• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

做梦与清醒:再探相似与差异。

Dreaming and waking: similarities and differences revisited.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA 95053, United States.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 2011 Sep;20(3):494-514. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.002. Epub 2010 Oct 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.002
PMID:20933437
Abstract

Dreaming is often characterized as lacking high-order cognitive (HOC) skills. In two studies, we test the alternative hypothesis that the dreaming mind is highly similar to the waking mind. Multiple experience samples were obtained from late-night REM sleep and waking, following a systematic protocol described in Kahan (2001). Results indicated that reported dreaming and waking experiences are surprisingly similar in their cognitive and sensory qualities. Concurrently, ratings of dreaming and waking experiences were markedly different on questions of general reality orientation and logical organization (e.g., the bizarreness or typicality of the events, actions, and locations). Consistent with other recent studies (e.g., Bulkeley & Kahan, 2008; Kozmová & Wolman, 2006), experiences sampled from dreaming and waking were more similar with respect to their process features than with respect to their structural features.

摘要

梦境通常被认为缺乏高级认知(HOC)技能。在两项研究中,我们检验了替代假设,即做梦的大脑与清醒的大脑非常相似。按照 Kahan(2001)描述的系统方案,从 REM 睡眠和清醒的深夜中获得多个体验样本。结果表明,报告的梦境和清醒体验在认知和感官质量上惊人地相似。同时,在一般现实定向和逻辑组织问题上(例如,事件、行动和地点的怪诞或典型性),对梦境和清醒体验的评价明显不同。与其他最近的研究一致(例如,Bulkeley & Kahan,2008;Kozmová & Wolman,2006),与结构特征相比,从梦境和清醒中采样的体验在过程特征上更为相似。

相似文献

1
Dreaming and waking: similarities and differences revisited.做梦与清醒:再探相似与差异。
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Sep;20(3):494-514. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.002. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
2
Similarities and differences between dreaming and waking cognition: an exploratory study.梦境与清醒认知之间的异同:一项探索性研究。
Conscious Cogn. 1997 Mar;6(1):132-47. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1996.0274.
3
The neural substrate for dreaming: is it a subsystem of the default network?做梦的神经基础:它是默认网络的一个子系统吗?
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1163-74. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
4
REM sleep and dreaming: towards a theory of protoconsciousness.快速眼动睡眠与梦境:迈向原意识理论
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Nov;10(11):803-13. doi: 10.1038/nrn2716. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
5
Dreaming in the late morning: summation of REM and diurnal cortical activation.清晨做梦:快速眼动睡眠与日间皮质激活的总和。
Conscious Cogn. 1995 Sep;4(3):275-99. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1995.1039.
6
Terror and bliss? Commonalities and distinctions between sleep paralysis, lucid dreaming, and their associations with waking life experiences.恐惧与极乐?睡眠瘫痪症、清醒梦及其与现实生活经历的关联之间的共性与差异。
J Sleep Res. 2017 Feb;26(1):38-47. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12441. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
7
Motivation and affect in REM sleep and the mentation reporting process.快速眼动睡眠中的动机与情感以及梦象报告过程。
Conscious Cogn. 2004 Sep;13(3):501-11. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2004.03.002.
8
Characteristics and contents of dreams.梦境的特点和内容。
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2010;92:135-54. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(10)92007-2.
9
Smooth tracking of visual targets distinguishes lucid REM sleep dreaming and waking perception from imagination.视觉目标的平滑跟踪将 REM 睡眠中清晰的梦境和清醒时的感知与想象区分开来。
Nat Commun. 2018 Aug 17;9(1):3298. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05547-0.
10
Physiology and psychology of dreams.梦的生理学与心理学
Semin Neurol. 2005 Mar;25(1):97-105. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-867078.

引用本文的文献

1
We are the Sensors of Consciousness! A Review and Analysis on How Awakenings During Sleep Influence Dream Recall.我们是意识的感知者!关于睡眠中的觉醒如何影响梦境回忆的综述与分析
Nat Sci Sleep. 2025 Apr 30;17:709-729. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S506461. eCollection 2025.
2
The Phenomenology of Offline Perception: Multisensory Profiles of Voluntary Mental Imagery and Dream Imagery.离线感知的现象学:自愿心理意象和梦境意象的多感官特征
Vision (Basel). 2025 Apr 21;9(2):37. doi: 10.3390/vision9020037.
3
Dreams share phenomenological similarities with task-unrelated thoughts and relate to variation in trait rumination and COVID-19 concern.
梦境与与任务无关的思维在现象学上具有相似性,并与特质反刍和对 COVID-19 的担忧的变化有关。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 2;13(1):7102. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33767-y.
4
Olfaction-Related Factors Affecting Chemosensory Dream Content in a Sleep Laboratory.睡眠实验室中影响嗅觉相关梦境内容的嗅觉相关因素
Brain Sci. 2021 Sep 16;11(9):1225. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11091225.
5
Relationship Between Epilepsy and Dreaming: Current Knowledge, Hypotheses, and Perspectives.癫痫与做梦之间的关系:当前的认识、假说及观点
Front Neurosci. 2021 Sep 6;15:717078. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.717078. eCollection 2021.
6
Relationships between Dream and Previous Wake Emotions Assessed through the Italian Modified Differential Emotions Scale.通过意大利修订版差异情绪量表评估梦与先前清醒时情绪之间的关系。
Brain Sci. 2020 Sep 29;10(10):690. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10100690.
7
Key Concepts in Dream Research: Cognition and Consciousness Are Inherently Linked, but Do No Not Control "Control"!梦境研究中的关键概念:认知与意识本质上相互关联,但并不控制“控制”! (注:原文中“but do no not control”表述有误,正确应为“but do not control” )
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Jul 17;14:259. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00259. eCollection 2020.
8
Reactions to Dream Content: Continuity and Non-continuity.对梦境内容的反应:连续性与非连续性。
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 3;10:2676. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02676. eCollection 2019.
9
Increased Awakenings From Non-rapid Eye Movement Sleep Explain Differences in Dream Recall Frequency in Healthy Individuals.非快速眼动睡眠中觉醒次数增加解释了健康个体梦回忆频率的差异。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Oct 15;13:370. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00370. eCollection 2019.
10
Increased lucid dream frequency in long-term meditators but not following MBSR training.长期冥想者的清醒梦频率增加,但参加正念减压疗法(MBSR)培训后则不然。
Psychol Conscious (Wash D C). 2019 Mar;6(1):40-54. doi: 10.1037/cns0000176. Epub 2018 Nov 29.