School of Biomedical Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Nov;26(11):2635-41. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.522155. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
The aim of this brief review is to summarize the literature as it relates to the potential value of repeat stool testing for Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) toxin using an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for toxin A&B and also propose a potential newer algorithm for diagnosing C. difficile.
Two investigators conducted independent literature searches using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus until May 1st, 2010. All databases were searched using the terms Clostridium difficile, CDAD, antibiotic associated diarrhea, C. difficile in combination with enzyme immunoassay, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, Clostridium difficile toxin A, Clostridium difficile toxin B, Clostridium difficile toxin and repeat stool testing. Articles which discussed EIA in C. difficile infection (CDI) patients were reviewed and relevant cross references also read and evaluated for inclusion. Selection bias could be a possible limitation of the approach used in selecting or finding articles for this article.
The evidence for repeat stool testing for C. difficile toxin detection using toxin EIA is becoming weaker. Most recent published practice guidelines recommend a two- or three-step testing algorithm for the detection of C. difficile.
EIA for C. difficile stool toxin has a limited sensitivity, but, it does not warrant repeat stool testing. The data for this are suggestive but not conclusive. More studies and better tests are needed to have clear guidelines which can specify the number of tests needed in a diagnostic workup of suspected C. difficile infection. A two-step or three-step method in the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea offered a marked increase in sensitivity compared to that of toxin A&B EIA alone.
本文简要回顾了文献,总结了应用酶联免疫吸附试验(EIA)检测毒素 A&B 时重复检测粪便中艰难梭菌(C. difficile)毒素的潜在价值,并提出了一种用于诊断艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的新算法。
两名研究者独立检索了 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Scopus 数据库,检索时间截至 2010 年 5 月 1 日,使用的检索词包括艰难梭菌、CDAD、抗生素相关性腹泻、艰难梭菌与 EIA 联合检测、酶联免疫吸附试验、艰难梭菌毒素 A、艰难梭菌毒素 B、艰难梭菌毒素和重复粪便检测。阅读了讨论艰难梭菌感染患者 EIA 的文章,并对相关的交叉引用内容进行了评估,以确定是否纳入。选择偏倚可能是本文选择或发现文章的方法存在的局限性。
应用 EIA 检测艰难梭菌毒素的重复检测证据正在减弱。最近发表的实践指南建议采用两步或三步检测算法来检测艰难梭菌。
EIA 检测艰难梭菌粪便毒素的敏感性有限,但无需重复进行粪便检测。目前的数据提示 EIA 检测可能不需要重复进行,但还不具有结论性。需要进一步研究和更好的检测方法来制定明确的指南,以确定在疑似艰难梭菌感染的诊断中需要进行多少次检测。与单独检测毒素 A&B EIA 相比,两步法或三步法在诊断艰难梭菌相关性腹泻时的敏感性显著提高。