Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and HTA.
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and HTA; National Expert and Training Centre for Breast Cancer Screening, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ann Oncol. 2011 Apr;22(4):863-869. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq447. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
Recent case-control studies on the effectiveness of population-based breast cancer screening show differences in the magnitude of breast cancer mortality reduction. We investigated the role played by aspects of the case-control study design on these differences, e.g. the definition of cases and exposure to screening.
We investigated six case-control studies conducted in East Anglia (UK), Wales, Iceland, central and northern Italy, South Australia and The Netherlands.
The breast cancer mortality reduction in the different case-control studies ranged from 38% to 70% in the screened versus the nonscreened women. We identified differences in design, e.g. the inclusion or exclusion of the first years of screening, and the correction factor for self-selection bias.
Overall, the design of the case-control studies was similar. The differences in the magnitude of breast cancer mortality reductions are therefore unlikely to be caused by variations in the design of the case-control studies. These differences must be due to other factors, like the organisation of the service screening programme and the attendance rate. The reduction in breast cancer mortality estimated in these case-control studies indicates that the impact of current mammographic screening is at least consistent with the effect reported by the former randomised screening trials.
最近的基于人群的乳腺癌筛查有效性的病例对照研究表明,乳腺癌死亡率降低的幅度存在差异。我们研究了病例对照研究设计的各个方面在这些差异中所起的作用,例如病例的定义和筛查暴露。
我们调查了在东安格利亚(英国)、威尔士、冰岛、意大利中北部、南澳大利亚和荷兰进行的六项病例对照研究。
不同病例对照研究中筛查组与未筛查组女性的乳腺癌死亡率降低幅度从 38%到 70%不等。我们发现了设计上的差异,例如是否纳入或排除筛查的最初几年,以及对自我选择偏差的校正因子。
总体而言,病例对照研究的设计相似。因此,乳腺癌死亡率降低幅度的差异不太可能是由病例对照研究设计的变化引起的。这些差异必须归因于其他因素,如服务筛查计划的组织和参与率。这些病例对照研究中估计的乳腺癌死亡率降低表明,当前乳腺 X 线筛查的影响至少与以前的随机筛查试验报告的效果一致。