Suppr超能文献

头影测量分析的比较:一种图片存档与通讯系统与手工描记法——初步研究。

A comparison of cephalometric measurements: a picture archiving and communication system versus the hand-tracing method--a preliminary study.

机构信息

Orthodontic Department, Ipswich Hospital, Suffolk, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2011 Aug;33(4):350-3. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq087. Epub 2010 Oct 5.

Abstract

Traditionally, cephalometric analysis has been carried out using a hand-tracing manual method. In imaging, picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) are information management systems used for the capture and measurement of medical and dental radiographs. Although not customized for lateral cephalometry, this study aimed to evaluate the cephalometric measurements made on screen using PACS compared with the conventional hand-tracing method. Six angular and four liner parameters were measured on five radiographs of four females and one male with an age range of 14-20 years. Analysis was completed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. For the electronic method, SNB (P=0.04) and lower incisor angle (P=0.05) were the only parameters found to be significantly different between the two operators. There was no significant difference between operators 1 and 2 for the hand-tracing method for any measurement. All measurements were comparable between the two methods. This preliminary study would suggest that using PACS may be an acceptable method for obtaining cephalometric measurements for treatment planning; however, further evaluation is necessary with a larger sample size.

摘要

传统上,头影测量分析是通过手工追踪的方法进行的。在影像学中,图像归档和通信系统(PACS)是用于捕获和测量医学和牙科射线照片的信息管理系统。虽然 PACS 不是专门为侧位头影测量设计的,但本研究旨在评估使用 PACS 在屏幕上进行的头影测量与传统的手工追踪方法相比的结果。对 4 名女性和 1 名男性的 5 张射线照片进行了 6 个角度和 4 个线性参数的测量,年龄范围为 14-20 岁。使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验完成了分析。对于电子方法,SNB(P=0.04)和下切牙角度(P=0.05)是两个操作者之间唯一发现有显著差异的参数。对于手工追踪方法,两个操作者之间没有任何测量参数存在显著差异。两种方法之间的所有测量值均具有可比性。这项初步研究表明,使用 PACS 可能是获得治疗计划头影测量值的一种可接受的方法;然而,需要进一步评估,样本量更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验