Department of Physical Therapy, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA.
J Diabetes. 2010 Mar;2(1):41-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-0407.2009.00058.x. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
Electrical stimulation (ES) with heating is effective in healing chronic wounds. However, it this effect due to ES alone or both heating and ES? The aim of the present study was to deduce the individual roles of heat and ES in the healing of chronic wounds.
The study was performed on 20 patients (mean age 48.4 ± 14.6 years) with non-healing diabetic foot ulcers (mean duration 38.9 ± 23.7 months) who received local dry heat (37°C; n = 10) or local dry heat + ES (n = 10) three times a week for 4 weeks. Patients were given ES using biphasic sine wave stimulation (30 Hz, pulse width 250 μs, current approximately 20 mA).
Skin blood flow in and around the wound was measured with a laser Doppler flow imager. In the ES + heat group, the average wound area and volume decreased significantly by 68.4 ± 28.6% and 69.3 ± 27.1%, respectively (both P < 0.05), over the 1-month period. During the average session, blood flow increased to 102.3 ± 25.3% with local heat and to 152.3 ± 23.4% with ES + heat. In the group receiving treatment with local heat only, wounds that had not healed for at least 2 months showed 30.1 ± 22.6% healing (i.e. a decrease in wound area) after 1 month. Although this level of healing was significant, it was less than that observed in the ES + heat group (P<0.05).
Local dry heat and ES work well together to heal chronic diabetic foot wounds; however, local heat would appear to be a relevant part of this therapy because ES alone has produced little healing in previous studies.
电刺激(ES)加热对治疗慢性伤口有效。但是,这种效果是由 ES 单独作用还是加热和 ES 共同作用产生的呢?本研究旨在推断热和 ES 在慢性伤口愈合中的各自作用。
该研究纳入了 20 名(平均年龄 48.4 ± 14.6 岁)患有非愈合性糖尿病足溃疡(平均病程 38.9 ± 23.7 个月)的患者,他们每周接受 3 次局部干热(37°C;n = 10)或局部干热+ES(n = 10)治疗,共 4 周。患者接受双相正弦波刺激(30 Hz,脉冲宽度 250 μs,电流约 20 mA)进行 ES。
使用激光多普勒血流成像仪测量伤口周围和内部的皮肤血流。在 ES+热组中,在 1 个月的时间内,平均伤口面积和体积分别显著减少了 68.4 ± 28.6%和 69.3 ± 27.1%(均 P<0.05)。在平均疗程中,局部加热时血流量增加到 102.3 ± 25.3%,ES+热时增加到 152.3 ± 23.4%。在仅接受局部热治疗的组中,至少 2 个月未愈合的伤口在 1 个月后显示出 30.1 ± 22.6%的愈合(即伤口面积减小)。尽管这种愈合水平有显著意义,但小于 ES+热组(P<0.05)。
局部干热和 ES 联合治疗慢性糖尿病足溃疡效果良好;然而,局部热似乎是这种治疗的一个相关部分,因为在之前的研究中,ES 单独治疗几乎没有产生愈合效果。