• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对数字健康工具的看法。

Patients' perspectives on digital health tools.

作者信息

Madanian Samaneh, Nakarada-Kordic Ivana, Reay Stephen, Chetty T'heniel

机构信息

Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, School of Engineering, Computer and Mathematical Science, Auckland University of Technology (AUT), 6 St. Paul Street, AUT WZ Building, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.

Good Health Design, School of Art and Design, Auckland University of Technology (AUT), 27 St. Paul Street, AUT WE Building, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.

出版信息

PEC Innov. 2023 May 26;2:100171. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100171. eCollection 2023 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100171
PMID:37384154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10294099/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Digital technology has changed the way healthcare is delivered and accessed. However, the focus is mostly on technology and clinical aspects. This review aimed to integrate and critically analyse the available knowledge regarding patients' perspectives on digital health tools and identify facilitators and barriers to their uptake.

METHODS

A narrative review was conducted using the Scopus and Google Scholar databases. Information related to facilitators and barriers to uptake was synthesised and interpreted using thematic and content analyses, respectively.

RESULTS

Seventy-one out of 1722 articles identified were eligible for inclusion. Patient empowerment, self-management, and personalisation were identified as the main factors that contributed to patient uptake in using digital health tools. Digital literacy, health literacy, and privacy concerns were identified as barriers to the uptake of digital health technology.

CONCLUSION

Digital health technologies have changed the way healthcare is experienced by patients. Research highlights the disconnect between the development and implementation of digital health tools and the patients they are created for. This review may serve as the foundation for future research incorporating patients' perspectives to help increase patients' engagement with emerging technologies.

INNOVATION

Participatory design approaches have the potential to support the creation of patient-centred digital health tools.

摘要

目的

数字技术改变了医疗保健的提供和获取方式。然而,关注点大多集中在技术和临床方面。本综述旨在整合并批判性分析关于患者对数字健康工具看法的现有知识,并确定其采用的促进因素和障碍。

方法

使用Scopus和谷歌学术数据库进行叙述性综述。分别使用主题分析和内容分析对与采用的促进因素和障碍相关的信息进行综合和解读。

结果

在1722篇被识别的文章中,有71篇符合纳入标准。患者赋权、自我管理和个性化被确定为促进患者采用数字健康工具的主要因素。数字素养、健康素养和隐私担忧被确定为采用数字健康技术的障碍。

结论

数字健康技术改变了患者体验医疗保健的方式。研究凸显了数字健康工具的开发与实施和其针对的患者之间的脱节。本综述可为未来纳入患者观点的研究奠定基础,以帮助提高患者对新兴技术的参与度。

