• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种机械表面处理对实验室复合材料修复粘结强度的效果比较。

Comparison of the effect of three mechanical surface treatments on the repair bond strength of a laboratory composite.

作者信息

Kimyai Soodabeh, Mohammadi Narmin, Navimipour Elmira Jafari, Rikhtegaran Sahand

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

出版信息

Photomed Laser Surg. 2010 Oct;28 Suppl 2:S25-30. doi: 10.1089/pho.2009.2598.

DOI:10.1089/pho.2009.2598
PMID:20950189
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the effects of three mechanical surface treatments, including diamond bur, air-abrasion, and Er, Cr: YSGG laser on the repair bond strength of a laboratory composite resin.

BACKGROUND DATA

A proper bonding must be created between the existing composite and the new one for successful repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty cylindrical specimens of a laboratory composite resin (Gradia) were prepared and randomly divided into four groups (n = 15). Groups 2-4 were treated with diamond bur, air-abrasion, and Er, Cr: YSGG laser, respectively; group 1 was the control group, without any mechanical surface treatment. The topographical effects of different mechanical surface treatments were characterized by atomic force microscope. Silane and a bonding agent (Single Bond) were used in all of the groups before adding a direct resin composite. Then, the specimens were subjected to a shear bond strength test. Failure modes were evaluated under a stereomicroscope. All data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey test at a significance level of p < 0.05.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences in bond strengths between the groups (p < 0.0005). Differences in bond strengths between group 1 and the other groups were significant (p < 0.0005). Furthermore, there were significant differences in bond strengths between group 2 and groups 3 and 4 (p < 0.0005), while the bond strength differences between groups 3 and 4 were not significant.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this study, Er, Cr: YSGG laser was confirmed to be as effective as air-abrasion for laboratory composite repair.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了三种机械表面处理方法,即金刚石车针、空气喷砂和铒铬:钇钪镓石榴石(Er, Cr: YSGG)激光对实验室复合树脂修复粘结强度的影响。

背景资料

为成功修复,必须在现有复合材料与新复合材料之间建立适当的粘结。

材料与方法

制备60个实验室复合树脂(Gradia)圆柱形试件,并随机分为四组(n = 15)。第2 - 4组分别用金刚石车针、空气喷砂和Er, Cr: YSGG激光处理;第1组为对照组,未进行任何机械表面处理。用原子力显微镜表征不同机械表面处理的形貌效应。在添加直接树脂复合材料之前,所有组均使用硅烷和粘结剂(单键粘结剂)。然后,对试件进行剪切粘结强度测试。在立体显微镜下评估失效模式。所有数据采用单因素方差分析和Tukey检验进行分析,显著性水平为p < 0.05。

结果

各组间粘结强度存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.0005)。第1组与其他组之间的粘结强度差异显著(p < 0.0005)。此外,第2组与第3组和第4组之间的粘结强度存在显著差异(p < 0.0005),而第3组和第4组之间的粘结强度差异不显著。

