• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支架断裂的发生率、临床特征及意义的荟萃分析。

Meta-analysis of incidence, clinical characteristics and implications of stent fracture.

机构信息

Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2010 Oct 15;106(8):1075-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.010.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.010
PMID:20920641
Abstract

A meta-analysis of published studies was conducted to evaluate the incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes of stent fractures. Eight studies with 108 stent fractures in 5,321 patients were analyzed using the Bayesian method. Study end points included in-stent restenosis (ISR) and target lesion revascularization (TLR). The mean incidence of stent fracture per patient was 4.0% (95% confidence interval 0.4% to 16.3%). All cases, except 1, were reported with sirolimus-eluting stents. The incidence of stent fracture was 30.4% in the left anterior descending coronary artery, 10.9% in the left circumflex coronary artery, 56.4% in the right coronary artery, < 0.01% in the left main coronary artery, and 1.7% in saphenous vein grafts. The probability of stent fracture was significantly higher in the right coronary artery than in the left anterior descending and left circumflex lesions (p < 0.01). Left main stents were less likely to fracture compared to those in all other vessels (p < 0.01). The probability of stent fracture was significantly increased in overlapping stents (7.5% vs 2.1%, p = 0.01) and long stents (46 vs 32.5 mm, p < 0.01). Lesions with stent fractures had higher rates of ISR (38% vs 8.2%, p < 0.01) and TLR (17% vs 5.6%, p < 0.01). Conversely, the probability of stent fractures was higher in patients with ISR (12.8% vs 2.1%, p < 0.01) and TLR (8.8% vs 2.7%, p < 0.01). In conclusion, although not always associated with clinical sequelae, the probability of ISR and TLR is increased with stent fracture. Conversely, the probability of stent fractures is increased in lesions with ISR or TLR, thus raising the need for surveillance and management guidelines for at-risk patients.

摘要

进行了一项已发表研究的荟萃分析,以评估支架断裂的发生率、预测因素和临床结果。使用贝叶斯方法分析了 8 项研究,共纳入 5321 例患者的 108 例支架断裂。研究终点包括支架内再狭窄(ISR)和靶病变血运重建(TLR)。每位患者支架断裂的平均发生率为 4.0%(95%置信区间为 0.4%至 16.3%)。除 1 例外,所有病例均报告使用西罗莫司洗脱支架。在前降支冠状动脉、左旋支冠状动脉、右冠状动脉、左主干冠状动脉和大隐静脉桥中的支架断裂发生率分别为 30.4%、10.9%、56.4%、<0.01%和 1.7%。与前降支和左旋支病变相比,右冠状动脉支架断裂的概率明显更高(p<0.01)。与其他所有血管相比,左主干支架发生断裂的可能性较低(p<0.01)。重叠支架(7.5%比 2.1%,p=0.01)和长支架(46 毫米比 32.5 毫米,p<0.01)的支架断裂概率显著增加。支架断裂的病变 ISR 发生率(38%比 8.2%,p<0.01)和 TLR 发生率(17%比 5.6%,p<0.01)均较高。相反,ISR(12.8%比 2.1%,p<0.01)和 TLR(8.8%比 2.7%,p<0.01)患者的支架断裂概率较高。总之,尽管支架断裂并不总是与临床后果相关,但与支架断裂相关的 ISR 和 TLR 发生率增加。相反,ISR 或 TLR 病变的支架断裂概率增加,因此需要为高危患者制定监测和管理指南。

