da Costa J M, Esteves M, Morais C, Fernandes F, do Rosário E, da Cunha J C, Camilo V, Vagueiro M C, Amram S S
Internato Complementar de Cardiologia, Hospital de Santa Maria.
Rev Port Cardiol. 1990 Dec;9(12):963-7.
The authors selected 37 permanent pacemaker patients followed for eleven successive months, with symptomatology eventually related to the pacing system. An Holter ambulatory monitorization was performed to all of them during 24 hours. Twenty one had single chamber systems and the others double chamber. Twelve malfunctions were found in ten patients. Six due to "undersensing", 4 related to "oversensing", and 2 from loss of capture. Two patients had tachycardia pacemaker mediated. An inadequate mode of pacing was found in other two cases. Fifteen rhythm disturbances not related to the pacemaker systems were registered in thirteen patients: supra-ventricular in 9; ventricular greater than or equal to 3 degree of lown in 5; and 2nd degree A.V.B. Mobitz type I in one case. Four patients were submitted to surgical intervention in order to modify the mode of pacing. It was also necessary to reprogram ten patients. The Holter Ambulatory Electrocardiography revealed to be an important diagnostic method for the detection of intermittent malfunction of pacing systems. The occasional changes of cardiac rhythm not linked with pacing were also revealed.
作者选取了37例永久性起搏器患者,连续随访11个月,其症状最终与起搏系统相关。对所有患者均进行了24小时动态心电图监测。其中21例为单腔系统,其余为双腔系统。在10例患者中发现了12次故障。6次因“感知不足”,4次与“感知过度”有关,2次为夺获失败。2例患者发生起搏器介导的心动过速。另外2例发现起搏模式不当。在13例患者中记录到15次与起搏器系统无关的心律失常:9例为室上性;5例为心室性且大于或等于三度房室传导阻滞;1例为二度Ⅰ型房室传导阻滞。4例患者接受了手术干预以改变起搏模式。对10例患者进行重新编程也很有必要。动态心电图监测显示是检测起搏系统间歇性故障的重要诊断方法。还发现了与起搏无关的心脏节律偶尔变化。