Department of Experimental and Clinical Toxicology, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Saarland University, D-66421 Homburg (Saar), Germany.
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2010 Apr 15;24(7):859-67. doi: 10.1002/rcm.4459.
In clinical and forensic toxicology, multi-analyte procedures are very useful to quantify drugs and poisons of different classes in one run. For liquid chromatographic/tandem mass spectrometric (LC/MS/MS) multi-analyte procedures, often only a limited number of stable-isotope-labeled internal standards (SIL-ISs) are available. If an SIL-IS is used for quantification of other analytes, it must be excluded that the co-eluting native analyte influences its ionization. Therefore, the effect of ion suppression and enhancement of fourteen SIL-ISs caused by their native analogues has been studied. It could be shown that the native analyte concentration influenced the extent of ion suppression and enhancement effects leading to more suppression with increasing analyte concentration especially when electrospray ionization (ESI) was used. Using atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization (APCI), methanolic solution showed mainly enhancement effects, whereas no ion suppression and enhancement effect, with one exception, occurred when plasma extracts were used under these conditions. Such differences were not observed using ESI. With ESI, eleven SIL-ISs showed relevant suppression effects, but only one analyte showed suppression effects when APCI was used. The presented study showed that ion suppression and enhancement tests using matrix-based samples of different sources are essential for the selection of ISs, particularly if used for several analytes to avoid incorrect quantification. In conclusion, only SIL-ISs should be selected for which no suppression and enhancement effects can be observed. If not enough ISs are free of ionization interferences, a different ionization technique should be considered.
在临床和法医毒理学中,多分析物程序非常有用,可以在一次运行中定量测定不同类别的药物和毒物。对于液相色谱/串联质谱(LC/MS/MS)多分析物程序,通常只有有限数量的稳定同位素标记内标(SIL-IS)可用。如果使用 SIL-IS 来定量其他分析物,则必须排除共洗脱的天然分析物会影响其离子化。因此,研究了 14 种 SIL-IS 由其天然类似物引起的离子抑制和增强效应。结果表明,天然分析物浓度会影响离子抑制和增强效应的程度,导致随着分析物浓度的增加,抑制作用更明显,尤其是在使用电喷雾电离(ESI)时。使用大气压化学电离(APCI)时,甲醇溶液主要显示增强效应,而在这些条件下使用等离子体提取物时,除一个例外,没有观察到离子抑制和增强效应。使用 ESI 时未观察到这种差异。使用 ESI 时,11 种 SIL-IS 显示出相关的抑制效应,但当使用 APCI 时,只有一种分析物显示出抑制效应。本研究表明,使用不同来源的基于基质的样品进行离子抑制和增强测试对于 ISs 的选择至关重要,特别是如果用于多个分析物,以避免不正确的定量。总之,只有当没有观察到抑制和增强效应时,才应选择 SIL-IS。如果没有足够的 IS 不受离子化干扰,则应考虑使用不同的电离技术。