• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A note on Youden's J and its cost ratio.尤登 J 值及其费用比的说明。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Sep 30;10:89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-89.
2
Enhanced Youden's index with net benefit: A feasible approach for optimal-threshold determination in shared decision making.基于净效益的增强尤登指数:共享决策中确定最佳阈值的可行方法。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;26(2):551-558. doi: 10.1111/jep.13311. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
3
The choice of methods in determining the optimal cut-off value for quantitative diagnostic test evaluation.定量诊断性试验评价中最优界值确定方法的选择。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Aug;27(8):2374-2383. doi: 10.1177/0962280216680383. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
4
Measurement of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of non-invasive diagnostic testing strategies for deep vein thrombosis.深静脉血栓形成的非侵入性诊断检测策略的临床及成本效益测量
Health Technol Assess. 2006 May;10(15):1-168, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10150.
5
Adjusting the obesity thresholds for self-reported BMI in Ireland: a cross-sectional analysis.调整爱尔兰自我报告 BMI 的肥胖阈值:一项横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2013 May 28;3(5):e002865. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002865.
6
A simple framework to identify optimal cost-effective risk thresholds for a single screen: Comparison to Decision Curve Analysis.一种用于确定单一筛查最佳成本效益风险阈值的简单框架:与决策曲线分析的比较。
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2021 Jul;184(3):887-903. doi: 10.1111/rssa.12680. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
7
Confidence intervals around Bayes Cost in multi-state diagnostic settings to estimate optimal performance.多状态诊断环境中围绕贝叶斯成本的置信区间,用于估计最佳性能。
Stat Med. 2014 Aug 30;33(19):3280-99. doi: 10.1002/sim.6174. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
8
Cost-effectiveness of non-invasive methods for assessment and monitoring of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver disease: systematic review and economic evaluation.慢性肝病患者肝纤维化和肝硬化评估及监测的非侵入性方法的成本效益:系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jan;19(9):1-409, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta19090.
9
Evaluation of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Diagnostics Assessment Program Decisions: Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio Thresholds and Decision-Modifying Factors.国家卫生与保健卓越研究所诊断评估计划决策评估:增量成本效益比阈值和决策修正因素。
Value Health. 2020 Oct;23(10):1300-1306. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.1835. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
10
Regret graphs, diagnostic uncertainty and Youden's Index.遗憾图、诊断不确定性与尤登指数。
Stat Med. 1996 May 30;15(10):969-86. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960530)15:10<969::AID-SIM211>3.0.CO;2-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Open-source computational pipeline flags instances of acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated adult patients.开源计算管道可标记接受机械通气的成年患者的急性呼吸窘迫综合征病例。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 23;16(1):6787. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61418-5.
2
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Anxiety subscale (HADS-A) for detecting anxiety disorders in adults.用于检测成人焦虑症的医院焦虑抑郁量表焦虑分量表(HADS-A)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 2;7(7):CD015456. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015456.
3
Comparison of salivary statherin and beta-defensin-2 levels, oral health behaviors, and demographic factors in children with and without early childhood caries.有和没有幼儿龋齿的儿童唾液富组蛋白和β-防御素-2水平、口腔健康行为及人口统计学因素的比较
BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 31;25(1):868. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06252-3.
4
Comparison of health measures between survey self-reports and electronic health records among Millennium Cohort Study participants receiving Veterans Health Administration care.在接受退伍军人健康管理局医疗服务的千禧队列研究参与者中,比较调查自我报告与电子健康记录之间的健康指标。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Mar 27;25(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02529-x.
5
Age-optimized cut-off values for pubofemoral distances in screening for hip dysplasia.用于髋关节发育不良筛查的耻骨股骨距离的年龄优化截断值。
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Feb 3;6(2):119-125. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.62.BJO-2024-0181.R1.
6
Comparison of the diagnostic value of various microRNAs in blood for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较血液中各种 microRNAs 对结直肠癌的诊断价值:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Jun 26;24(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12528-8.
7
Gender-specific prolactin thresholds to determine prolactinoma size: a novel Bayesian approach and its clinical utility.用于确定泌乳素瘤大小的性别特异性泌乳素阈值:一种新型贝叶斯方法及其临床应用。
Front Surg. 2024 Mar 13;11:1363431. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1363431. eCollection 2024.
8
PROPOSE. Development and validation of a prediction model for shared decision making for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.提议。腰椎管狭窄症患者共同决策预测模型的开发与验证。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2024 Jan 11;17:100309. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100309. eCollection 2024 Mar.
9
Development and validation of a risk prediction model for pulmonary tuberculosis among presumptive tuberculosis cases in Ethiopia.开发和验证埃塞俄比亚疑似结核病患者中肺结核风险预测模型。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 14;13(12):e076587. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076587.
10
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item Pairing Predictiveness for Prescreening Depressive Symptomatology: Machine Learning Analysis.患者健康问卷-9项配对对抑郁症状预筛查的预测性:机器学习分析
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Oct 19;10:e48444. doi: 10.2196/48444.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing child and adolescent anxiety in psychiatric samples with the Child Behavior Checklist.使用儿童行为检查表评估精神科样本中的儿童和青少年焦虑。
J Anxiety Disord. 2010 Jun;24(5):461-7. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
2
Breast cancer diagnosis from proteomic mass spectrometry data: a comparative evaluation.基于蛋白质组质谱数据的乳腺癌诊断:一项比较评估。
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2008;7(2):Article15. doi: 10.2202/1544-6115.1435. Epub 2008 Dec 22.
3
Using decision theory to derive optimal cut-off scores of screening instruments: an illustration explicating costs and benefits of mental health screening.运用决策理论推导筛查工具的最佳临界分数:阐释心理健康筛查成本与效益的示例
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2007;16(4):219-29. doi: 10.1002/mpr.230.
4
Youden Index and the optimal threshold for markers with mass at zero.尤登指数与质量为零的标志物的最佳阈值。
Stat Med. 2008 Jan 30;27(2):297-315. doi: 10.1002/sim.2993.
5
A solution for the most basic optimization problem associated with an ROC curve.与ROC曲线相关的最基本优化问题的一种解决方案。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2006 Dec;15(6):571-84. doi: 10.1177/0962280206070637.
6
Estimation of the Youden Index and its associated cutoff point.尤登指数及其相关截断点的估计。
Biom J. 2005 Aug;47(4):458-72. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200410135.
7
Index for rating diagnostic tests.诊断试验评级指数。
Cancer. 1950 Jan;3(1):32-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::aid-cncr2820030106>3.0.co;2-3.
8
The Youden index: letters to the editor.尤登指数:致编辑的信
Cancer. 1950 Nov;3(6):1097-1101. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:6<1097::aid-cncr2820030620>3.0.co;2-e.
9
Reconsidering the odds ratio as a measure of 2x2 association in a population.重新审视将优势比作为总体中2×2关联度的一种度量方法。
Stat Med. 2004 Jan 30;23(2):257-70. doi: 10.1002/sim.1714.
10
Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine.受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线:临床医学中的一种基本评估工具。
Clin Chem. 1993 Apr;39(4):561-77.

