Peters Christie Provost
National Health Policy Forum, Washington, D.C., USA.
Issue Brief George Wash Univ Natl Health Policy Forum. 2010 Sep 30(839):1-16.
Medicaid payment for generic prescription drugs has been a point of contention for the pharmacy industry over the past few years because of reimbursement formula changes contained in the Deficit Reduction Act (DRA) of 2005. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) includes provisions to resolve some of these issues. The DRA reduced the maximum amount the federal government would pay state Medicaid programs for generic drugs, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid services (CMS) final regulation, to implement the DRA provisions was met with a lawsuit from the pharmacy industry. An injunction by the federal district court, followed by a congressional moratorium, kept CMS from implementing the regulation and kept the pre-DRA formula for the generic drug payment limit in place. PPACA provisions increase maximum federal reimbursement levels for Medicaid generic drugs, but the impact on the pharmacy industry depends on CMS implementation and state policies. This paper examines Medicaid payment for generic drugs, the DRA and PPACA changes to generic drug reimbursement, the concerns of the pharmacy industry, and the potential impact on access.
在过去几年里,由于2005年《减赤法案》(DRA)中包含的报销公式变更,医疗补助计划对通用处方药的支付一直是制药行业争论的焦点。《患者保护与平价医疗法案》(PPACA)包含了解决其中一些问题的条款。《减赤法案》降低了联邦政府向各州医疗补助计划支付通用药物的最高金额,而医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)为实施《减赤法案》条款发布的最终规定遭到了制药行业的诉讼。联邦地方法院发布的禁令,随后国会的暂停令,使得CMS无法实施该规定,并维持了《减赤法案》之前的通用药物支付限额公式。《患者保护与平价医疗法案》的条款提高了医疗补助通用药物的联邦最高报销水平,但对制药行业的影响取决于CMS的实施情况和各州政策。本文探讨了医疗补助对通用药物的支付、《减赤法案》和《患者保护与平价医疗法案》对通用药物报销的变更、制药行业的担忧以及对药物可及性的潜在影响。