• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在考虑产妇和临床风险因素后,英国国民保健制度信托基金中剖宫产率的变化:横断面研究。

Variation in rates of caesarean section among English NHS trusts after accounting for maternal and clinical risk: cross sectional study.

机构信息

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2010 Oct 6;341:c5065. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5065.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.c5065
PMID:20926490
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2950923/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the variation in unadjusted rates of caesarean section derived from routine data in NHS trusts in England can be explained by maternal characteristics and clinical risk factors.

DESIGN

A cross sectional analysis using routinely collected hospital episode statistics was performed. A multiple logistic regression model was used to estimate the likelihood of women having a caesarean section given their maternal characteristics (age, ethnicity, parity, and socioeconomic deprivation) and clinical risk factors (previous caesarean section, breech presentation, and fetal distress). Adjusted rates of caesarean section for each NHS trust were produced from this model.

SETTING

146 English NHS trusts. Population Women aged between 15 and 44 years with a singleton birth between 1 January and 31 December 2008.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Rate of caesarean sections per 100 births (live or stillborn).

RESULTS

Among 620 604 singleton births, 147 726 (23.8%) were delivered by caesarean section. Women were more likely to have a caesarean section if they had had one previously (70.8%) or had a baby with breech presentation (89.8%). Unadjusted rates of caesarean section among the NHS trusts ranged from 13.6% to 31.9%. Trusts differed in their patient populations, but adjusted rates still ranged from 14.9% to 32.1%. Rates of emergency caesarean section varied between trusts more than rates of elective caesarean section.

CONCLUSION

Characteristics of women delivering at NHS trusts differ, and comparing unadjusted rates of caesarean section should be avoided. Adjusted rates of caesarean section still vary considerably and attempts to reduce this variation should examine issues linked to emergency caesarean section.

摘要

目的

确定在英格兰国民保健制度信托机构中从常规数据得出的未经调整剖宫产率的变化是否可以用产妇特征和临床危险因素来解释。

设计

使用常规收集的医院病例统计数据进行了横断面分析。使用多因素逻辑回归模型来估计给定产妇特征(年龄、种族、产次和社会经济剥夺)和临床危险因素(既往剖宫产、臀位和胎儿窘迫)的妇女行剖宫产的可能性。从该模型中生成每个国民保健制度信托机构的调整后剖宫产率。

设置

146 个英格兰国民保健制度信托机构。人群 15 至 44 岁之间的单胎妊娠,分娩时间为 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日。

主要结局测量

每 100 例分娩的剖宫产率(活产或死产)。

结果

在 620604 例单胎分娩中,有 147726 例(23.8%)行剖宫产。如果产妇曾行过剖宫产(70.8%)或婴儿臀位(89.8%),则更有可能行剖宫产。国民保健制度信托机构之间的剖宫产率未经调整的范围为 13.6%至 31.9%。各信托机构的患者人群存在差异,但调整后的剖宫产率仍在 14.9%至 32.1%之间。各信托机构之间的急诊剖宫产率差异大于选择性剖宫产率。

结论

在国民保健制度信托机构分娩的产妇特征不同,应避免比较未经调整的剖宫产率。尽管调整后的剖宫产率仍存在很大差异,但试图减少这种差异应检查与急诊剖宫产相关的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce79/4787691/c64e740a4b3a/braf738880.f4_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce79/4787691/e3b6cc0e1cc7/braf738880.f1_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce79/4787691/4ebfac902265/braf738880.f2_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce79/4787691/5867f617396e/braf738880.f3_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce79/4787691/c64e740a4b3a/braf738880.f4_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce79/4787691/e3b6cc0e1cc7/braf738880.f1_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce79/4787691/4ebfac902265/braf738880.f2_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce79/4787691/5867f617396e/braf738880.f3_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce79/4787691/c64e740a4b3a/braf738880.f4_default.jpg

