Suppr超能文献

跨境生殖保健中的多元化问题。

The pluralism problem in cross-border reproductive care.

机构信息

School of Law, City University of New York, Flushing, NY, USA.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2010 Dec;25(12):2939-43. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq270. Epub 2010 Oct 12.

Abstract

Outlawing well established forms of assisted reproduction places obstacles in the path of couples who wish to attain their reproductive goals with medical assistance. One effect of restrictive reproductive laws that has received widespread attention is cross-border reproductive travel. In Europe, such travel is permitted by the policy of free movement of persons that is a cornerstone of the democratic and economic stability of the European Union. Cross-border reproductive travel fails to promote moral and political pluralism in democratic states for three primary reasons. First, the opportunity for patients to go abroad for treatment tempers organized resistance to the law and allows government to pass stricter regulations than it otherwise might. Second, cross-border reproductive care has been shown to have deleterious extraterritorial effects that undermine the articulated rationales behind restrictive reproductive laws. Third, laws that generate demand for cross-border reproductive care often fail to satisfy the standard of proportionality that restrictions on human reproduction must meet.

摘要

将已确立的辅助生殖形式合法化会阻碍那些希望通过医疗援助实现生殖目标的夫妇。限制生殖的法律的一个广泛受到关注的影响是跨境生殖旅行。在欧洲,这种旅行是由人员自由流动政策所允许的,这是欧盟民主和经济稳定的基石。跨境生殖旅行未能促进民主国家的道德和政治多元化,主要有三个原因。首先,患者有机会出国接受治疗,这削弱了对法律的有组织抵制,并使政府能够通过比原本更严格的规定。其次,跨境生殖护理已被证明具有有害的治外法权影响,破坏了限制生殖法律背后的明确理由。第三,产生跨境生殖护理需求的法律往往不符合对人类生殖进行限制必须满足的相称性标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验