• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于一个使用儿童权益保护中心的社区以及两个对照社区,起诉儿童性虐待案件需要多长时间?

How long to prosecute child sexual abuse for a community using a Children's Advocacy Center and two comparison communities?

作者信息

Walsh Wendy A, Lippert Tonya, Cross Theodore P, Maurice Danielle M, Davison Karen S

机构信息

Crimes against Children Research Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA.

出版信息

Child Maltreat. 2008 Feb;13(1):3-13. doi: 10.1177/1077559507307839.

DOI:10.1177/1077559507307839
PMID:18174344
Abstract

This article explores the length of time between key events in the criminal prosecution of child sexual abuse cases (charging decision, case resolution process, and total case-processing time), which previous research suggests is related to victims' recovery. The sample included 160 cases in three communities served by the Dallas County District Attorney. Most cases (69%) took at least 60 days for the charging decision, with cases investigated at the Children's Advocacy Center having a quicker time than either comparison community. Only 20% of cases had a case resolution time within the 180-day target suggested by the American Bar Association standard for felonies. Controlling for case characteristics, one of the three communities and cases with an initial arrest had a significantly quicker case resolution time. Total case processing generally took more than 2 years. Implications include the need to better monitor and shorten case resolution time.

摘要

本文探讨了儿童性虐待案件刑事诉讼中关键事件之间的时间长度(指控决定、案件解决过程和案件总处理时间),先前的研究表明这与受害者的康复有关。样本包括达拉斯县地方检察官服务的三个社区的160起案件。大多数案件(69%)做出指控决定至少需要60天,在儿童权益中心进行调查的案件比其他两个对比社区的案件处理时间更快。只有20%的案件在重罪的美国律师协会标准建议的180天目标内完成案件解决。在控制案件特征后,三个社区之一以及最初被捕的案件的案件解决时间明显更快。案件总处理时间一般超过两年。这意味着需要更好地监测和缩短案件解决时间。

相似文献

1
How long to prosecute child sexual abuse for a community using a Children's Advocacy Center and two comparison communities?对于一个使用儿童权益保护中心的社区以及两个对照社区,起诉儿童性虐待案件需要多长时间?
Child Maltreat. 2008 Feb;13(1):3-13. doi: 10.1177/1077559507307839.
2
Sexual offences against children: an exploration of attrition in the Northern Ireland criminal justice system.针对儿童的性犯罪:对北爱尔兰刑事司法系统中诉讼程序中止情况的探究。
Child Abuse Negl. 2008 Dec;32(12):1109-18. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.09.002. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
3
Which sexual abuse victims receive a forensic medical examination? The impact of Children's Advocacy Centers.哪些性虐待受害者接受了法医检查?儿童权益保护中心的影响。
Child Abuse Negl. 2007 Oct;31(10):1053-68. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.04.006. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
4
The contribution of children's advocacy centers to felony prosecutions of child sexual abuse.儿童维权中心对儿童性虐待重罪起诉的贡献。
Child Abuse Negl. 2009 Jan;33(1):12-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.07.002. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
5
Legal decision-making in child sexual abuse investigations: A mixed-methods study of factors that influence prosecution.儿童性虐待调查中的法律决策:影响起诉因素的混合方法研究。
Child Abuse Negl. 2018 May;79:302-314. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.02.022. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
6
Do Children's Advocacy Centers improve families' experiences of child sexual abuse investigations?儿童权益保护中心能否改善家庭在儿童性虐待调查中的体验?
Child Abuse Negl. 2007 Oct;31(10):1069-85. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.07.003. Epub 2007 Nov 7.
7
Child forensic interviewing in Children's Advocacy Centers: empirical data on a practice model.儿童权益保护中心的儿童法医面谈:一种实践模式的实证数据。
Child Abuse Negl. 2007 Oct;31(10):1031-52. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.04.007. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
8
Using child advocacy center tracking data to examine criminal disposition times.利用儿童权益保护中心追踪数据来研究刑事处置时间。
J Child Sex Abus. 2014;23(2):198-216. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2014.868386.
9
Why have all the boys gone? Gender differences in prosecution acceptance of child sexual abuse cases.为什么所有的男孩都不见了?儿童性虐待案件起诉受理中的性别差异。
Sex Abuse. 2013 Oct;25(5):461-81. doi: 10.1177/1079063212465900. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
10
Differences in legal outcomes for male and female children who have been sexually abused.遭受性虐待的男童和女童在法律结果上的差异。
Sex Abuse. 2010 Dec;22(4):427-42. doi: 10.1177/1079063210375973. Epub 2010 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Sexual Assault Case Attrition in the United States from 2000 to 2020.2000年至2020年美国性侵犯案件诉讼终止情况的系统评价。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Nov 16:15248380241293803. doi: 10.1177/15248380241293803.
2
Are one-stop centres an appropriate model to deliver services to sexually abused children in urban Malawi?一站式中心是否适合为马拉维城市中遭受性虐待的儿童提供服务?
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Apr 30;18(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1121-z.
3
Child and youth advocacy centres: A change in practice that can change a lifetime.
儿童与青少年维权中心:一种能改变一生的实践变革。
Paediatr Child Health. 2018 Apr;23(2):116-118. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxy008. Epub 2018 Mar 1.