Suppr超能文献

多分析物方法中共同洗脱分析物的离子抑制和增强效应:使用大气压化学电离或电喷雾电离的超高效液相色谱/质谱进行系统研究。

Ion suppression and enhancement effects of co-eluting analytes in multi-analyte approaches: systematic investigation using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry with atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization or electrospray ionization.

机构信息

Department of Experimental and Clinical Toxicology, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Saarland University, D-66421 Homburg (Saar), Germany.

出版信息

Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2010 Nov 15;24(21):3103-8. doi: 10.1002/rcm.4736.

Abstract

In multi-analyte procedures, sufficient separation is important to avoid interferences, particularly when using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) because of possible ion suppression or enhancement. However, even using ultra-high-performance LC, baseline separation is not always possible. For development and validation of an LC/MS/MS approach for quantification of 140 antidepressants, benzodiazepines, neuroleptics, beta-blockers, oral antidiabetics, and analytes measured in the context of brain death diagnosis in plasma, the extent of ion suppression or enhancement of co-eluting analytes within and between the drug classes was investigated using atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization (APCI) or electrospray ionization (ESI). Within the drug classes, five analytes showed ion enhancement of over 25% and six analytes ion suppression of over 25% using APCI and 16 analytes ion suppression of over 25% using ESI. Between the drug classes, two analytes showed ion suppression of over 25% using APCI. Using ESI, one analyte showed ion enhancement of over 25% and five analytes ion suppression of over 25%. These effects may influence the drug quantification using calibrators made in presence of overlapping and thus interfering analytes. Ion suppression/enhancement effects induced by co-eluting drugs of different classes present in the patient sample may also lead to false measurements using class-specific calibrators made in absence of overlapping and thus interfering analytes. In conclusion, ion suppression and enhancement tests are essential during method development and validation in LC/MS/MS multi-analyte procedures, with special regards to co-eluting analytes.

摘要

在多分析物程序中,充分的分离对于避免干扰很重要,特别是在使用液相色谱/质谱(LC/MS)时,因为可能会存在离子抑制或增强。然而,即使使用超高效液相色谱,也不一定能实现基线分离。为了开发和验证一种用于定量测定血浆中 140 种抗抑郁药、苯二氮䓬类药物、神经安定药、β受体阻滞剂、口服抗糖尿病药和脑死亡诊断相关分析物的 LC/MS/MS 方法,使用大气压化学电离(APCI)或电喷雾电离(ESI)研究了共洗脱分析物在药物类别内和药物类别之间的离子抑制或增强程度。在药物类别内,五种分析物的离子增强超过 25%,六种分析物的离子抑制超过 25%,使用 APCI;16 种分析物的离子抑制超过 25%,使用 ESI。在药物类别之间,两种分析物的离子抑制超过 25%,使用 APCI。使用 ESI,一种分析物的离子增强超过 25%,五种分析物的离子抑制超过 25%。这些影响可能会影响使用在存在重叠且因此存在干扰分析物的情况下制备的校准器进行的药物定量。患者样本中不同类别共洗脱药物引起的离子抑制/增强效应也可能导致使用无重叠且因此无干扰分析物的特定类别校准器进行虚假测量。总之,在 LC/MS/MS 多分析物程序的方法开发和验证中,离子抑制和增强测试是必不可少的,特别是对于共洗脱分析物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验