Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2011 Aug;101(8):1444-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300054. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
We assessed whether state Medicaid preferred drug lists are concordant with the World Health Organization's 2009 16th Essential Medicines List and with each other. We also characterized listed medicines by generic availability and appearance on treatment guidelines.
We derived generic availability and first-line treatment status from the US Food and Drug Administration's Orange Book and the 2004-2009 National Health Service National Institute for Clinical Excellence guidelines. We report characteristics of Essential Medicines List and preferred drug list (PDL)-only medicines and describe differences between medicines that are frequently and infrequently listed on PDLs.
Only 6 of 120 Essential Medicines List medicines appeared on fewer than 50% of PDLs. PDL-only medicines (n = 249) were less likely than were Essential Medicines List medicines (n = 120) to have generic versions available (56% vs 76%) and to be first-line treatments (21% vs 41%). The content of PDLs was variable: 33% of medicines appeared on 80% to 100% of PDLs.
Application of the essential medicines concept to Medicaid PDLs could reduce costs and provide more equitable and evidence-based health care to low-income patients in the United States.
我们评估了州医疗补助计划的首选药物清单是否与世界卫生组织 2009 年第 16 份基本药物清单以及彼此之间相协调。我们还根据通用可用性和治疗指南中的出现情况对列出的药物进行了分类。
我们从美国食品和药物管理局的橙皮书和 2004-2009 年国家卫生服务部国家临床卓越研究所指南中得出通用可用性和一线治疗地位。我们报告基本药物清单和首选药物清单(PDL)中仅包含药物的特征,并描述了在 PDL 上经常和不常列出的药物之间的差异。
仅有 120 种基本药物清单中的 6 种药物出现在不到 50%的 PDL 上。与基本药物清单药物(n=120)相比,PDL 中仅包含的药物(n=249)更不可能有通用版本(56%对 76%),也不太可能是一线治疗药物(21%对 41%)。PDL 的内容是可变的:33%的药物出现在 80%到 100%的 PDL 上。
将基本药物概念应用于医疗补助 PDL 可以降低成本,并为美国低收入患者提供更公平和基于证据的医疗保健。