相似文献

1
Variation in rates of caesarean section among English NHS trusts after accounting for maternal and clinical risk: cross sectional study.在考虑产妇和临床风险因素后,英国国民保健制度信托基金中剖宫产率的变化:横断面研究。
BMJ. 2010 Oct 6;341:c5065. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5065.
2
Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in Jamaica.牙买加剖宫产的患病率及影响因素
J Biosoc Sci. 1992 Oct;24(4):515-25. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000020071.
3
The timing of elective caesarean delivery between 2000 and 2009 in England.2000 年至 2009 年期间英国择期剖宫产的时机。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Jun 8;11:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-43.
4
A population-based cohort study of the effect of Caesarean section on subsequent fertility.基于人群的剖宫产术对后续生育力影响的队列研究。
Hum Reprod. 2014 Jun;29(6):1320-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu057. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
5
Comparison of maternal and perinatal morbidity between elective and emergency caesarean section in singleton-term breech presentation.择期与急症剖宫产在单胎足月臀位分娩中母婴发病率的比较。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 May;40(4):500-506. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1634018. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
6
Is a rising caesarean section rate inevitable?剖宫产率上升是不可避免的吗?
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Jan;105(1):45-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09349.x.
7
What are the implications for the next delivery in primigravidae who have an elective caesarean section for breech presentation?对于因臀位而行择期剖宫产的初产妇,下次分娩有哪些影响?
BJOG. 2002 Jun;109(6):624-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01365.x.
8
Variation in hospital caesarean section rates for women with at least one previous caesarean section: a population based cohort study.有至少一次剖宫产史的女性的医院剖宫产率差异:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Aug 19;15:179. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0609-x.
9
Elective caesarean section for breech presentation in first pregnancy and subsequent mode of labour.首次妊娠臀先露的择期剖宫产及后续分娩方式
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014 May;24(5):323-6.
10
Evaluating the 'Focus on Normal Birth and Reducing Caesarean section Rates Rapid Improvement Programme': A mixed method study in England.评估“关注正常分娩及降低剖宫产率快速改善计划”:英国的一项混合方法研究。
Midwifery. 2015 Feb;31(2):332-40. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
What Is the Safest Population-Level Caesarean Delivery Rate? A National Cohort Study Using Natural Variation.最安全的人群剖宫产率是多少?一项利用自然变异的全国队列研究。
BJOG. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18301.
2
The Safety and Effects of Pregnancy after Abdominoplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature.腹部整形术后妊娠的安全性和效果:文献系统评价。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Aug;47(4):1472-1479. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03423-x. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
3
Hospital variations in caesarean delivery rates: An analysis of national data in China, 2016-2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Cross-sectional reporting of previous Cesarean birth was validated using longitudinal linked data.使用纵向链接数据验证了既往剖宫产分娩的横断面报告。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;63(6):672-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.019. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
2
Monitoring the quality of maternity care: how well are labour and delivery events reported in population health data?监测孕产妇护理质量:人口健康数据中分娩事件的报告情况如何?
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009 Mar;23(2):144-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00980.x.
3
Package of care for active management in labour for reducing caesarean section rates in low-risk women.
医院剖宫产率的差异:中国 2016-2020 年全国数据的分析。
J Glob Health. 2023 Apr 7;13:04029. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04029.
4
Evaluation of Cesarean Rates for Term, Singleton, Live Vertex Deliveries in China in 2020 Among Women With No Prior Cesarean Delivery.2020 年中国无剖宫产史的足月、单胎、头位活产产妇的剖宫产率评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e234521. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4521.
5
Exploring the impact of indication on variation in rates of intrapartum caesarean section in six Palestinian hospitals: a prospective cohort study.探讨 6 家巴勒斯坦医院中,产时剖宫产率差异的影响因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Dec 2;22(1):892. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05196-8.
6
Does hospital variation in intrapartum-related perinatal mortality among caesarean births reflect differences in quality of care? Cross-sectional study in 21 hospitals in Burkina Faso.剖宫产术中相关围产儿死亡率在医院间的差异是否反映了护理质量的差异?布基纳法索 21 家医院的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 6;12(10):e055241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055241.
7
Timing of Breastfeeding Initiation Mediates the Association between Delivery Mode, Source of Breastfeeding Education, and Postpartum Depression Symptoms.母乳喂养启动时间中介了分娩方式、母乳喂养教育来源与产后抑郁症状之间的关联。
Nutrients. 2022 Jul 19;14(14):2959. doi: 10.3390/nu14142959.
8
Mode of delivery and maternal sexual wellbeing: A longitudinal study.分娩方式与产妇性健康:一项纵向研究。
BJOG. 2022 Nov;129(12):2010-2018. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17262. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
9
Use of induction of labour and emergency caesarean section and perinatal outcomes in English maternity services: a national hospital-level study.英国产科服务中引产及急诊剖宫产的使用情况与围产期结局:一项全国性医院层面的研究
BJOG. 2022 Apr 21;129(11):1899-906. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17193.
10
A Cross-Sectional Study to Assess the Frequency and Risk Factors Associated with Cesarean Section in Southern Punjab, Pakistan.一项在巴基斯坦旁遮普南部评估剖宫产频率及相关危险因素的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 21;18(16):8812. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168812.
用于降低低风险产妇剖宫产率的产时积极管理护理包。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8(4):CD004907. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004907.pub2.
4
Maternal and neonatal effects of caesarean section.剖宫产对母婴的影响。
BMJ. 2007 Nov 17;335(7628):1003-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39372.587650.80. Epub 2007 Oct 30.
5
Association of caesarean delivery for first birth with placenta praevia and placental abruption in second pregnancy.初产剖宫产与再次妊娠前置胎盘及胎盘早剥的相关性
BJOG. 2007 May;114(5):609-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01295.x. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
6
Caesarean Section. Clinical Guideline. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health: commissioned by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence.剖宫产。临床指南。国家妇女和儿童健康合作中心:由国家临床优化研究所委托制定。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1(3):198-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2004.04060.x.
7
Cesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality in low-, medium-, and high-income countries: an ecological study.低收入、中等收入和高收入国家的剖宫产率及孕产妇和新生儿死亡率:一项生态学研究。
Birth. 2006 Dec;33(4):270-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00118.x.
8
Quality of diagnosis and procedure coding in ICD-10 administrative data.ICD - 10管理数据中诊断和程序编码的质量
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11):1011-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000228018.48783.34.
9
Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery.产后孕产妇死亡率与剖宫产
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;108(3 Pt 1):541-8. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000233154.62729.24.
10
Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparison of primary cesarean section rates: need, validity and parsimony.剖宫产率医院间比较的风险调整:必要性、有效性和简约性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug 15;6:100. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-100.