尤登 J 值及其费用比的说明。

A note on Youden's J and its cost ratio.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Sep 30;10:89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-89.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-10-89
PMID:20920288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2959030/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Youden index, the sum of sensitivity and specificity minus one, is an index used for setting optimal thresholds on medical tests.

DISCUSSION

When using this index, one implicitly uses decision theory with a ratio of misclassification costs which is equal to one minus the prevalence proportion of the disease. It is doubtful whether this cost ratio truly represents the decision maker's preferences. Moreover, in populations with a different prevalence, a selected threshold is optimal with reference to a different cost ratio.

SUMMARY

The Youden index is not a truly optimal decision rule for setting thresholds because its cost ratio varies with prevalence. Researchers should look into their cost ratio and employ it in a decision theoretic framework to obtain genuinely optimal thresholds.

摘要

背景

约登指数是一种用于确定医学检测最佳阈值的指标,它等于敏感度和特异度之和减一。

讨论

使用该指数时,人们会隐含地使用决策理论,并使用误分类成本的比值,该比值等于疾病流行率的倒数。这种成本比值是否真的代表决策者的偏好是值得怀疑的。此外,在流行率不同的人群中,选择的阈值与不同的成本比值相关,是最优的。

总结

由于约登指数的成本比值随流行率而变化,因此它不是设置阈值的真正最优决策规则。研究人员应该研究其成本比值,并在决策理论框架内使用它,以获得真正最优的阈值。