结论

基于本研究结果,证实Er, Cr: YSGG激光在实验室复合树脂修复方面与空气喷砂效果相当。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the effect of three mechanical surface treatments on the repair bond strength of a laboratory composite.三种机械表面处理对实验室复合材料修复粘结强度的效果比较。
Photomed Laser Surg. 2010 Oct;28 Suppl 2:S25-30. doi: 10.1089/pho.2009.2598.
2
Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites.表面处理及粘结剂对修复性复合材料粘结强度的影响
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(2):90-8; discussion 99. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00073.x.
3
Tensile bond strength of Er,Cr:YSGG laser-irradiated human dentin and analysis of dentin-resin interface.铒铬:钇钪镓石榴石激光照射下人牙本质的拉伸粘结强度及牙本质-树脂界面分析
Dent Mater. 2007 May;23(5):570-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.016. Epub 2006 Jul 3.
4
Tensile bond strength of composite repairs on Artglass using different surface treatments.
Am J Dent. 2001 Dec;14(6):373-7.
5
Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.窝洞预备器械:对V类树脂基复合树脂修复体微渗漏的影响
Am J Dent. 2001 Jun;14(3):157-62.
6
An in vitro investigation of a comparison of bond strengths of composite to etched and air-abraded human enamel surfaces.复合树脂与酸蚀和空气喷砂处理的人牙釉质表面粘结强度比较的体外研究。
J Prosthodont. 2006 Jan-Feb;15(1):2-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00062.x.
7
Metal surface treatment: characterization and effect on composite-to-metal bond strength.金属表面处理:表征及其对复合材料与金属结合强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2000 Sep-Oct;25(5):427-33.
8
Effect of surface treatment of titanium posts on the tensile bond strength.钛桩表面处理对拉伸粘结强度的影响。
Dent Mater. 2006 Feb;22(2):189-94. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.015. Epub 2005 Jul 21.
9
Shear bond strength between composite resin and denture teeth: effect of tooth type and surface treatments.复合树脂与义齿牙齿之间的剪切粘结强度:牙齿类型和表面处理的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Sep-Oct;16(5):499-504.
10
Laboratory evaluation of surface treatments for composite repair.复合材料修复表面处理的实验室评估。
Oper Dent. 1996 Mar-Apr;21(2):59-62.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Surface Treatments on Repair Bond Strength of Aged Bulk-Fill Resin Composites.表面处理对老化的大块充填树脂复合材料修复粘结强度的影响。
Polymers (Basel). 2025 Aug 28;17(17):2326. doi: 10.3390/polym17172326.
2
The effect of different surface treatments and adhesive systems on shear bond strength in universal nanohybrid composite resin repair.不同表面处理和粘接系统对通用纳米混合复合树脂修复中剪切粘接强度的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Mar 29;25(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05807-8.
3
Effect of different surface treatments on the repair bond strength between aged and new alkasite based restorative material.
不同表面处理方法对新旧 Alkasil 修复材料粘结强度的影响。
F1000Res. 2024 Jun 6;13:319. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.148326.2. eCollection 2024.
4
The efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG laser and contemporary universal adhesive systems on composite resin repair bond strength: an in vitro study.Er,Cr:YSGG 激光与当代通用型粘结系统对复合树脂修复体粘结强度的影响:一项体外研究。
Odontology. 2024 Oct;112(4):1197-1208. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-00932-2. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
5
The comparison of the repair bond strength of the composite resin to direct and indirect composite restorations with different surface preparations.不同表面处理方式下复合树脂对直接和间接复合修复体的修复粘结强度比较。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2023 Spring;17(2):101-108. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2023.35422. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
6
Effect of surface treatment on the repair bond strength of OMNICHROMA and Charisma Diamond ONE resin composites bonded to variable substrates.表面处理对OMNICHROMA和Charisma Diamond ONE树脂复合材料与不同基材粘结时修复粘结强度的影响。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 29;9(7):e17786. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17786. eCollection 2023 Jul.
7
A Comparison of Laser and Mechanical Surface Pretreatment Methods on Shear Bond Strength of Resin Composite to Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer.激光与机械表面预处理方法对树脂复合材料与树脂改性玻璃离子体剪切粘结强度的比较
J Dent (Shiraz). 2023 Mar;24(1 Suppl):103-111. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.92281.1624.
8
Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Repair Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin-Matrix Ceramics.不同表面处理对CAD/CAM树脂基陶瓷修复粘结强度的影响
Materials (Basel). 2022 Sep 12;15(18):6314. doi: 10.3390/ma15186314.
9
Microtensile Repair Bond Strength of a Composite After Accelerated Artificial Aging: Effect of the Air Abrasion, Bur, Er:YAG Laser, Two-Step Self-etch Bonding, and Universal Bonding Repair System.加速人工老化后复合材料的微拉伸修复粘结强度:空气磨蚀、车针、铒钇铝石榴石激光、两步自酸蚀粘结和通用粘结修复系统的影响
J Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Apr 25;13:e18. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2022.18. eCollection 2022.
10
Effect of Varying Working Distances between Sandblasting Device and Composite Substrate Surface on the Repair Bond Strength.喷砂装置与复合基底表面之间不同工作距离对修复粘结强度的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Mar 26;14(7):1621. doi: 10.3390/ma14071621.