Program in Nursing Science, College of Health Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3959, USA.
J Immigr Minor Health. 2011 Oct;13(5):803-8. doi: 10.1007/s10903-010-9397-6.
Asian subgroup-specific information on type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is scarce. Using the California Health Interview Survey 2007 data, we examined Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Filipinos, and Vietnamese adults (n = 3,688) and Caucasian adults (n = 33,981) for the prevalence of DM and risk factors. The age-adjusted prevalence of DM was the highest among Filipinos (8.05%) followed by Japanese (7.07%), Vietnamese (7.03%), and Koreans (6.3%). Chinese (5.93%) was the only Asian group studied whose prevalence was lower than Caucasians (5.94%). From multiple logistic regression, after adjusting for risk factors, Japanese had the highest likelihood of DM (OR = 1.75, CI = [1.12-2.73], P < 0.05), followed by Filipinos (1.66, [1.13-2.43], P < 0.01), and Koreans (1.59, [1.00-2.52], P < 0.05), relative to Caucasians. Our results suggest that even after accounting for lifestyle and other risk factor differences between Caucasians and key Asian subgroups in California, Japanese, Filipinos, and Koreans have a 1.6-1.75 greater likelihood of DM compared to Caucasians.
亚洲亚群特有的 2 型糖尿病(DM)信息较少。我们利用 2007 年加利福尼亚健康访谈调查的数据,研究了华裔、韩裔、日裔、菲律宾裔和越南裔成年人(n=3688)和白种成年人(n=33981)的 DM 患病率和危险因素。调整年龄后的 DM 患病率在菲律宾裔中最高(8.05%),其次是日裔(7.07%)、越南裔(7.03%)和韩裔(6.3%)。华裔(5.93%)是唯一研究的亚洲群体,其患病率低于白种人(5.94%)。在多因素逻辑回归分析中,调整危险因素后,日本人患 DM 的可能性最高(OR=1.75,CI=[1.12-2.73],P<0.05),其次是菲律宾人(1.66,[1.13-2.43],P<0.01)和韩国人(1.59,[1.00-2.52],P<0.05),与白种人相比。我们的结果表明,即使在加利福尼亚州白种人和主要亚洲亚群之间的生活方式和其他危险因素差异得到考虑的情况下,日本人、菲律宾人和韩国人患 DM 的可能性比白种人高 1.6-1.75 倍。