创新点

参与式设计方法有潜力支持以患者为中心的数字健康工具的创建。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2e6/10294099/3fb5942af655/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2e6/10294099/bb4637f6e396/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2e6/10294099/3fb5942af655/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2e6/10294099/bb4637f6e396/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2e6/10294099/3fb5942af655/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Patients' perspectives on digital health tools.患者对数字健康工具的看法。
PEC Innov. 2023 May 26;2:100171. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100171. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Usefulness of a Digitally Assisted Person-Centered Care Intervention: Qualitative Study of Patients' and Nurses' Experiences in a Long-term Perspective.数字辅助的以人为本的护理干预的效用:患者和护士长期体验的定性研究
JMIR Nurs. 2023 May 18;6:e46673. doi: 10.2196/46673.
3
Lessons for Vietnam on the Use of Digital Technologies to Support Patient-Centered Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries in the Asia-Pacific Region: Scoping Review.亚太地区中低收入国家利用数字技术支持以患者为中心的护理:范围综述 对越南的启示。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 5;25:e43224. doi: 10.2196/43224.
4
Understanding Technology Preferences and Requirements for Health Information Technologies Designed to Improve and Maintain the Mental Health and Well-Being of Older Adults: Participatory Design Study.了解旨在改善和维持老年人心理健康与幸福感的健康信息技术的技术偏好和需求:参与式设计研究
JMIR Aging. 2021 Jan 6;4(1):e21461. doi: 10.2196/21461.
5
Provider- and Patient-Related Barriers to and Facilitators of Digital Health Technology Adoption for Hypertension Management: Scoping Review.高血压管理中数字健康技术采用的提供者和患者相关障碍及促进因素:范围审查
JMIR Cardio. 2019 Mar 26;3(1):e11951. doi: 10.2196/11951.
6
Digital Health Tools for Managing Noncommunicable Diseases During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives of Patients and Caregivers.数字健康工具在 COVID-19 大流行期间和之后用于管理非传染性疾病:患者和照护者的观点。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 29;23(1):e25652. doi: 10.2196/25652.
7
Cancer Patients' Perspectives and Requirements of Digital Health Technologies: A Scoping Literature Review.癌症患者对数字健康技术的看法和需求:一项范围界定文献综述
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 21;16(13):2293. doi: 10.3390/cancers16132293.
8
Adoption of Digital Health Technologies in the Practice of Behavioral Health: Qualitative Case Study of Glucose Monitoring Technology.行为健康实践中数字健康技术的采用:血糖监测技术的定性案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 3;23(2):e18119. doi: 10.2196/18119.
9
The use of digital storytelling of patients' stories as an approach to translating knowledge: a scoping review.将患者故事的数字叙事作为一种知识转化方法的应用:一项范围综述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Aug 28;7(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00305-x.
10
Barriers and facilitators to patient uptake and utilisation of digital interventions for the self-management of low back pain: a systematic review of qualitative studies.阻碍和促进患者接受和利用数字干预措施进行低背痛自我管理的因素:定性研究的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 12;10(12):e038800. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038800.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of artificial intelligence-based ocular biomarkers in hepatobiliary diseases: A scoping review.基于人工智能的眼部生物标志物在肝胆疾病中的作用:一项范围综述。
World J Hepatol. 2025 Aug 27;17(8):109801. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i8.109801.
2
Smart Rings in Remote Monitoring at Home: Older Patients' Perceptions and Expectations.家庭远程监测中的智能戒指:老年患者的认知与期望
Health Expect. 2025 Oct;28(5):e70407. doi: 10.1111/hex.70407.
3
A cross-language analysis of urolithiasis patient online materials: Assessment across 24 European languages.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Wearable Sensors to Measure Goal Achievement in Older Veterans with Dementia.利用可穿戴传感器衡量老年痴呆症退伍军人的目标达成情况。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 16;22(24):9923. doi: 10.3390/s22249923.
2
Care4AD: A Technology-Driven Platform for Care Coordination and Management: Acceptability Study in Dementia.Care4AD:一个用于护理协调与管理的技术驱动平台:痴呆症的可接受性研究
Gerontology. 2023;69(2):227-238. doi: 10.1159/000526219. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
3
Reimagining digital healthcare with a patient-centric approach: The role of user experience (UX) research.
尿石症患者在线资料的跨语言分析:对24种欧洲语言的评估
Cent European J Urol. 2025;78(2):221-227. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2025.0045. Epub 2025 May 26.
4
Factors associated with distress over time in women with breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy: insights from a pilot study assessing a digital information tool.乳腺癌放疗女性随时间推移产生痛苦的相关因素:一项评估数字信息工具的试点研究的见解
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Aug 12;33(9):781. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09798-8.
5
Developing a Behavioral Phenotyping Layer for Artificial Intelligence-Driven Predictive Analytics in a Digital Resiliency Course: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.为数字适应能力课程中人工智能驱动的预测分析开发行为表型分析层:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 6;14:e73773. doi: 10.2196/73773.
6
Integrating Patient Choice and Collaborative Care Managers to Implement eHealth Tools in Depression: Self-Report Pilot Study.整合患者选择与协作护理经理以在抑郁症中实施电子健康工具:自我报告试点研究。
J Particip Med. 2025 Jul 31;17:e55349. doi: 10.2196/55349.
7
Telehealth for the Initial Evaluation of Musculoskeletal Disorders: Qualitative Study of Patients, Health Care Providers, and Key Stakeholders in the Province of Quebec in Canada.远程医疗用于肌肉骨骼疾病的初步评估:对加拿大魁北克省患者、医疗保健提供者及关键利益相关者的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 24;27:e72901. doi: 10.2196/72901.
8
The role of public and patient involvement in designing a web-based, physical activity application for individuals with severe mental illness.公众和患者参与为重度精神疾病患者设计基于网络的体育活动应用程序的作用。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 21;11(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00735-x.
9
Empowering Capabilities of People With Chronic Conditions Supported by Digital Health Technologies: Scoping Review.数字健康技术支持下慢性病患者的能力赋能:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 27;27:e68458. doi: 10.2196/68458.
10
Patient Perspectives on Technological Barriers and Implementation Strategies Leveraged During a Real-World Remote Symptom Monitoring Program.患者对现实世界远程症状监测项目中技术障碍及实施策略的看法
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2025 Jun;9:e2400232. doi: 10.1200/CCI-24-00232. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
以患者为中心的方法重塑数字医疗:用户体验(UX)研究的作用。
Front Digit Health. 2022 Aug 9;4:899976. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.899976. eCollection 2022.
4
Non-use of telemedicine: A scoping review.非使用远程医疗:范围综述。
Health Informatics J. 2021 Oct-Dec;27(4):14604582211043147. doi: 10.1177/14604582211043147.
5
Lack of Acceptance of Digital Healthcare in the Medical Market: Addressing Old Problems Raised by Various Clinical Professionals and Developing Possible Solutions.医疗市场对数字医疗的接受度不足:解决各临床专业人士提出的旧问题并提出可能的解决方案。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Sep 27;36(37):e253. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e253.
6
A Review of the Evidence and Recommendations on Communication Skills and the Patient-Provider Relationship: A Rome Foundation Working Team Report.证据回顾与沟通技巧及医患关系的建议:罗马基金会工作组报告。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Nov;161(5):1670-1688.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.07.037. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
7
Patient satisfaction and acceptability with telehealth at specialist medical outpatient clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia.澳大利亚 COVID-19 大流行期间,专科门诊的远程医疗服务的患者满意度和可接受性。
Intern Med J. 2021 Jul;51(7):1028-1037. doi: 10.1111/imj.15205. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
8
Patients' experiences and perspectives of a mobile phone text messaging intervention to improve dietary behaviours in haemodialysis.患者对改善血液透析患者饮食行为的手机短信干预措施的体验和看法。
Nutr Diet. 2021 Nov;78(5):516-523. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12667. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
9
Co-constructing engagement in pediatric rehabilitation: a multiple case study approach.共同构建儿科康复中的参与:多案例研究方法。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Aug;44(16):4429-4440. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1910353. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
10
How technology impacts communication between cancer patients and their health care providers: A systematic literature review.技术如何影响癌症患者及其医疗保健提供者之间的沟通:系统文献回顾。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 May;149:104430. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104430. Epub 2021 Feb 22.