Purk J H, Eick J D, Roberts M, Chappell R P, Moore D L
University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Dentistry, 64108.
Quintessence Int. 1990 Aug;21(8):655-62.
The purpose of this study was to test the difference between the strength of the marginal ridge of extracted teeth with a Class I composite resin restoration and the strength of the marginal ridge of teeth with a Class II amalgam restoration with retention grooves. A statistically significant difference in fracture strengths was found among groups. No statistically significant difference was found among restored preparations, beveling technique, and restorative material. Statistically significant differences in fracture strength were found between the whole tooth group and treatment groups; between the whole tooth group and Class II amalgam restoration group; and between the unrestored tooth preparation group and all other tooth groups.
本研究的目的是测试采用I类复合树脂修复的离体牙边缘嵴强度与采用带固位沟的II类银汞合金修复的牙齿边缘嵴强度之间的差异。各组间骨折强度存在统计学上的显著差异。在修复体预备、斜面技术和修复材料之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。在完整牙齿组与治疗组之间、完整牙齿组与II类银汞合金修复组之间以及未修复牙齿预备组与所有其他牙齿组之间发现骨折强度存在统计学上的显著差异。