• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

遭受性虐待的男童和女童在法律结果上的差异。

Differences in legal outcomes for male and female children who have been sexually abused.

机构信息

Willamette University, Salem, OR 97301, USA.

出版信息

Sex Abuse. 2010 Dec;22(4):427-42. doi: 10.1177/1079063210375973. Epub 2010 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1177/1079063210375973
PMID:20935340
Abstract

The goal of the present study was to determine whether or not there were sex differences in legal outcomes for children who were sexually abused. Using the methodology of Joa and Edelson (2004), the results indicated that males who were sexually abused had poorer legal outcomes than females. Specifically, it was found that cases involving male victims were less likely to be filed with the District Attorney (DA) than cases involving female victims and had fewer criminal counts charged. For those children seen at a Child Abuse Assessment Center, cases involving female victims were significantly more likely to be filed by the DA's office than were cases involving male victims. Finally, there were differences in whether guilty defendants pled guilty or were found guilty at trial depending on whether the defendant sexually abused a male or female. The implications of the findings are discussed.

摘要

本研究旨在确定性虐待儿童的法律结果是否存在性别差异。采用乔和埃德尔森(2004 年)的方法,结果表明,遭受性虐待的男性比女性的法律结果更差。具体而言,发现涉及男性受害者的案件比涉及女性受害者的案件更不可能向地方检察官(DA)提起诉讼,而且被指控的犯罪罪名也更少。对于在儿童虐待评估中心就诊的儿童,涉及女性受害者的案件比涉及男性受害者的案件更有可能被 DA 办公室提起诉讼。最后,根据被告是否对男性或女性进行性虐待,有罪被告是否认罪或在审判中被判有罪存在差异。讨论了这些发现的意义。

相似文献

1
Differences in legal outcomes for male and female children who have been sexually abused.遭受性虐待的男童和女童在法律结果上的差异。
Sex Abuse. 2010 Dec;22(4):427-42. doi: 10.1177/1079063210375973. Epub 2010 Oct 9.
2
Legal outcomes for children who have been sexually abused: the impact of child abuse assessment center evaluations.遭受性虐待儿童的法律后果:儿童虐待评估中心评估的影响。
Child Maltreat. 2004 Aug;9(3):263-76. doi: 10.1177/1077559504267004.
3
Why have all the boys gone? Gender differences in prosecution acceptance of child sexual abuse cases.为什么所有的男孩都不见了?儿童性虐待案件起诉受理中的性别差异。
Sex Abuse. 2013 Oct;25(5):461-81. doi: 10.1177/1079063212465900. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
4
Sexual offences against children: an exploration of attrition in the Northern Ireland criminal justice system.针对儿童的性犯罪:对北爱尔兰刑事司法系统中诉讼程序中止情况的探究。
Child Abuse Negl. 2008 Dec;32(12):1109-18. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.09.002. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
5
Juror perceptions of child eyewitness testimony in a sexual abuse trial.陪审员对性虐待审判中儿童目击证人证词的看法。
J Child Sex Abus. 2007;16(2):79-95. doi: 10.1300/J070v16n02_05.
6
Sexual abuse history among adult sex offenders and non-sex offenders: a meta-analysis.成年性犯罪者和非性犯罪者的性虐待史:一项荟萃分析。
Child Abuse Negl. 2009 Mar;33(3):179-92. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.07.004. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
7
Legal outcomes of sexually abused children evaluated at the Philippine General Hospital Child Protection Unit.在菲律宾总医院儿童保护科接受评估的性虐待儿童的法律结果。
Child Abuse Negl. 2009 Mar;33(3):193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.09.004. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
8
How long to prosecute child sexual abuse for a community using a Children's Advocacy Center and two comparison communities?对于一个使用儿童权益保护中心的社区以及两个对照社区,起诉儿童性虐待案件需要多长时间?
Child Maltreat. 2008 Feb;13(1):3-13. doi: 10.1177/1077559507307839.
9
Female sexual abuse and criminal justice intervention: a comparison of child protective service and criminal justice samples.女性性虐待与刑事司法干预:儿童保护服务与刑事司法样本的比较
Child Abuse Negl. 2008 Jan;32(1):111-9. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.04.014.
10
[Analysis of clinical forensic examination reports on sexually abused children].[受性虐待儿童的临床法医检查报告分析]
Arch Kriminol. 2010 Jan-Feb;225(1-2):18-27.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Sexual Assault Case Attrition in the United States from 2000 to 2020.2000年至2020年美国性侵犯案件诉讼终止情况的系统评价。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Nov 16:15248380241293803. doi: 10.1177/15248380241293803.