Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Fungal Biol. 2010 Apr;114(4):325-39. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
The phylogeny and taxonomy of Phytophthora cryptogea and Phytophthora drechsleri has long been a matter of controversy. To re-evaluate this, a worldwide collection of 117 isolates assigned to either P. cryptogea, P. drechsleri or their sister taxon, Phytophthora erythroseptica were assessed for morphological, physiological (pathological, cultural, temperature relations, mating) and molecular traits. Multiple gene phylogenetic analysis was performed on DNA sequences of nuclear (internal transcribed spacers (ITS), ß-tubulin, translation elongation factor 1α, elicitin) and mitochondrial (cytochrome c oxidase subunit I) genes. Congruence was observed between the different phylogenetic data sets and established that P. drechsleri and P. cryptogea are distinct species. Isolates of P. drechsleri form a monophyletic grouping with low levels of intraspecific diversity whereas P. cryptogea is more variable. Three distinct phylogenetic groups were noted within P. cryptogea with an intermediate group providing strong evidence for introgression of previously isolated lineages. This evidence suggests that P. cryptogea is an operational taxonomic unit and should remain a single species. Of all the morphological and physiological traits only growth rate at higher temperatures reliably discriminated isolates of P. drechsleri and P. cryptogea. As a homothallic taxon, P. erythroseptica, considered the cause of potato pink rot, is clearly different in mating behaviour from the other two species. Pathogenicity, however, was not a reliable characteristic as all isolates of the three species formed pink rot in potato tubers. The phylogenetic evidence suggests P. erythroseptica has evolved from P. cryptogea more recently than the split from the most recent common ancestor of all three species. However, more data and more isolates of authentic P. erythroseptica are needed to fully evaluate the taxonomic position of this species.
长期以来,腐霉属 cryptogea 和腐霉属 drechsleri 的系统发育和分类一直存在争议。为了重新评估这一点,对来自世界各地的 117 个分离物进行了评估,这些分离物被分配给腐霉属 cryptogea、腐霉属 drechsleri 或它们的姊妹分类群,即腐霉属 erythroseptica,评估其形态学、生理学(病理学、文化、温度关系、交配)和分子特征。对核(内部转录间隔区(ITS)、β-微管蛋白、翻译延伸因子 1α、激发素)和线粒体(细胞色素 c 氧化酶亚基 I)基因的 DNA 序列进行了多基因系统发育分析。不同的系统发育数据集之间存在一致性,并确定腐霉属 drechsleri 和腐霉属 cryptogea 是不同的种。腐霉属 drechsleri 的分离物形成一个单系群体,种内多样性水平较低,而腐霉属 cryptogea 的变异性更大。在腐霉属 cryptogea 中注意到三个不同的系统发育群,中间群为先前分离的谱系的基因渗入提供了强有力的证据。这一证据表明,腐霉属 cryptogea 是一个操作分类单元,应该仍然是一个单一的物种。在所有的形态学和生理学特征中,只有在较高温度下的生长速度可靠地区分了腐霉属 drechsleri 和腐霉属 cryptogea 的分离物。作为一个同宗交配的分类群,腐霉属 erythroseptica,被认为是马铃薯粉红腐烂的原因,在交配行为上与其他两个物种明显不同。然而,致病性不是一个可靠的特征,因为三个物种的所有分离物都在马铃薯块茎中形成粉红腐烂。系统发育证据表明,腐霉属 erythroseptica 是从腐霉属 cryptogea 进化而来的,比三个物种最近共同祖先的分裂时间更近。然而,需要更多的数据和更多的真正腐霉属 erythroseptica 分离物来全面评估该物种的分类地位。