York University, Toronto, Canada.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2000 Jul 1;17(5):415-36. doi: 10.1080/026432900410775.
We tested an architect with a lesion to the right prefrontal cortex in a real-world architectural design/planning task that required him to develop a new design for our lab space and compared his performance to an age- and education-matched architect. The patient understood the task and even observed that "this is a very simple problem." His sophisticated architectural knowledge base was still intact and he used it quite skilfully during the problem structuring phase. However, the patient's problem-solving behaviour differed from the control's behaviour in the following ways: (1) he was unable to make the transition from problem structuring to problem solving; (2) as a result preliminary design did not start until two thirds of the way into the session; (3) the preliminary design phase was minimal and erratic, consisting of three independently generated fragments; (4) there was no progression or lateral development of these fragments; (5) there was no carry-over of abstract information into the preliminary design or later phases, and (6) the patient did not make it to the detailing phase. This suggests that the key to understanding our patient's deficit is to understand the cognitive processes and mechanisms involved in the preliminary design phase. We appeal to a theory of design problem solving (Goel, 1995) that associates cognitive processes involved in preliminary design with "lateral" state transformations and argues that "ill-structured" representational and computational systems are necessary to support these transformations. We conclude that the neural basis of this system is selectively damaged in our patient.
我们在一项真实世界的建筑设计/规划任务中测试了一位右侧前额叶皮质受损的建筑师,要求他为我们的实验室空间设计一个新方案,并将他的表现与一位年龄和教育程度相匹配的建筑师进行比较。患者理解了任务,甚至观察到“这是一个非常简单的问题”。他复杂的建筑知识库仍然完好无损,在问题结构阶段他非常熟练地使用了它。然而,患者的解决问题的行为与对照组的行为有以下不同:(1)他无法从问题结构过渡到问题解决;(2)因此,初步设计直到会议进行到三分之二时才开始;(3)初步设计阶段非常简单和不稳定,仅由三个独立生成的片段组成;(4)这些片段没有进展或横向发展;(5)没有将抽象信息传递到初步设计或后期阶段;(6)患者无法进入详细设计阶段。这表明,理解我们患者缺陷的关键是理解初步设计阶段涉及的认知过程和机制。我们呼吁一种设计问题解决理论(Goel,1995),该理论将初步设计中涉及的认知过程与“横向”状态转换联系起来,并认为“非结构化”的表示和计算系统对于支持这些转换是必要的。我们得出结论,该系统的神经基础在我们的患者中受到了选择性损伤。