• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对以技术为重点的多方面干预措施的看法:一项定性分析。

Patients' perspectives of a multifaceted intervention with a focus on technology: a qualitative analysis.

作者信息

Lambert-Kerzner Anne, Havranek Edward P, Plomondon Mary E, Albright Karen, Moore Ashley, Gryniewicz Kelsey, Magid David, Ho P Michael

机构信息

Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, CO 80220, USA.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Nov;3(6):668-74. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.949800. Epub 2010 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.949800
PMID:20923992
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated the effectiveness of multifaceted interventions from the study participants' perspective. We conducted qualitative interviews to understand patients' experiences with a multifaceted blood pressure (BP) control intervention involving interactive voice response technology, home BP monitoring, and pharmacist-led BP management. In the randomized study, the intervention resulted in clinically significant decreases in BP.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used insights generated from in-depth interviews from all study participants randomly assigned to the multifaceted intervention or usual care (n=146) to create a model explaining the observed improvements in health behavior and clinical outcomes. The data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis methods and consultative and reflexive team analysis. Six explanatory factors emerged from the patients' interviews: (1) improved relationships with medical personnel; (2) increased knowledge of hypertension; (3) increased participation in their health care and personal empowerment; (4) greater understanding of the impact of health behavior on BP; (5) high satisfaction with technology used in the intervention; and, for some patients, (6) increased health care utilization. Eighty-six percent of the intervention patients and 62% of the usual care patients stated that study participation had a positive effect on them. Of those expressing a positive effect, 68% (intervention) and 55% (usual care) reached their systolic BP goal.

CONCLUSIONS

Establishing bidirectional conversations between patients and providers is a key element of successful hypertension management. Home BP monitoring coupled with interactive voice response technology reporting facilitates such conversations.

摘要

背景

很少有研究从研究参与者的角度调查多方面干预措施的有效性。我们进行了定性访谈,以了解患者在一项涉及交互式语音应答技术、家庭血压监测和药剂师主导的血压管理的多方面血压控制干预中的体验。在随机研究中,该干预导致血压出现临床上的显著下降。

方法与结果

我们利用对所有随机分配到多方面干预组或常规治疗组的研究参与者(n = 146)进行深入访谈所获得的见解,创建了一个模型,以解释在健康行为和临床结果方面观察到的改善情况。使用定性内容分析方法以及协商和反思性团队分析对数据进行了分析。患者访谈中出现了六个解释因素:(1)与医务人员的关系改善;(2)高血压知识增加;(3)对医疗保健的参与度和个人赋权增加;(4)对健康行为对血压影响的理解加深;(5)对干预中使用的技术高度满意;以及,对一些患者来说,(6)医疗保健利用率提高。86%的干预组患者和62%的常规治疗组患者表示参与研究对他们有积极影响。在那些表示有积极影响的患者中,68%(干预组)和55%(常规治疗组)达到了收缩压目标。

结论

在患者和提供者之间建立双向对话是成功管理高血压的关键要素。家庭血压监测与交互式语音应答技术报告相结合有助于此类对话。

相似文献

1
Patients' perspectives of a multifaceted intervention with a focus on technology: a qualitative analysis.患者对以技术为重点的多方面干预措施的看法:一项定性分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Nov;3(6):668-74. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.949800. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
2
A Successful Multifaceted Trial to Improve Hypertension Control in Primary Care: Why Did it Work?一项成功的多方面改善基层医疗中高血压控制的试验:为何奏效?
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov;30(11):1665-72. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3355-x.
3
Effect of home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management on blood pressure control: a cluster randomized clinical trial.家庭血压远程监测和药师管理对血压控制的影响:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2013 Jul 3;310(1):46-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.6549.
4
Personalized Hypertension Management Using Patient-Generated Health Data Integrated With Electronic Health Records (EMPOWER-H): Six-Month Pre-Post Study.使用整合电子健康记录的患者生成健康数据进行个性化高血压管理(EMPOWER-H):六个月前后研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 19;19(9):e311. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7831.
5
Effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring, Web communication, and pharmacist care on hypertension control: a randomized controlled trial.家庭血压监测、网络通信和药剂师护理对高血压控制的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2008 Jun 25;299(24):2857-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.24.2857.
6
Patient Experience in a Remote Patient Monitoring Program for Hypertension: A Qualitative Study.高血压远程患者监测项目中的患者体验:一项定性研究。
Am J Hypertens. 2024 Oct 14;37(11):861-867. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpae086.
7
Two self-management interventions to improve hypertension control: a randomized trial.两种自我管理干预措施对改善高血压控制的效果:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):687-95. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00148.
8
A pharmacist-led, American Heart Association Heart360 Web-enabled home blood pressure monitoring program.一项由药剂师主导、美国心脏协会支持的Heart360网络家庭血压监测项目。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Mar 1;6(2):157-63. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.968172. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
9
Stroke patients' perceptions of home blood pressure monitoring: a qualitative study.中风患者对家庭血压监测的看法:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Sep;61(590):e604-10. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X593893.
10
Barriers and facilitators to evidence-based blood pressure control in community practice.社区实践中基于证据的血压控制的障碍和促进因素。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;26(5):539-57. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.130060.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' perspectives on digital health tools.患者对数字健康工具的看法。
PEC Innov. 2023 May 26;2:100171. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100171. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Perspectives and Experiences of Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure Among Patients With Hypertension: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.高血压患者自我血压监测的观点和体验:定性研究的系统评价。
Am J Hypertens. 2023 Jun 15;36(7):372-384. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpad021.
3
A cross-sectional study of the knowledge and screening practices of diabetes among adults in a south western Nigerian city.
尼日利亚西南部城市成年人糖尿病知识和筛查实践的横断面研究。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2021 Jul 30;62(2):E529-E538. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2021.62.2.2059. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
SMS-facilitated home blood pressure monitoring: A qualitative analysis of resultant health behavior change.短信辅助家庭血压监测:对健康行为改变结果的定性分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Dec;102(12):2246-2253. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
5
Understanding short-term blood-pressure-variability phenotypes: from concept to clinical practice.理解短期血压变异性表型:从概念到临床实践。
Int J Gen Med. 2018 Jun 22;11:241-254. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S164903. eCollection 2018.
6
The ongoing saga of poor blood pressure measurement: Past, present, and future perspectives.血压测量不佳的持续故事:过去、现在和未来的视角。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017 Jun;19(6):611-613. doi: 10.1111/jch.13016. Epub 2017 May 2.
7
Using digital interventions for self-management of chronic physical health conditions: A meta-ethnography review of published studies.使用数字干预手段进行慢性身体健康状况的自我管理:已发表研究的元民族志综述
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Apr;100(4):616-635. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.019. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
8
Automated telephone communication systems for preventive healthcare and management of long-term conditions.用于预防性医疗保健和长期病症管理的自动电话通信系统。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 14;12(12):CD009921. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009921.pub2.
9
A pharmacist-led follow-up program for patients with coronary heart disease in North Norway--a qualitative study exploring patient experiences.挪威北部由药剂师主导的冠心病患者随访项目——一项探索患者体验的定性研究
BMC Res Notes. 2014 Mar 29;7:197. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-197.
10
Telephone follow-up in primary care: can interactive voice response calls work?基层医疗中的电话随访:交互式语音应答呼叫可行吗?
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:112-6.