Humphries R M, Yaman P, Bloem T J
Department of Prosthodontics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 8109-1078.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990 Winter;5(4):331-6.
The accuracy of master casts fabricated from three impression techniques commonly used with the Brånemark System was measured. Points placed in a metal surrogate model and onto master abutments were compared after abutments were transferred to stone casts using splinted and unsplinted impression coping techniques. The mean values and standard deviations of each of the reference points on 12 total casts were compared with the values for each point from the surrogate model. Values from techniques using splinted and unsplinted squared polymer copings as well as unsplinted tapered hydrocolloid copings were not significantly different from values recorded from the master surrogate model. Tapered hydrocolloid copings yielded a higher correlation to coordinate values on the master than unsplinted squared polymer copings or splinted squared copings.
测量了使用Brånemark系统时常用的三种印模技术制作的主模型的精度。在使用夹板式和非夹板式印模帽技术将基台转移到石膏模型上之后,对放置在金属替代模型上和主基台上的点进行了比较。将12个全口模型上每个参考点的平均值和标准差与替代模型上每个点的值进行比较。使用夹板式和非夹板式方形聚合物印模帽以及非夹板式锥形水胶体印模帽的技术所得到的值与主替代模型记录的值没有显著差异。与非夹板式方形聚合物印模帽或夹板式方形印模帽相比,锥形水胶体印模帽与主模型上坐标值的相关性更高。