• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动物类别的语义组织:来自语义言语流畅性和网络理论的证据。

The semantic organization of the animal category: evidence from semantic verbal fluency and network theory.

作者信息

Goñi Joaquín, Arrondo Gonzalo, Sepulcre Jorge, Martincorena Iñigo, Vélez de Mendizábal Nieves, Corominas-Murtra Bernat, Bejarano Bartolomé, Ardanza-Trevijano Sergio, Peraita Herminia, Wall Dennis P, Villoslada Pablo

机构信息

Department of Neurosciences. Center for Applied Medical Research, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

出版信息

Cogn Process. 2011 May;12(2):183-96. doi: 10.1007/s10339-010-0372-x. Epub 2010 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1007/s10339-010-0372-x
PMID:20938799
Abstract

Semantic memory is the subsystem of human memory that stores knowledge of concepts or meanings, as opposed to life-specific experiences. How humans organize semantic information remains poorly understood. In an effort to better understand this issue, we conducted a verbal fluency experiment on 200 participants with the aim of inferring and representing the conceptual storage structure of the natural category of animals as a network. This was done by formulating a statistical framework for co-occurring concepts that aims to infer significant concept-concept associations and represent them as a graph. The resulting network was analyzed and enriched by means of a missing links recovery criterion based on modularity. Both network models were compared to a thresholded co-occurrence approach. They were evaluated using a random subset of verbal fluency tests and comparing the network outcomes (linked pairs are clustering transitions and disconnected pairs are switching transitions) to the outcomes of two expert human raters. Results show that the network models proposed in this study overcome a thresholded co-occurrence approach, and their outcomes are in high agreement with human evaluations. Finally, the interplay between conceptual structure and retrieval mechanisms is discussed.

摘要

语义记忆是人类记忆的子系统,用于存储概念或意义的知识,与特定生活经历相对。人类如何组织语义信息仍知之甚少。为了更好地理解这个问题,我们对200名参与者进行了一项语言流畅性实验,目的是推断并将动物自然类别的概念存储结构表示为一个网络。这是通过为共现概念制定一个统计框架来完成的,该框架旨在推断重要的概念-概念关联并将它们表示为一个图。通过基于模块性的缺失链接恢复标准对得到的网络进行分析和充实。将这两个网络模型与一种阈值共现方法进行比较。使用语言流畅性测试的一个随机子集对它们进行评估,并将网络结果(相连对是聚类转换,不相连对是切换转换)与两位专家人类评分者的结果进行比较。结果表明,本研究中提出的网络模型克服了阈值共现方法,并且它们的结果与人类评估高度一致。最后,讨论了概念结构与检索机制之间的相互作用。

相似文献

1
The semantic organization of the animal category: evidence from semantic verbal fluency and network theory.动物类别的语义组织:来自语义言语流畅性和网络理论的证据。
Cogn Process. 2011 May;12(2):183-96. doi: 10.1007/s10339-010-0372-x. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
2
Language networks associated with computerized semantic indices.与计算机语义索引相关的语言网络。
Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 1;104:125-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
3
Performance on a semantic verbal fluency task across time: dissociation between clustering, switching, and categorical exploitation processes.语义流畅性任务在时间上的表现:聚类、转换和类别利用过程的分离。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010 Mar;32(3):268-80. doi: 10.1080/13803390902984464. Epub 2009 Aug 5.
4
Semantic relevance and semantic disorders.语义相关性和语义障碍。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Apr;16(3):439-52. doi: 10.1162/089892904322926773.
5
SNAFU: The Semantic Network and Fluency Utility.SNAFU:语义网络和流畅性实用程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Aug;52(4):1681-1699. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01343-w.
6
Preserved semantic categorical organization in mild cognitive impairment: A network analysis of verbal fluency.轻度认知障碍中语义范畴组织的保持:词汇流畅性的网络分析。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Jul 16;157:107875. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107875. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
7
Semantic memory organization during the early stage of recovery from traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤恢复早期的语义记忆组织
Brain Inj. 2008 Mar;22(3):243-53. doi: 10.1080/02699050801935252.
8
Verbal fluency in Huntington's disease: a longitudinal analysis of phonemic and semantic clustering and switching.亨廷顿舞蹈症中的语言流畅性:音素和语义聚类及转换的纵向分析
Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(8):1277-84. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00217-2.
9
Both processing speed and semantic memory organization predict verbal fluency in schizophrenia.处理速度和语义记忆组织均能预测精神分裂症患者的言语流畅性。
Schizophr Res. 2003 Feb 1;59(2-3):269-75. doi: 10.1016/s0920-9964(02)00200-1.
10
Associations between memory and verbal fluency tasks.记忆与言语流畅性任务之间的关联。
J Commun Disord. 2020 Jan-Feb;83:105968. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.105968. Epub 2019 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Semantic memory disorganization linked to social functioning in patients with schizophrenia.语义记忆紊乱与精神分裂症患者的社会功能相关。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Apr 15;11(1):61. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00615-z.
2
Sex differences in problematic pornography use among adolescents: a network analysis.青少年问题性色情内容使用中的性别差异:一项网络分析
BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 8;13(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02624-0.
3
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with retrieval practice on semantic memory in patients with schizophrenia.

