Centre of Expertise for Health and Work Ability, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Topeliuksenkatu 41 a A, FI-00250 Helsinki, Finland.
Eur J Pain. 2011 Apr;15(4):432-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.09.005. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
Among 385 female kitchen workers, we examined (1) whether mental stress and psychosocial factors at work (job control, skill discretion, supervisor support, co-worker relationships, and hurry) predict multiple-site musculoskeletal pain (MSP; defined as pain at ≥ 3 of seven sites) and (2) reversedly, whether MSP predicts these psychosocial factors. Data were collected by questionnaire at 3-month intervals during 2 years. Trajectory analysis was applied. Four trajectories of MSP prevalence emerged: Low, Descending, Ascending, and High. For the psychosocial factors, a two-trajectory model (Ascending or High vs. Low) yielded the best fit. In logistic regression analysis, with the Low MSP trajectory as reference, poor co-worker relationships (odds ratio [OR] 3.9), mental stress (3.1) and hurry (2.1) at baseline predicted belonging to the High MSP trajectory. Also MSP at baseline predicted the trajectories (Ascending vs. Low) of low job control (2.2) and mental stress (3.2). Adverse changes in most psychosocial factors were associated with belonging to the High (ORs between 2.3 and 8.6) and Ascending (2.7-5.5) MSP trajectories. In generalized estimating equations, time-lagged by 3 months, all psychosocial factors but two predicted MSP (1.4-2.1), allowing, e.g. for MSP at baseline, and vice versa, MSP predicted low job control, low supervisor support, and mental stress (1.4-2.0), after adjustment for e.g. the relevant psychosocial factor at baseline. In conclusion, we found that several psychosocial factors predicted MSP and that MSP predicted several psychosocial factors. The results suggest a cumulative process in which adverse psychosocial factors and MSP influence each other.
在 385 名女性厨房工作人员中,我们研究了(1)工作中的精神压力和心理社会因素(工作控制、技能判断、主管支持、同事关系和匆忙)是否预测多部位肌肉骨骼疼痛(MSP;定义为≥ 7 个部位中的 3 个部位疼痛),以及(2)相反,MSP 是否预测这些心理社会因素。数据是在 2 年内每隔 3 个月通过问卷调查收集的。应用轨迹分析。出现了 MSP 患病率的四个轨迹:低、下降、上升和高。对于心理社会因素,采用两轨迹模型(上升或高与低)拟合度最佳。在逻辑回归分析中,以低 MSP 轨迹为参考,基线时较差的同事关系(比值比 [OR] 3.9)、精神压力(3.1)和匆忙(2.1)预测属于高 MSP 轨迹。基线时的 MSP 也预测了低工作控制(2.2)和精神压力(3.2)的轨迹(上升与低)。大多数心理社会因素的不利变化与属于高(OR 为 2.3 至 8.6)和上升(2.7-5.5)MSP 轨迹有关。在广义估计方程中,通过 3 个月的时间滞后,除了两个因素外,所有心理社会因素都预测了 MSP(1.4-2.1),例如,考虑到基线时的 MSP,反之亦然,MSP 预测了低工作控制、低主管支持和精神压力(1.4-2.0),在调整基线时的相关心理社会因素后。总之,我们发现一些心理社会因素预测了 MSP,而 MSP 预测了一些心理社会因素。结果表明,不良的心理社会因素和 MSP 相互影响,存在累积过程。