Suppr超能文献

为了夹闭和解脱不可夹闭和不可解脱的动脉瘤而牺牲颈内动脉:血管内闭塞与颈总动脉结扎的比较。

Carotid artery sacrifice for unclippable and uncoilable aneurysms: endovascular occlusion vs common carotid artery ligation.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33136, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2010 Nov;67(5):1431-6; discussion 1437. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181f076ac.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimal treatment of intracranial aneurysms involves complete occlusion of the aneurysm with preservation of the parent artery and all of its branches. Attempts to occlude the aneurysm and preserve the parent artery may be associated with a higher level of risk than parent vessel occlusion or trapping.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate our series of patients with large and giant aneurysms who underwent treatment via endovascular coiling with parent artery sacrifice or surgical ligation of the common carotid artery (CCA) and gain insight into the advantages and risks of each of these alternatives.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients with aneurysms who underwent carotid sacrifice via endovascular occlusion or surgical CCA ligation during an 8-year period at our institution.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients with large and giant aneurysms of the internal carotid artery underwent carotid artery sacrifice via endovascular occlusion (n = 15) or CCA ligation (n = 12). Of the patients who underwent endovascular occlusion, 3 developed groin complications, 1 developed a new sixth nerve palsy, 1 died from vasospasm related to subarachnoid hemorrhage, and 1 died secondary to rupture of an associated 3-mm anterior communicating artery aneurysm 5 days postoperatively. Of the patients undergoing CCA ligation, 1 patient developed a partial hypoglossal palsy. Clinical improvement of presenting symptoms was observed in all surviving patients regardless of the method of treatment. Complete aneurysm obliteration was documented in all patients during the initial hospital stay. The mean radiographic long-term follow-up was 14.2 months, which was available in 20 of the 25 surviving patients (80%). Complete obliteration was confirmed at follow-up in all but 2 patients with large cavernous aneurysms; 1 was initially treated with endovascular occlusion and the other with carotid ligation.

CONCLUSION

Parent artery sacrifice is still a viable treatment for some complex aneurysms of the internal carotid artery. CCA ligation is a reasonable alternative to endovascular arterial sacrifice.

摘要

背景

颅内动脉瘤的最佳治疗方法是完全闭塞动脉瘤,同时保留载瘤动脉及其所有分支。尝试闭塞动脉瘤并保留载瘤动脉可能比单纯闭塞载瘤动脉或夹闭的风险更高。

目的

评估我们一系列接受血管内弹簧圈栓塞伴载瘤动脉牺牲或颈总动脉(CCA)结扎治疗的大型和巨大型动脉瘤患者,了解这两种治疗方法各自的优势和风险。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 8 年来在我院接受颈动脉闭塞的血管内闭塞或手术 CCA 结扎治疗的所有动脉瘤患者。

结果

27 例颈内动脉大型和巨大型动脉瘤患者行颈动脉闭塞血管内栓塞(n=15)或 CCA 结扎(n=12)。行血管内闭塞的患者中,3 例出现腹股沟并发症,1 例出现新的第六神经麻痹,1 例死于蛛网膜下腔出血相关的血管痉挛,1 例死于术后 5 天与 3mm 前交通动脉动脉瘤相关的破裂。行 CCA 结扎的患者中,1 例出现部分舌下神经麻痹。无论治疗方法如何,所有存活患者的临床表现均有改善。所有患者在初次住院期间均证实完全闭塞。平均影像学长期随访 14.2 个月,25 例存活患者中有 20 例(80%)获得随访。除 2 例大型海绵窦动脉瘤患者外,其余患者均在随访中证实完全闭塞;1 例最初接受血管内闭塞治疗,另 1 例接受颈动脉结扎治疗。

结论

对于一些复杂的颈内动脉动脉瘤,载瘤动脉牺牲仍然是一种可行的治疗方法。CCA 结扎是血管内动脉牺牲的合理替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验