本文引用的文献

1
Analyzing the dynamics of free recall: An integrative review of the empirical literature.分析自由回忆的动态:实证文献的综合评述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Mar;1(1):89-106. doi: 10.3758/BF03200763.
2
An assessment of the semantic network in patients with Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病患者语义网络评估。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1993 Spring;5(2):254-61. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.2.254.
3
The large-scale structure of semantic networks: statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth.语义网络的大规模结构:统计分析和语义增长模型。
经颅直流电刺激联合提取练习对精神分裂症患者语义记忆的影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 7;25(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06530-y.
4
Leveraging relatedness-based measures in people with language disorders: A scoping review.在语言障碍患者中利用基于关联性的测量方法:一项范围综述。
J Neuropsychol. 2025 Jun;19(2):299-337. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12405. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
5
Post-Processing Automatic Transcriptions with Machine Learning for Verbal Fluency Scoring.使用机器学习对自动转录进行后处理以进行言语流畅性评分
Speech Commun. 2023 Nov;155. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2023.102990. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
6
Navigating the Mental Lexicon: Network Structures, Lexical Search and Lexical Retrieval.心理词汇的探索:网络结构、词汇搜索和词汇检索。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2024 Mar 1;53(2):21. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10059-8.
7
Cognitive networks detect structural patterns and emotional complexity in suicide notes.认知网络可检测自杀遗书的结构模式和情感复杂性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 8;13:917630. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.917630. eCollection 2022.
8
Structural differences in the semantic networks of younger and older adults.年轻人和老年人语义网络的结构差异。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 12;12(1):21459. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11698-4.
9
A comparison of techniques for deriving clustering and switching scores from verbal fluency word lists.从言语流畅性单词列表中得出聚类和转换分数的技术比较。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 14;13:743557. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.743557. eCollection 2022.
10
An investigation of the cognitive and neural correlates of semantic memory search related to creative ability.对与创造力相关的语义记忆搜索的认知和神经相关性的调查。
Commun Biol. 2022 Jun 16;5(1):604. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03547-x.
Cogn Sci. 2005 Jan 2;29(1):41-78. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2901_3.
4
Missing and spurious interactions and the reconstruction of complex networks.缺失和虚假交互以及复杂网络的重构。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 29;106(52):22073-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908366106. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
5
Category-specific neural processing for naming pictures of animals and naming pictures of tools: an ALE meta-analysis.针对命名动物图片和命名工具图片的类别特异性神经加工:一项基于激活似然估计的荟萃分析。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(2):409-18. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.032. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
6
Network graph analysis of category fluency testing.类别流畅性测试的网络图分析
Cogn Behav Neurol. 2009 Mar;22(1):45-52. doi: 10.1097/WNN.0b013e318192ccaf.
7
Data completeness--the Achilles heel of drug-target networks.数据完整性——药物-靶点网络的致命弱点。
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Sep;26(9):983-4. doi: 10.1038/nbt0908-983.
8
Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks.网络中的层次结构与缺失链接预测
Nature. 2008 May 1;453(7191):98-101. doi: 10.1038/nature06830.
9
Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure.复杂网络上随机游走的图谱揭示了群落结构。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 29;105(4):1118-23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706851105. Epub 2008 Jan 23.
10
Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain.你从何处知晓你所知道的?语义知识在人脑中的表征。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Dec;8(12):976-87. doi: 10.1038/nrn2277.