Suppr超能文献

宫颈癌分子筛查工具的评估;人乳头瘤病毒DNA检测与E6/E7信使核糖核酸检测;伊朗女性前瞻性队列研究的首次报告

Assessment of Cervical Cancer Molecular-Based Screening Tools; HPV-DNA Detection versus E6/E7 mRNA Testing; First Report of a Prospective Cohort Study among Iranian Women.

作者信息

Mousavi Azam-Sadat, Pouryasin Ali, Yarandi Fariba, Pirzadeh Leila, Alipour Abbas, Khodadad Shakiba, Pouryasin Mohammad

机构信息

Department of Gynecology-Oncology, Vali-e-Asr Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

National Association of Iranian Gynecologists and Obstetricians, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Iran J Public Health. 2020 Sep;49(9):1734-1742. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v49i9.4093.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV) has been found as the most considerable causes of cervical cancer. Recently, several molecular methods have been introduced to increase the accuracy of the screening programs and decrease the mortality rate. Among these methods, mRNA-based methods have more advantages as they assess the expression level of HPV E6 and E7 oncogenic mRNAs. This study aimed to evaluate the results of HPV RNA- and DNA-based methods among Iranian women population with normal cytology results.

METHODS

Overall, 4640 women were enrolled referred to the Gynecology Oncology Ward of Vali-e-Asr Hospital, private and academic clinics, Tehran, Iran from Jan 2016 to Apr 2018. To assess the HPV-DNA infection INNO-LiPA® HPV Genotyping Extra-II kit was used. For HPV-RNA assessment, Aptima HPV Assay and in house HPV-RNA genotyping methods were applied.

RESULTS

The positivity rates of HPV infection according to DNA- and RNA-based methods were 18.0% and 11.2%, respectively (<0.001). The positive predictive value, negative predictive value, specificity and sensitivity of DNA-based method in contrast with RNA-based method were 59.2% (56.6-61.6), 99.4% (99.0-99.6), 91.7% (90.8-92.6) and 95.2% (93.0-96.9) respectively.

CONCLUSION

At the present study for prognosis of cervical cancer, RNA-based method seemed to be more specific in contrast to DNA-based method. Patient follow up and further studies will be conducted in order to clarify the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the two methods.

摘要

背景

人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)已被发现是宫颈癌最主要的病因。近来,已引入多种分子方法以提高筛查项目的准确性并降低死亡率。在这些方法中,基于mRNA的方法具有更多优势,因为它们可评估HPV E6和E7致癌mRNA的表达水平。本研究旨在评估细胞学结果正常的伊朗女性人群中基于HPV RNA和DNA方法的检测结果。

方法

2016年1月至2018年4月期间,共有4640名女性被纳入研究,她们来自伊朗德黑兰瓦利阿斯尔医院的妇科肿瘤病房、私立诊所和学术诊所。为评估HPV-DNA感染,使用了INNO-LiPA® HPV基因分型Extra-II试剂盒。对于HPV-RNA评估,应用了Aptima HPV检测法和内部HPV-RNA基因分型方法。

结果

基于DNA和RNA方法的HPV感染阳性率分别为18.0%和11.2%(<0.001)。与基于RNA的方法相比,基于DNA的方法的阳性预测值、阴性预测值、特异性和敏感性分别为59.2%(56.6-61.6)、99.4%(99.0-99.6)、91.7%(90.8-92.6)和95.2%(93.0-96.9)。

结论

在本研究中,对于宫颈癌的预后,基于RNA的方法似乎比基于DNA的方法更具特异性。将进行患者随访和进一步研究以阐明这两种方法的临床敏感性和特异性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
A review of the clinical performance of the Aptima HPV assay.Aptima人乳头瘤病毒检测的临床性能综述。
J Clin Virol. 2016 Mar;76 Suppl 1:S40-S48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.10.027. Epub 2015 Nov 6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验