• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么所有的男孩都不见了?儿童性虐待案件起诉受理中的性别差异。

Why have all the boys gone? Gender differences in prosecution acceptance of child sexual abuse cases.

机构信息

Department of Psychology,, Willamette University, Salem, OR 97301, USA.

出版信息

Sex Abuse. 2013 Oct;25(5):461-81. doi: 10.1177/1079063212465900. Epub 2012 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1177/1079063212465900
PMID:23192527
Abstract

Cases of child sexual abuse (CSA) referred to the District Attorney (DA) are not necessarily accepted for prosecution. Two pilot studies sought to investigate whether there were gender differences in whether cases of CSA referred to the DA's office were accepted by the DA and, if they existed, what might account for gender differences in decisions to accept cases and file charges. The results of the first study indicated that cases involving male victims were significantly less likely to be accepted for prosecution than cases involving female victims. Comparisons of acceptance rates were based on expected frequencies given CSA prevalence rates by gender in the literature and on the proportion of males and females seen at a Child Abuse Assessment Center (CAAC) from where the DA referrals were obtained. The second study assessed both disclosure-related variables (assessed by content analyses of disclosures made at a CAAC) and abuse-related variables (that occurred at or near the time of the abuse) that might explain these differences. Few variables were found to significantly differentiate males' and females' cases; these were the relationship of the child to the perpetrator, whether the child was offended by a juvenile, whether the child told someone of the abuse, pornography exposure, whether the child displayed concerning behaviors, and whether the child was questioned about possible abuse. Implications of these results are discussed.

摘要

儿童性虐待(CSA)案件提交地区检察官(DA)并不一定被接受起诉。两项试点研究旨在调查 CSA 案件提交 DA 办公室是否存在性别差异,以及如果存在差异,哪些因素可能导致对案件的接受和指控决定存在性别差异。第一项研究的结果表明,涉及男性受害者的案件被接受起诉的可能性明显低于涉及女性受害者的案件。接受率的比较是基于文献中按性别划分的 CSA 流行率以及从 DA 转介来源的儿童虐待评估中心(CAAC)看到的男性和女性的比例得出的预期频率。第二项研究评估了可能解释这些差异的与披露相关的变量(通过对 CAAC 进行的披露进行内容分析评估)和与虐待相关的变量(发生在虐待时或附近)。很少有变量被发现能够显著区分男性和女性的案件;这些变量是儿童与施虐者的关系、儿童是否被未成年人冒犯、儿童是否告诉过别人虐待、色情暴露、儿童是否表现出令人担忧的行为以及儿童是否被询问过可能的虐待。讨论了这些结果的含义。

相似文献

1
Why have all the boys gone? Gender differences in prosecution acceptance of child sexual abuse cases.为什么所有的男孩都不见了?儿童性虐待案件起诉受理中的性别差异。
Sex Abuse. 2013 Oct;25(5):461-81. doi: 10.1177/1079063212465900. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
2
Differences in legal outcomes for male and female children who have been sexually abused.遭受性虐待的男童和女童在法律结果上的差异。
Sex Abuse. 2010 Dec;22(4):427-42. doi: 10.1177/1079063210375973. Epub 2010 Oct 9.
3
Prosecution of child abuse: a meta-analysis of rates of criminal justice decisions.虐待儿童的起诉:刑事司法判决率的荟萃分析。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2003 Oct;4(4):323-40. doi: 10.1177/1524838003256561.
4
Effectiveness of Child Advocacy Centers and the multidisciplinary team approach on prosecution rates of alleged sex offenders and satisfaction of non-offending caregivers with allegations of child sexual abuse: a systematic review.儿童权益保护中心及多学科团队方法对被指控性犯罪者的起诉率和未犯罪照料者对儿童性虐待指控满意度的有效性:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Jan 15;13(12):93-129. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2113.
5
Sexual offences against children: an exploration of attrition in the Northern Ireland criminal justice system.针对儿童的性犯罪:对北爱尔兰刑事司法系统中诉讼程序中止情况的探究。
Child Abuse Negl. 2008 Dec;32(12):1109-18. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.09.002. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
6
Legal outcomes for children who have been sexually abused: the impact of child abuse assessment center evaluations.遭受性虐待儿童的法律后果:儿童虐待评估中心评估的影响。
Child Maltreat. 2004 Aug;9(3):263-76. doi: 10.1177/1077559504267004.
7
How long to prosecute child sexual abuse for a community using a Children's Advocacy Center and two comparison communities?对于一个使用儿童权益保护中心的社区以及两个对照社区,起诉儿童性虐待案件需要多长时间?
Child Maltreat. 2008 Feb;13(1):3-13. doi: 10.1177/1077559507307839.
8
Legal decision-making in child sexual abuse investigations: A mixed-methods study of factors that influence prosecution.儿童性虐待调查中的法律决策:影响起诉因素的混合方法研究。
Child Abuse Negl. 2018 May;79:302-314. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.02.022. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
9
Using child advocacy center tracking data to examine criminal disposition times.利用儿童权益保护中心追踪数据来研究刑事处置时间。
J Child Sex Abus. 2014;23(2):198-216. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2014.868386.
10
Female sexual abuse and criminal justice intervention: a comparison of child protective service and criminal justice samples.女性性虐待与刑事司法干预:儿童保护服务与刑事司法样本的比较
Child Abuse Negl. 2008 Jan;32(1):111-9. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.04.014.