Suppr超能文献

联邦机构的比较疗效研究重点:来自退伍军人事务部、国家老龄化研究所和医疗保健研究与质量局的观点。

Comparative effectiveness research priorities at federal agencies: the view from the Department of Veterans Affairs, National Institute on Aging, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

机构信息

Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Research and Development, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Jun;58(6):1187-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02939.x.

Abstract

In the last year, attention has been focused on translating federally sponsored health research into better health for Americans. Since the passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) on February 17, 2009, ARRA funds to support Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) have increased this focus. A large proportion of topical areas of interest in CER affects the older segment of the population. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), the National Institute on Aging (NIA), and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) have supported robust research portfolios focused on aging populations that meet the varying definitions of CER. This short article briefly describes the research missions of the AHRQ, NIA, and VA. The various definitions of CER as the Congressional Budget Office, the Institute of Medicine, and the ARRA-established Federal Coordinating Council have put forward, as well as important topics for which CER is particularly needed, are then reviewed. Finally, approaches in which the three agencies support CER involving the aging population are set forth and opportunities for future CER research outlined.

摘要

在过去的一年中,人们一直关注将联邦资助的健康研究转化为美国人更好的健康。自 2009 年 2 月 17 日美国复苏与再投资法案(ARRA)通过以来,支持比较效果研究(CER)的 ARRA 资金增加了这一重点。CER 中大量受到关注的专题领域都影响到人口中的老年群体。美国退伍军人事务部(VA)、国家老龄化研究所(NIA)和医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)支持了针对老年人口的强大研究组合,这些研究符合 CER 的不同定义。这篇短文简要描述了 AHRQ、NIA 和 VA 的研究任务。然后,回顾了国会预算办公室、医学研究所和 ARRA 设立的联邦协调理事会提出的 CER 的各种定义,以及特别需要 CER 的重要主题。最后,阐述了这三个机构支持涉及老年人口的 CER 的方法,并概述了未来 CER 研究的机会。

相似文献

7
Comparative effectiveness research: a progress report.比较疗效研究:进展报告。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Oct 5;153(7):469-72. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-7-201010050-00269. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
10
The politics of comparative effectiveness research: lessons from recent history.比较效果研究的政治学:近代历史的教训
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2014 Feb;39(1):139-70. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2395199. Epub 2013 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of LittleEARS questionnaire in Hindi language.用印地语对LittleEARS问卷进行验证。
J Otol. 2023 Apr;18(2):71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2022.12.003. Epub 2022 Dec 28.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验