Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Drive, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1K 3M4.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2010 Nov 21;12(43):14515-26. doi: 10.1039/c0cp00550a. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
The (gas-phase) MP2/6-31G*(0.25) π···π stacking interactions between the five natural bases and the aromatic amino acids calculated using (truncated) monomers composed of conjugated rings and/or (extended) monomers containing the biological backbone (either the protein backbone or deoxyribose sugar) were previously compared. Although preliminary energetic results indicated that the protein backbone strengthens, while the deoxyribose sugar either strengthens or weakens, the interaction calculated using truncated models, the reasons for these effects were unknown. The present work explains these observations by dissecting the interaction energy of the extended complexes into individual backbone···π and π···π components. Our calculations reveal that the total interaction energy of the extended complex can be predicted as a sum of the backbone···π and π···π components, which indicates that the biological backbone does not significantly affect the ring system through π-polarization. Instead, we find that the backbone can indirectly affect the magnitude of the π···π contribution by changing the relative ring orientations in extended dimers compared with truncated dimers. Furthermore, the strengths of the individual backbone···π contributions are determined to be significant (up to 18 kJ mol(-1)). Therefore, the origin of the energetic change upon model extension is found to result from a balance between an additional (attractive) backbone···π component and differences in the strength of the π···π interaction. In addition, to understand the effects of the biological backbone on the stacking interactions at DNA-protein interfaces in nature, we analyzed the stacking interactions found in select DNA-protein crystal structures, and verified that an additive approach can be used to examine the strength of these interactions in biological complexes. Interestingly, although the presence of attractive backbone···π contacts is qualitatively confirmed using the quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM), QTAIM electron density analysis is unable to quantitatively predict the additive relationship of these interactions. Most importantly, this work reveals that both the backbone···π and π···π components must be carefully considered to accurately determine the overall stability of DNA-protein assemblies.
先前曾使用由共轭环组成的(截断)单体或含有生物主链(蛋白质主链或脱氧核糖糖)的(扩展)单体计算了五种天然碱基与芳香族氨基酸之间的(气相)MP2/6-31G*(0.25)π···π堆积相互作用。尽管初步的能量结果表明,蛋白质主链会增强相互作用,而脱氧核糖糖则会增强或减弱计算得到的截断模型的相互作用,但这些影响的原因尚不清楚。本工作通过将扩展复合物的相互作用能分解为单个主链···π和π···π分量,解释了这些观察结果。我们的计算表明,扩展复合物的总相互作用能可以预测为主链···π和π···π分量的和,这表明生物主链不会通过π-极化显著影响环系统。相反,我们发现通过与截断二聚体相比,改变扩展二聚体中环的相对取向,主链可以间接影响π···π贡献的大小。此外,确定单个主链···π贡献的强度非常重要(高达 18 kJ mol(-1))。因此,模型扩展引起的能量变化的起源是由于额外的(吸引)主链···π分量和π···π相互作用强度的差异之间的平衡。此外,为了了解生物主链对天然 DNA-蛋白质界面堆积相互作用的影响,我们分析了在选定的 DNA-蛋白质晶体结构中发现的堆积相互作用,并验证了可以使用加和方法来研究这些相互作用在生物复合物中的强度。有趣的是,尽管使用原子在分子中的量子理论(QTAIM)定性地证实了存在吸引性的主链···π接触,但 QTAIM 电子密度分析无法定量预测这些相互作用的加和关系。最重要的是,这项工作表明,必须仔细考虑主链···π和π···π分量,以准确确定 DNA-蛋白质组装体的整体稳定性。