• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲国家痴呆症护理资源利用和成本的差异:ICTUS 研究的基线数据。

Differences in resource use and costs of dementia care between European countries: baseline data from the ICTUS study.

机构信息

i3 Innovus, Klarabergsviadukten 90 Hus D, 111 64 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

J Nutr Health Aging. 2010 Oct;14(8):648-54. doi: 10.1007/s12603-010-0311-7.

DOI:10.1007/s12603-010-0311-7
PMID:20922341
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to estimate the costs of formal and informal care of patients with Alzheimer's disease, to compare care costs across European countries and identify potential differences in cost patterns between countries and regions.

SETTING

The ICTUS study is a prospective, naturalistic observational study conducted in specialised memory clinics in 12 European countries. In total, 1385 patients diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease were enrolled at baseline. All subjects had a reliable informant (primary caregiver) and informed consent was obtained from patients or their primary caregiver.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Resource utilization data was captured with the RUD Lite (Resource Utilization in Dementia) instrument and caregiver burden with the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). Patient disease severity was measured with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog), Katz´ index (PADL), Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scale and Neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI).

RESULTS

The mean annual cost of care per patient was estimated to €7,820 (95% CI: €7,194-€8,446), whereof 54% were costs of informal care, 16% direct medical costs and 30% community care costs. There were substantial differences in total resource utilization and also in the balance between formal and informal care between Northern, Western and Southern Europe. PADL scores were strongly associated with formal care costs while IADL scores correlated strongly with informal care costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Costs of Alzheimer's disease are high across European countries. Activities of daily living is an important determinant of care costs. Formal care service use is lower and informal care higher in Southern Europe compared to Western and Northern Europe. Differences in resource utilization patterns are important to consider in international studies of dementia care costs as well as in economic evaluations of new treatments for dementia.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估阿尔茨海默病患者的正式和非正式护理成本,比较欧洲国家的护理成本,并确定国家和地区之间成本模式的潜在差异。

设置

ICTUS 研究是一项在 12 个欧洲国家的专门记忆诊所进行的前瞻性、自然观察研究。共有 1385 名确诊为阿尔茨海默病的患者在基线时入组。所有患者都有一个可靠的知情人(主要照顾者),并获得了患者或其主要照顾者的知情同意。

主要观察指标

资源利用数据采用 RUD Lite(痴呆症资源利用)量表和照顾者负担采用 Zarit 负担访谈(ZBI)量表进行收集。患者疾病严重程度采用简易精神状态检查(MMSE)、阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知子量表(ADAS-cog)、Katz 指数(PADL)、工具性日常生活活动(IADL)量表和神经精神问卷(NPI)进行测量。

结果

每位患者的年平均护理费用估计为 7820 欧元(95%置信区间:7194-8446 欧元),其中 54%为非正式护理费用,16%为直接医疗费用,30%为社区护理费用。北欧、西欧和南欧之间的总资源利用以及正式和非正式护理之间的平衡存在很大差异。PADL 评分与正式护理费用密切相关,而 IADL 评分与非正式护理费用密切相关。

结论

欧洲各国的阿尔茨海默病护理成本都很高。日常生活活动是护理费用的重要决定因素。与北欧和西欧相比,南欧的正式护理服务使用率较低,非正式护理服务使用率较高。资源利用模式的差异对于痴呆症护理成本的国际研究以及痴呆症新疗法的经济评估都很重要。

相似文献

1
Differences in resource use and costs of dementia care between European countries: baseline data from the ICTUS study.欧洲国家痴呆症护理资源利用和成本的差异:ICTUS 研究的基线数据。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2010 Oct;14(8):648-54. doi: 10.1007/s12603-010-0311-7.
2
Costs of care for people with dementia just before and after nursing home placement: primary data from eight European countries.养老院安置前后痴呆症患者护理费用:来自八个欧洲国家的原始数据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2015 Sep;16(7):689-707. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0620-6. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
3
Factors associated with long-term impact on informal caregivers during Alzheimer's disease dementia progression: 36-month results from GERAS.与阿尔茨海默病痴呆进展过程中对非正式照护者的长期影响相关的因素:来自 GERAS 的 36 个月结果。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2020 Feb;32(2):267-277. doi: 10.1017/S1041610219000425. Epub 2019 May 28.
4
Costs of Care of Agitation Associated With Dementia in 8 European Countries: Results From the RightTimePlaceCare Study.8 个欧洲国家痴呆相关激越护理成本:来自 RightTimePlaceCare 研究的结果。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Jan;19(1):95.e1-95.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.10.013.
5
Economic Analysis of Formal Care, Informal Care, and Productivity Losses in Primary Care Patients who Screened Positive for Dementia in Germany.德国痴呆症筛查呈阳性的初级护理患者的正规护理、非正规护理及生产力损失的经济分析
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;50(1):47-59. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150600.
6
Costs and Resource Use Associated with Alzheimer's Disease in Italy: Results from an Observational Study.意大利阿尔茨海默病的成本和资源利用:一项观察性研究的结果。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2018;5(1):55-64. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2017.31.
7
Costs of dementia in Hungary.匈牙利的痴呆症成本。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2010 Oct;14(8):633-9. doi: 10.1007/s12603-010-0309-1.
8
Cost of informal care for community-dwelling mild-moderate dementia patients in a developed Southeast Asian country.在一个发达的东南亚国家,社区居住的轻度至中度痴呆症患者的非正式护理成本。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Sep;25(9):1475-83. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213000707. Epub 2013 May 22.
9
[Caregiver burden in dementia: evaluation with a Japanese version of the Zarit caregiver burden interview].[痴呆症中的照顾者负担:使用日语版的 Zarit 照顾者负担访谈进行评估]
No To Shinkei. 1998 Jun;50(6):561-7.
10
The GERAS Study: a prospective observational study of costs and resource use in community dwellers with Alzheimer's disease in three European countries--study design and baseline findings.GERAS 研究:在三个欧洲国家的社区居住的阿尔茨海默病患者中成本和资源利用的前瞻性观察研究——研究设计和基线结果。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;36(2):385-99. doi: 10.3233/JAD-122392.

