Suppr超能文献

在边缘嵴处测试的 I 类与 II 类修复前磨牙的断裂强度。2. 洞壁表面粘结以及洞壁表面加牙釉质内部粘结。

Fracture strength of Class I versus Class II restored premolars tested at the marginal ridge. 2. Cavosurface bonding and cavosurface plus internal enamel bonding.

作者信息

Purk J H, Eick J D, Roberts M, Chappell R P, Moore D L

机构信息

University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Dentistry, 64108.

出版信息

Quintessence Int. 1990 Aug;21(8):655-62.

PMID:2094870
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the difference between the strength of the marginal ridge of extracted teeth with a Class I composite resin restoration and the strength of the marginal ridge of teeth with a Class II amalgam restoration with retention grooves. A statistically significant difference in fracture strengths was found among groups. No statistically significant difference was found among restored preparations, beveling technique, and restorative material. Statistically significant differences in fracture strength were found between the whole tooth group and treatment groups; between the whole tooth group and Class II amalgam restoration group; and between the unrestored tooth preparation group and all other tooth groups.

摘要

本研究的目的是测试采用I类复合树脂修复的离体牙边缘嵴强度与采用带固位沟的II类银汞合金修复的牙齿边缘嵴强度之间的差异。各组间骨折强度存在统计学上的显著差异。在修复体预备、斜面技术和修复材料之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。在完整牙齿组与治疗组之间、完整牙齿组与II类银汞合金修复组之间以及未修复牙齿预备组与所有其他牙齿组之间发现骨折强度存在统计学上的显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验