Suppr超能文献

克拉霉素和阿米卡星与克拉霉素和莫西沙星治疗因脓肿分枝杆菌引起的针刺后皮肤感染:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Clarithromycin and amikacin vs. clarithromycin and moxifloxacin for the treatment of post-acupuncture cutaneous infections due to Mycobacterium abscessus: a prospective observational study.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Jul;17(7):1084-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03395.x. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

Abstract

An outbreak of post-acupuncture cutaneous infections due to Mycobacterium abscessus occurred in Ansan, Korea, from November 2007 through to May 2008. During this time a prospective, observational, non-randomized study was conducted involving 52 patients that were diagnosed with cutaneous M. abscessus infection. We compared the clinical response between patients treated with clarithromycin plus amikacin regimen and those treated with clarithromycin plus moxifloxacin regimens with regard to time to resolution of the cutaneous lesions. Among the 52 study patients, 33 were treated with clarithromycin plus amikacin, and 19 were treated with clarithromycin plus moxifloxacin. The baseline characteristics for the treatment groups were not significantly different, except for initial surgical excision (n = 27 vs. 6, respectively, p = 0.001). The median time (weeks) to resolution of the lesions in the clarithromycin plus moxifloxacin-treated subjects was significantly shorter than that in the clarithromycin plus amikacin-treated subjects (17 ± 1.1 vs. 20 ± 0.9, respectively, p = 0.017). With adjustments for age, location of lesions, prior incision and drainage, and excision during medical therapy, clarithromycin plus moxifloxacin-treated subjects were more likely to have resolved lesions (hazard ratio, 0.387; 95% confidence interval, 0.165-0.907; p = 0.029). The frequency of drug-related adverse events in the two treatment groups was not significantly different (n = 18 vs. 14, respectively; p = 0.240). The most common adverse event was gastrointestinal discomfort. The results of our study showed that the combination regimen of clarithromycin and moxifloxacin resulted in a better clinical response than a regimen of clarithromycin plus amikacin when used for treatment of cutaneous M. abscessus infection.

摘要

2007 年 11 月至 2008 年 5 月,韩国安山发生了一起由脓肿分枝杆菌引起的针刺后皮肤感染爆发。在此期间,对 52 名被诊断为皮肤脓肿分枝杆菌感染的患者进行了一项前瞻性、观察性、非随机研究。我们比较了克拉霉素加阿米卡星方案和克拉霉素加莫西沙星方案治疗患者的临床反应,比较了皮肤病变消退的时间。在 52 名研究患者中,33 名患者接受克拉霉素加阿米卡星治疗,19 名患者接受克拉霉素加莫西沙星治疗。两组治疗患者的基线特征无显著差异,除了初始手术切除(分别为 27 例和 6 例,p=0.001)。克拉霉素加莫西沙星治疗组皮损消退的中位时间(周)明显短于克拉霉素加阿米卡星治疗组(分别为 17 ± 1.1 周和 20 ± 0.9 周,p=0.017)。在校正年龄、病变部位、既往切开引流、以及医疗治疗期间切除等因素后,克拉霉素加莫西沙星治疗组更有可能使病变消退(风险比,0.387;95%置信区间,0.165-0.907;p=0.029)。两组治疗组药物相关不良反应的发生率无显著差异(分别为 18 例和 14 例;p=0.240)。最常见的不良反应是胃肠道不适。我们的研究结果表明,克拉霉素联合莫西沙星治疗方案与克拉霉素联合阿米卡星治疗方案相比,在治疗皮肤脓肿分枝杆菌感染方面具有更好的临床疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验