引用本文的文献

1
Direct healthcare expenditure on Alzheimer's disease from healthcare providers' perspective in Malaysia: a micro-costing approach.马来西亚医疗保健提供者视角下的阿尔茨海默病直接医疗支出:微观成本法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 14;14(1):18855. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69745-1.
2
The formal care costs of dementia: a longitudinal study using Swedish register data.痴呆症的正式护理成本:一项使用瑞典登记数据的纵向研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Apr;26(3):353-361. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01707-w. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
3
The affordability of lecanemab, an amyloid-targeting therapy for Alzheimer's disease: an EADC-EC viewpoint.

本文引用的文献

1
The Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) instrument is valid for assessing informal care time in community-living patients with dementia.《痴呆患者资源利用(RUD)量表》可用于评估社区居住的痴呆患者的非正式护理时间。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2010 Oct;14(8):685-90. doi: 10.1007/s12603-010-0316-2.
2
An estimate of the total worldwide societal costs of dementia in 2005.2005年全球痴呆症社会总成本的估计数。
Alzheimers Dement. 2007 Apr;3(2):81-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2007.02.001.
3
The cost of dementia in Europe: a review of the evidence, and methodological considerations.
用于治疗阿尔茨海默病的淀粉样蛋白靶向疗法——lecanemab的可负担性:欧洲阿尔茨海默病临床医生俱乐部(EADC)和欧洲临床药理学会(EC)的观点
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 May 22;29:100657. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100657. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
The Costs of Dementia in Europe: An Updated Review and Meta-analysis.欧洲的痴呆症成本:一项更新的综述和荟萃分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Jan;41(1):59-75. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01212-z. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
5
International depiction of the cost of functional independence limitations among older adults living in the community: a systematic review and cost-of-impairment study.国际社会对社区中老年人功能独立性受限成本的描述:一项系统评价和损伤成本研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Oct 22;22(1):815. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03466-w.
6
The personal economic burden of dementia in Europe.欧洲痴呆症的个人经济负担。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Jul 25;20:100472. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100472. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
The economic burden of dementia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): a systematic review.中低收入国家(LMICs)痴呆症的经济负担:系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Apr;7(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007409.
8
Quality of Life and Caregiver Burden of Alzheimer's Disease Among Community Dwelling Patients in Europe: Variation by Disease Severity and Progression.欧洲社区居住的阿尔茨海默病患者的生活质量与照料者负担:因疾病严重程度和进展情况而异
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2021 Oct 25;5(1):791-804. doi: 10.3233/ADR-210025. eCollection 2021.
9
The consequences of COVID-19 lockdown for formal and informal resource utilization among home-dwelling people with dementia: results from the prospective PAN.DEM study.COVID-19 封锁对居家痴呆症患者正规和非正规资源利用的影响:前瞻性 PAN.DEM 研究结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 22;21(1):1003. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07041-8.
10
Which factors increase informal care hours and societal costs among caregivers of people with dementia? A systematic review of Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD).哪些因素会增加痴呆症患者照料者的非正式照料时长和社会成本?对痴呆症资源利用(RUD)的系统评价。
Health Econ Rev. 2021 Sep 18;11(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00333-z.
欧洲痴呆症的成本:证据综述及方法学考量
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(5):391-403. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200927050-00004.
4
Tolerability of switching from donepezil to memantine treatment in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease.中重度阿尔茨海默病患者从多奈哌齐转换为美金刚治疗的耐受性
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Sep;23(9):979-81. doi: 10.1002/gps.1979.
5
Validity and reliability of assessments of time. Comparisons of direct observations and estimates of time by the use of the resource utilization in dementia (RUD)-instrument.时间评估的有效性和可靠性。使用痴呆症资源利用(RUD)工具对直接观察和时间估计进行比较。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2007 Jan-Feb;44(1):71-81. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2006.03.001. Epub 2006 Jun 13.
6
Determinants of costs of care for patients with Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病患者护理成本的决定因素。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 May;21(5):449-59. doi: 10.1002/gps.1489.
7
The clinical and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and memantine for Alzheimer's disease.多奈哌齐、卡巴拉汀、加兰他敏和美金刚用于治疗阿尔茨海默病的临床疗效及成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jan;10(1):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-160. doi: 10.3310/hta10010.
8
An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and direct costs of dementia in 2003.2003年全球痴呆症患病率及直接成本估计
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2006;21(3):175-81. doi: 10.1159/000090733. Epub 2006 Jan 9.
9
Impact of donepezil treatment for Alzheimer's disease on caregiver time.多奈哌齐治疗阿尔茨海默病对照料者时间的影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Aug;20(8):1221-5. doi: 10.1185/030079902125004349.
10
Describing, explaining or predicting mental health care costs: a guide to regression models. Methodological review.描述、解释或预测精神卫生保健成本:回归模型指南。方法学综述。
Br J Psychiatry. 2003 Nov;183:398-404. doi: 10.1192/bjp.183.5.398.