相似文献

1
Meta-analysis of incidence, clinical characteristics and implications of stent fracture.支架断裂的发生率、临床特征及意义的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Oct 15;106(8):1075-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.010.
2
Comparison of sirolimus versus paclitaxel eluting stents for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis.西罗莫司与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Apr 15;97(8):1182-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.11.034. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
3
Long-term follow-up of drug-eluting stents when inserted for on- and off-label indications.药物洗脱支架用于适应证内和适应证外情况时的长期随访
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Dec 1;100(11):1619-24. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.07.013. Epub 2007 Oct 10.
4
Randomized double-blind comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent implantation in diseased saphenous vein grafts: six-month angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical follow-up of the RRISC Trial.雷帕霉素洗脱支架与裸金属支架植入病变大隐静脉桥血管的随机双盲比较:RRISC 试验的六个月血管造影、血管内超声及临床随访
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Dec 19;48(12):2423-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.09.021. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
5
A single center investigation of bare-metal or drug-eluting stent restenosis from 1633 consecutive Chinese Han ethnic patients.对1633例连续的中国汉族患者进行的裸金属支架或药物洗脱支架再狭窄的单中心研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2006 Apr 5;119(7):533-8.
6
Comparison of outcomes of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in nonostial proximal left anterior descending coronary arteries.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架在非开口处近端左前降支冠状动脉中的疗效比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Feb 15;103(4):496-500. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.10.028.
7
Frequency of stent fracture as a cause of coronary restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.西罗莫司洗脱支架植入术后支架断裂作为冠状动脉再狭窄原因的发生率
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Aug 15;100(4):627-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.073. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
8
Predictor of subsequent target lesion revascularization in patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.药物洗脱支架再狭窄患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后靶病变血运重建的预测因素。
J Cardiol. 2010 May;55(3):391-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 Feb 7.
9
Frequency, predictors and outcome of stent fracture after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.西罗莫司洗脱支架置入术后支架断裂的频率、预测因素及转归。
Int J Cardiol. 2009 Apr 17;133(3):321-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.12.067. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
10
Incidence and predictors of recurrent restenosis following implantation of drug-eluting stents for in-stent restenosis.药物洗脱支架植入治疗支架内再狭窄后复发性再狭窄的发生率及预测因素。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Jan;69(1):104-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20908.

引用本文的文献

1
From Mechanisms to Management: Tackling In-Stent Restenosis in the Drug-Eluting Stent Era.从机制到管理:应对药物洗脱支架时代的支架内再狭窄
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Feb 11;27(1):53. doi: 10.1007/s11886-025-02193-z.
2
Non-invasive recanalization of first-generation sirolimus-eluting stent thrombosis due to stent fracture and coronary artery aneurysm after clopidogrel treatment 15 years after implantation.植入15年后,在氯吡格雷治疗后,因支架断裂和冠状动脉瘤导致的第一代西罗莫司洗脱支架血栓形成的无创再通
J Cardiol Cases. 2024 Feb 2;29(5):209-213. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2024.01.004. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Coronary Stent Fracture Causing Myocardial Infarction: Case Report and Review of Literature.
冠状动脉支架断裂导致心肌梗死:病例报告及文献综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 16;23(11):384. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2311384. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
Effect of Applied Potential on Fatigue Life of Electropolished Nitinol Wires.外加电势对电解抛光镍钛诺丝疲劳寿命的影响
Shap Mem Superelasticity. 2017 Sep;3:238-249. doi: 10.1007/s40830-017-0109-0. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
5
Freedom From Stent Fracture-Related Complications of Vascular Longitudinal Remodeling in a Patient With Heart Failure and a Degraded Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold.心力衰竭和生物可吸收血管支架降解患者血管纵向重塑后免于支架断裂相关并发症。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2023 Jan 1;50(1). doi: 10.14503/THIJ-21-7732.
6
Incidence of coronary drug-eluting stent fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.冠状动脉药物洗脱支架断裂的发生率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 23;9:925912. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.925912. eCollection 2022.
7
Intravascular imaging in coronary stent restenosis: Prevention, characterization, and management.冠状动脉支架再狭窄的血管内成像:预防、特征分析与管理。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 9;9:843734. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.843734. eCollection 2022.
8
Coronary Artery Radial Deformation and Velocity in Native and Stented Arteries.冠状动脉的径向变形和速度:原生血管与支架血管的比较。
J Interv Cardiol. 2022 Mar 26;2022:5981027. doi: 10.1155/2022/5981027. eCollection 2022.
9
Coronary stent fracture in an octogenarian patient: from bad to worse.一名八旬患者的冠状动脉支架断裂:病情恶化。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2021 Nov 28;18(11):968-972. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.11.009.
10
Coronary Stent Strut Fractures: Classification, Prevalence and Clinical Associations.冠状动脉支架支柱骨折:分类、患病率及临床关联
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 19;10(8):1765. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081765.