TMD Clinic Section of Maxillofacial Surgery School of Dentistry, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
J Oral Rehabil. 2011 May;38(5):315-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02164.x. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
This study attempted to identify baseline predictors of positive outcome of arthrocenteses plus hyaluronic acid injections in degenerative temporomandibular joint disease (TMJ DJD). Ninety (n=90) consecutive patients with Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders TMJ osteoarthritis (RDC/TMD 1.0 Axis I Group IIIb) underwent a cycle of five arthrocenteses with injections of 1mL hyaluronic acid and were followed up for 3months. Eight potential predictors of positive treatment outcome (sex, age, pain duration, baseline pain at chewing, presence of uni- or bilateral arthritis, presence of other concurrent RDC/TMD diagnoses, type of intervention and tolerability of treatment) were included in a logistic regression model to identify baseline predictors of treatment effectiveness. At follow-up, 85·6% of patients improved with respect to baseline VAS values, and 64·4% had a 50% or more decrease (positive outcomes). Correlation with positive outcomes existed only for unilateral osteoarthritis, and the logistic regression identified the side of arthritis (unilateral/bilateral) as the only predictor of positive treatment outcome (P=0·032). The achievement of any treatment improvement was predicted by high baseline pain levels (P=0·016). The regression models explained only 7·7-15% of the variance in the outcome variable. The attempts to find predictors of positive treatment outcome with HA injections for TMJ degenerative joint disease have been successful only in part. The search for other outcome predictors is likely to benefit from the assessment of psychosocial features associated with TMJ disorders.
本研究旨在确定关节内注射透明质酸治疗退行性颞下颌关节疾病(TMJ DJD)的阳性结果的基线预测因素。90 例连续的符合颞下颌关节紊乱研究诊断标准(RDC/TMD 1.0 轴 I 组 IIIb)的 TMJ 骨关节炎患者接受了 5 次关节内注射 1mL 透明质酸的治疗,并在 3 个月后进行了随访。8 个潜在的治疗效果阳性预测因素(性别、年龄、疼痛持续时间、基线咀嚼时疼痛、单侧或双侧关节炎、其他同时存在的 RDC/TMD 诊断、干预类型和治疗耐受性)被纳入逻辑回归模型,以确定治疗效果的基线预测因素。随访时,85.6%的患者在 VAS 基线值方面有所改善,64.4%的患者疼痛减轻了 50%或更多(阳性结果)。与阳性结果相关的只有单侧关节炎,逻辑回归确定关节炎的侧别(单侧/双侧)是治疗阳性结果的唯一预测因素(P=0.032)。任何治疗改善的实现都与高基线疼痛水平相关(P=0.016)。回归模型仅解释了结果变量的 7.7-15%的变异性。尝试寻找透明质酸注射治疗 TMJ 退行性关节疾病的阳性治疗结果的预测因素仅部分成功。寻找其他结果预测因素可能受益于评估与 TMJ 紊乱相关的社会心理特征。