KI Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Nutr Health Aging. 2010 Oct;14(8):685-90. doi: 10.1007/s12603-010-0316-2.
Informal care is a significant component of the societal resource use and costs in dementia care. Thus it is fundamental that assessments of informal care are valid. Thus the aim was to analyse the validity of time estimates with the Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) instrument.
Prospective observational study.
Community sample.
Fourteen married and cohabiting patient-caregiver pairs.
Comparisons of estimates of caregiver time by recall with the RUD instrument, by diaries and by direct observation, with calculation of agreement statistics for recall vs. diary and recall vs. direct observation to assess accuracy of the time estimates derived from recall.
The patients and their caregivers participated in 47 diaries and 30 observation sessions. The agreement between diaries and recall estimates was high for personal ADL (intra-class correlation (ICC) 0.93), supervision (ICC 0.87) and total time (ICC 0.91) and lower but acceptable for instrumental ADL (ICC 0.75). Regarding observation vs recall estimates, the corresponding figures were for personal ADL (ICC 0.81), for instrumental ADL (ICC 0.74), for supervision (ICC 0.78) and for total time (ICC 0.80).
The RUD instrument appears to accurately estimate the amount of informal care provided by caregivers to dementia patients.
非正规护理是痴呆症护理中社会资源利用和成本的重要组成部分。因此,评估非正规护理的有效性是至关重要的。因此,本研究旨在分析资源利用在痴呆症(RUD)工具评估中的时间估计的有效性。
前瞻性观察研究。
社区样本。
14 对已婚或同居的患者-照顾者对。
通过回忆、RUD 工具、日记和直接观察来比较照顾者时间的估计值,并计算回忆与日记和回忆与直接观察之间的一致性统计数据,以评估从回忆中得出的时间估计值的准确性。
患者及其照顾者参与了 47 次日记记录和 30 次观察。日记和回忆估计之间的一致性很高,个人日常生活活动(ICC 0.93)、监督(ICC 0.87)和总时间(ICC 0.91),而工具性日常生活活动(ICC 0.75)的一致性较低但可接受。关于观察与回忆估计值,相应的数字是个人日常生活活动(ICC 0.81)、工具性日常生活活动(ICC 0.74)、监督(ICC 0.78)和总时间(ICC 0.80)。
RUD 工具似乎可以准确估计照顾者为痴呆症患者提供的非正规护理量。