• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

物种对圈养的反应差异:应激、福利和比较方法。

Species differences in responses to captivity: stress, welfare and the comparative method.

机构信息

Animal & Poultry Science Department, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada.

出版信息

Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Dec;25(12):713-21. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.08.011. Epub 2010 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2010.08.011
PMID:20952089
Abstract

Approximately 26 billion animals, spanning over 10 000 species, are kept on farms and in zoos, conservation breeding centers, research laboratories and households. Captive animals are often healthier, longer-lived and more fecund than free-living conspecifics, but for some species the opposite is true. Captivity is a very long way from the ideal 'common garden' often assumed by evolutionary and ecological researchers using data for captive animals. The use of comparative methods to investigate the fundamental biological causes of these species differences would help to improve husbandry and enclosure design, and might even reveal relationships between susceptibilities to poor captive welfare and susceptibilities to anthropogenic threat in the wild. Studies of these species differences could also inspire and facilitate 'evo-mecho' research into the functions of behavioral control mechanisms.

摘要

大约有 260 亿只动物,分布在 10000 多个物种中,被饲养在农场、动物园、保护繁殖中心、研究实验室和家庭中。圈养动物通常比自由生活的同种动物更健康、寿命更长、繁殖力更强,但对某些物种来说则恰恰相反。圈养与进化和生态研究人员常用的数据所假设的“共同花园”相去甚远。利用比较方法研究这些物种差异的基本生物学原因,将有助于改善饲养和围栏设计,甚至可能揭示在圈养条件下易受不良福利影响与在野外易受人为威胁之间的关系。对这些物种差异的研究也可以启发和促进行为控制机制功能的“进化-生态回声”研究。

相似文献

1
Species differences in responses to captivity: stress, welfare and the comparative method.物种对圈养的反应差异:应激、福利和比较方法。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Dec;25(12):713-21. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.08.011. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
2
A comparative approach to the study of Keeper-Animal Relationships in the zoo.动物园中饲养员与动物关系研究的比较方法。
Zoo Biol. 2009 Nov;28(6):589-608. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20289.
3
There are big gaps in our knowledge, and thus approach, to zoo animal welfare: a case for evidence-based zoo animal management.我们在动物园动物福利的认知以及相应方法上存在巨大差距:这表明需要基于证据的动物园动物管理。
Zoo Biol. 2009 Nov;28(6):574-88. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20288.
4
Phylogenetic comparative methods: Harnessing the power of species diversity to investigate welfare issues in captive wild animals.系统发育比较方法:利用物种多样性的力量研究圈养野生动物的福利问题。
Zoo Biol. 2018 Sep;37(5):369-388. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21427. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
5
Visitors' effects on the welfare of animals in the zoo: a review.游客对动物园动物福利的影响:综述
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2007;10(2):169-83. doi: 10.1080/10888700701313595.
6
Socio-ecological factors correlate with levels of stereotypic behavior in zoo-housed primates.社会生态因素与圈养灵长类动物的刻板行为水平相关。
Behav Processes. 2013 Sep;98:85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 May 18.
7
Relevance of management and feeding regimens on life expectancy in captive deer.管理和饲养方案对圈养鹿寿命的相关性。
Am J Vet Res. 2010 Mar;71(3):275-80. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.71.3.275.
8
An assessment of gum-based environmental enrichment for captive gummivorous primates.对圈养食胶灵长类动物基于口香糖的环境富集的评估。
Zoo Biol. 2011 Jan-Feb;30(1):71-8. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20321.
9
Behavioral and hormonal consequences of transporting giant pandas from China to the United States.大熊猫从中国运输至美国的行为及激素影响
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2012;15(1):1-20. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2012.624046.
10
Value of captive populations for quantitative genetics research.圈养种群在数量遗传学研究中的价值。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 May;24(5):263-70. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.11.013. Epub 2009 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Appraisal of Allostatic Load in Wild Boars Under a Controlled Environment.在可控环境下对野猪应激负荷的评估。
Vet Sci. 2025 Jul 16;12(7):667. doi: 10.3390/vetsci12070667.
2
Survey of husbandry practices and captive environments for North Island brown kiwi housed in facilities within and outside New Zealand.对新西兰境内外设施中饲养的北岛褐几维鸟的饲养管理实践和圈养环境的调查。
Anim Welf. 2025 Jun 20;34:e41. doi: 10.1017/S0962728625100109. eCollection 2025.
3
Updating conservation metagenomics on the gut microbiome of threatened mammals.
更新关于濒危哺乳动物肠道微生物群的保护宏基因组学。
iScience. 2025 Jun 25;28(7):113000. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113000. eCollection 2025 Jul 18.
4
Chains of Commerce: A Comprehensive Review of Animal Welfare Impacts in the International Wildlife Trade.商业链条:对国际野生动物贸易中动物福利影响的全面综述
Animals (Basel). 2025 Mar 27;15(7):971. doi: 10.3390/ani15070971.
5
Evidence of self-care tooling and phylogenetic modeling reveal parrot tool use is not rare.自我护理工具使用和系统发育建模的证据表明,鹦鹉使用工具并不罕见。
iScience. 2025 Mar 4;28(4):112156. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112156. eCollection 2025 Apr 18.
6
A Metric-Based, Meta-Analytic Appraisal of Environmental Enrichment Efficacy in Captive Primates.基于指标的圈养灵长类动物环境丰容效果的元分析评估
Animals (Basel). 2025 Mar 11;15(6):799. doi: 10.3390/ani15060799.
7
Steroid Hormone Metabolite Levels in European Minks: Implications for the Conservation of a Threatened Species.欧洲水貂体内类固醇激素代谢物水平:对一个受威胁物种保护工作的启示
Zoo Biol. 2025 May-Jun;44(3):237-247. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21890. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
8
Linking Gut Microbiota and Stereotypic Behavior of Endangered Species Under Ex Situ Conservation: First Evidence from Sun Bears.圈养保护下濒危物种肠道微生物群与刻板行为的关联:马来貘的首个证据
Animals (Basel). 2025 Feb 4;15(3):435. doi: 10.3390/ani15030435.
9
Recognising depression in non-human primates: a narrative review of reported signs of depression.识别非人灵长类动物的抑郁症:对已报道的抑郁迹象的叙述性综述。
PeerJ. 2025 Jan 7;13:e18766. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18766. eCollection 2025.
10
Exploring the Gastrointestinal Microbiome of Eurasian Griffon Vultures () Under Rehabilitation in Portugal and Their Potential Role as Reservoirs of Human and Animal Pathogens.探索葡萄牙康复中的欧亚兀鹫的胃肠道微生物群及其作为人类和动物病原体宿主的潜在作用。
Vet Sci. 2024 Dec 4;11(12):622. doi: 10.3390/vetsci11120622.