49(7):1348-1359. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01172-3. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
9
Word naming slows picture naming but does not affect cumulative semantic interference.单词命名会减慢图片命名的速度,但不影响累积语义干扰。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Apr;195:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
10
Locus of semantic interference in picture naming: Evidence from dual-task performance.图片命名中的语义干扰焦点:来自双重任务表现的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):147-65. doi: 10.1037/a0033745. Epub 2013 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of perceptual load on semantic access by speech in children.知觉负荷对儿童言语语义通达的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Apr;56(2):388-403. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0186). Epub 2012 Aug 15.