• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

因接触环境烟草烟雾导致的直接健康成本和因实施禁烟令带来的间接健康益处。

Direct health costs of environmental tobacco smoke exposure and indirect health benefits due to smoking ban introduction.

机构信息

Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2011 Jun;21(3):316-22. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq142. Epub 2010 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckq142
PMID:20929904
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Introducing comprehensive smoke-free policies to public places is expected to reduce health costs. This includes prevented health damages by avoiding environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure as well as indirect health benefits from reduced tobacco consumption.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to estimate direct health costs of ETS exposure in public places and indirect health benefits from reduced tobacco consumption. We calculated attributable hospital days and years of life lost (YLL), based on the observed passive smoking and disease rates in Switzerland. The exposure-response associations of all relevant health outcomes were derived by meta-analysis from prospective cohort studies in order to calculate the direct health costs. To assess the indirect health benefits, a meta-analysis of smoking ban studies on hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction was conducted.

RESULTS

ETS exposure in public places in Switzerland causes 32,000 preventable hospital days (95% CI: 10,000-61,000), 3000 YLL (95% CI: 1000-5000), corresponding to health costs of 330 Mio CHF. The number of hospital days for ischaemic heart disease attributable to passive smoking is much larger if derived from smoking ban studies (41,000) than from prospective cohort studies (3200), resulting in additional health costs of 89 Mio CHF, which are attributed to the indirect health benefits of a smoking ban introduction.

CONCLUSION

The example of smoking ban studies on ischaemic heart disease hospitalization rates suggests that total health costs that can be prevented with smoking bans are considerably larger than the costs arising from the direct health impact of ETS exposure in public places.

摘要

背景

在公共场所引入全面禁烟政策有望降低卫生成本。这包括通过避免接触环境烟草烟雾(ETS)以及减少烟草消费带来的间接健康益处来预防健康损害。

方法

本研究旨在估计公共场所 ETS 暴露的直接健康成本和减少烟草消费带来的间接健康益处。我们根据瑞士观察到的被动吸烟和疾病率,计算了归因于医院住院日和生命损失年(YLL)。所有相关健康结果的暴露-反应关联均通过前瞻性队列研究的荟萃分析得出,以计算直接健康成本。为了评估间接健康益处,对急性心肌梗死住院的禁烟研究进行了荟萃分析。

结果

瑞士公共场所的 ETS 暴露导致 32000 例可预防的医院住院日(95%CI:10000-61000)和 3000 例 YLL(95%CI:1000-5000),相应的健康成本为 3.30 亿瑞士法郎。如果从禁烟研究中得出,归因于被动吸烟的缺血性心脏病住院天数(41000)比从前瞻性队列研究中得出的要大得多(3200),这导致额外的健康成本 8900 万瑞士法郎,归因于禁烟引入的间接健康益处。

结论

以缺血性心脏病住院率的禁烟研究为例,可通过禁烟预防的总健康成本远远大于公共场所 ETS 暴露直接健康影响所产生的成本。

相似文献

1
Direct health costs of environmental tobacco smoke exposure and indirect health benefits due to smoking ban introduction.因接触环境烟草烟雾导致的直接健康成本和因实施禁烟令带来的间接健康益处。
Eur J Public Health. 2011 Jun;21(3):316-22. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq142. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
2
The potential of smoking cessation programmes and a smoking ban in public places: comparing gain in life expectancy and cost effectiveness.戒烟计划和公共场所禁烟的潜力:比较预期寿命的增加和成本效益。
Scand J Public Health. 2011 Dec;39(8):785-96. doi: 10.1177/1403494811421416. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
3
Perceived justice and popular support for public health laws: a case study around comprehensive smoke-free legislation in Mexico City.公众对公共卫生法律的感知正义和支持:以墨西哥城全面无烟立法为例的案例研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Mar;70(5):787-93. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.064. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
4
Cardiovascular health and economic effects of smoke-free workplaces.无烟工作场所对心血管健康和经济的影响。
Am J Med. 2004 Jul 1;117(1):32-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.02.029.
5
The impact of public smoking ban on the incidence of myocardial infarction hospitalizations.公共场所禁烟对心肌梗死住院发病率的影响。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2010 Summer;11(3):e121-9. doi: 10.3909/ricm0540.
6
[Secondhand smoke in hospitality venues. Exposure, body burden, economic and health aspects in conjunction with smoking bans].[酒店场所中的二手烟。与禁烟相关的暴露、体内负荷、经济和健康方面]
Gesundheitswesen. 2009 Apr;71(4):242-57. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1192031. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
7
Does the workplace-smoking ban eliminate differences in risk for environmental tobacco smoke exposure at work?工作场所禁烟是否消除了工作环境中接触烟草烟雾风险的差异?
Health Policy. 2009 Oct;92(2-3):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.03.009. Epub 2009 Apr 26.
8
Assessment of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in young adolescents following implementation of smoke-free policy in Italy.评估意大利实施无烟政策后青少年接触环境烟草烟雾的情况。
Forensic Sci Int. 2010 Mar 20;196(1-3):97-100. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.12.041. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
9
Where there's no smoke: popular smoke-free laws curbing active, passive smoking.无烟之地:遏制主动和被动吸烟的流行无烟法律
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Jul 21;96(14):1058-60. doi: 10.1093/jnci/96.14.1058.
10
After the smoke has cleared: evaluation of the impact of a new national smoke-free law in New Zealand.尘埃落定之后:新西兰一项新的全国无烟法律的影响评估
Tob Control. 2008 Feb;17(1):e2. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.020347.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of passive smoking exposure on risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.被动吸烟暴露对 2 型糖尿病发病风险的影响:前瞻性队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 31;14:1195354. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1195354. eCollection 2023.
2
Signs, Fines and Compliance Officers: A Systematic Review of Strategies for Enforcing Smoke-Free Policy.标志、罚款和合规官员:强化无烟政策执行策略的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 2;15(7):1386. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071386.
3
Changing the smoking habit: prevalence, knowledge and attitudes among Umbrian hospital healthcare professionals.
改变吸烟习惯:翁布里亚医院医护人员的患病率、知识水平和态度
J Prev Med Hyg. 2017 Mar;58(1):E72-E78.
4
Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and diabetes in adult never-smokers.成年不吸烟者的环境烟草烟雾暴露与糖尿病
Environ Health. 2014 Sep 25;13:74. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-13-74.
5
An international smoking ban-how many lives will be saved?国际禁烟令——能挽救多少生命?
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2014 Jun;16(6):418. doi: 10.1007/s11883-014-0418-0.
6
How long is the yardstick for smoking bans in Switzerland?瑞士吸烟禁令的标准是什么?
Int J Public Health. 2013 Dec;58(6):797-8. doi: 10.1007/s00038-013-0516-8.
7
Burden of household environmental tobacco smoke on medical expenditure for Japanese women: a population-based cohort study.家庭环境烟草烟雾对日本女性医疗支出的负担:一项基于人群的队列研究。
J Epidemiol. 2013;23(1):55-62. doi: 10.2188/jea.je20120072. Epub 2012 Nov 24.