Department of Laboratory Medicine, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Ohashi, Meguro, Tokyo, Japan.
Ann Clin Biochem. 2010 Nov;47(Pt 6):541-8. doi: 10.1258/acb.2010.010094. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate standard reference material (SRM) 1955 commutability as a reference material for serum folate using automated methods. We also designed so as to reduce the intermethod variability present in different automated methods.
Using a microbiological assay related to the 'information value' of SRM 1955 as a comparison method, we investigated the possibility of standardization for the assay values of serum folate as measured by the automated methods (Access, Centaur and Elecsys). In the assay of 50 patient sera by these automated methods, we corrected observed values by the SRM 1955 and compared with comparison values.
The observed values of SRM 1955 Levels I, II and III were within or outside (but near) a 95% prediction interval obtained from patient sera by the automated methods. The normalized residuals obtained from SRM 1955 were within ±3.0 (in SD units), which enabled us to conclude that the SRM 1955 had a physicochemical characterization similar to native serum. Twelve patients were assessed as hypofolataemia (<6.0 ng/mL) and 38 patients as normal (≥6.0 ng/mL). Before correction, folate levels in six of 12 patients were lower than 6.0 ng/mL, and those in seven of 38 patients were higher than 6.0 ng/mL with the automated methods. After correction, low levels were found in four of 12 patients, and normal levels were found in 33 of 38 patients.
The use of SRM 1955 would help to reduce the intermethod variability present in different automated methods for serum folate measurement.
本研究旨在评估标准参考物质(SRM)1955 的可互换性,以作为使用自动化方法检测血清叶酸的参考物质。我们还设计了一种方法,以减少不同自动化方法之间存在的方法间变异性。
使用与 SRM 1955 的“信息值”相关的微生物测定法作为比较方法,我们研究了通过自动化方法(Access、Centaur 和 Elecsys)标准化血清叶酸测定值的可能性。在这些自动化方法检测 50 例患者血清时,我们通过 SRM 1955 校正观察值,并与比较值进行比较。
SRM 1955 水平 I、II 和 III 的观察值在自动化方法检测的患者血清中获得的 95%预测区间内或之外(但接近)。从 SRM 1955 获得的归一化残差在±3.0(SD 单位)以内,这使我们能够得出结论,即 SRM 1955 具有与天然血清相似的物理化学特性。12 例患者被评估为低叶酸血症(<6.0ng/mL),38 例患者为正常(≥6.0ng/mL)。在未校正之前,用自动化方法检测,12 例患者中有 6 例的叶酸水平低于 6.0ng/mL,38 例患者中有 7 例的叶酸水平高于 6.0ng/mL。校正后,12 例患者中有 4 例的叶酸水平较低,38 例患者中有 33 例的叶酸水平正常。
使用 SRM 1955 将有助于减少不同自动化方法检测血清叶酸时存在的方法间变异性。