• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估社会对人乳头瘤病毒疫苗和宫颈涂片筛查计划的偏好。

Evaluating societal preferences for human papillomavirus vaccine and cervical smear test screening programme.

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2146 East Mall, Vancouver V5Z163, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Sex Transm Infect. 2011 Feb;87(1):52-7. doi: 10.1136/sti.2009.041392. Epub 2010 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1136/sti.2009.041392
PMID:20956352
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer and genital warts are diseases associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Cervical smear testing is used as a cervical cancer screening tool in most countries worldwide. The newly introduced vaccines that prevent HPV infections are the quadrivalent vaccine (Gardasil), which prevents genital warts and cervical cancer, and the bivalent vaccine (Cervarix), which prevents cervical cancer only. Public preferences for HPV vaccines and smear test screening were determined using a discrete choice experiment.

METHODS

Participants from across Canada completed a choice-based questionnaire to measure preferences from which willingness to pay (WTP) was calculated for the following: (1) lifetime risk of cervical cancer and genital warts, (2) frequency of smear testing, (3) need for vaccine booster, (4) target group to vaccinate, (5) frequency of side effects and (6) cost of the vaccine (from 2008). A mixed effect logistic model was used to analyse the data.

RESULTS

Of the 1157 participants, the mean age was 44 years (SD 15) and 49% were women. Respondents preferred a vaccine that gave lifelong immunity, a vaccination programme that targeted boys and girls and a vaccine that gave protection from genital warts and cervical cancer. Respondents were averse to yearly smear testing. On average, respondents were willing to pay $C53 and $C22 to avoid a 1% increase in the risk of cervical cancer and genital warts, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Society agrees with the introduction of the HPV vaccination programme, but would prefer a programme that targets boys and girls with the quadrivalent vaccine.

摘要

背景

宫颈癌和生殖器疣是人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染相关的疾病。宫颈涂片检查在世界范围内的大多数国家被用作宫颈癌筛查工具。新引入的预防 HPV 感染的疫苗有四价疫苗(加德西),可预防生殖器疣和宫颈癌,以及二价疫苗(佳达修),仅预防宫颈癌。使用离散选择实验来确定 HPV 疫苗和涂片检查筛查的公众偏好。

方法

来自加拿大各地的参与者完成了基于选择的问卷,以衡量以下方面的偏好:(1)宫颈癌和生殖器疣的终身风险,(2)涂片检查的频率,(3)疫苗加强针的需求,(4)接种疫苗的目标人群,(5)副作用的频率,以及(6)疫苗的成本(2008 年)。使用混合效应逻辑模型分析数据。

结果

在 1157 名参与者中,平均年龄为 44 岁(标准差 15),49%为女性。受访者更喜欢一种能提供终身免疫力的疫苗、一种针对男孩和女孩的疫苗接种计划,以及一种能预防生殖器疣和宫颈癌的疫苗。受访者不喜欢每年进行涂片检查。平均而言,受访者愿意支付 53 加元和 22 加元,以避免宫颈癌和生殖器疣风险分别增加 1%。

结论

社会赞成引入 HPV 疫苗接种计划,但更倾向于针对男孩和女孩的四价疫苗接种计划。

相似文献

1
Evaluating societal preferences for human papillomavirus vaccine and cervical smear test screening programme.评估社会对人乳头瘤病毒疫苗和宫颈涂片筛查计划的偏好。
Sex Transm Infect. 2011 Feb;87(1):52-7. doi: 10.1136/sti.2009.041392. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
2
Prevention strategies against the human papillomavirus: the effectiveness of vaccination.针对人乳头瘤病毒的预防策略:疫苗接种的有效性。
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Nov;107(2 Suppl 1):S19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.07.068.
3
HPV vaccine promotion: does referring to both cervical cancer and genital warts affect intended and actual vaccination behavior?HPV 疫苗推广:提及宫颈癌和生殖器疣是否会影响预期和实际的疫苗接种行为?
Womens Health Issues. 2011 Jan-Feb;21(1):71-9. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2010.08.004.
4
Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and recent advances in vaccination against human papillomavirus.人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的流行病学、临床表现和最新进展。
Postgrad Med. 2010 Mar;122(2):121-9. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2010.03.2129.
5
A brief history of economic evaluation for human papillomavirus vaccination policy.人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种政策经济评估简史
Sex Health. 2010 Sep;7(3):352-8. doi: 10.1071/SH10018.
6
The new human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine: pros and cons for pediatric and adolescent health.新型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗:对儿童及青少年健康的利弊
Pediatr Nurs. 2008 Sep-Oct;34(5):429-31.
7
Human papillomavirus, cervical cancer, and the vaccines.人乳头瘤病毒、宫颈癌与疫苗
Postgrad Med. 2008 Jul;120(2):79-84. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2008.07.1794.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis for Pap smear screening and human papillomavirus DNA testing and vaccination.巴氏涂片筛查、人乳头瘤病毒 DNA 检测与疫苗接种的成本效益分析。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;17(6):1050-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01453.x. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
9
Promising strategies for cervical cancer screening in the post-human papillomavirus vaccination era.人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种后时代宫颈癌筛查的前景策略。
Sex Health. 2010 Sep;7(3):376-82. doi: 10.1071/SH10022.
10
Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines: a Canadian update.人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗:加拿大最新情况
Issues Emerg Health Technol. 2007 Dec(109):1-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Communication on HPV Vaccination to Parents of 11- to 14-Year-Old Adolescents in France: A Discrete Choice Experiment.优化法国 11-14 岁青少年父母 HPV 疫苗接种沟通:一项离散选择实验。
Patient. 2024 Sep;17(5):575-588. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00687-6. Epub 2024 May 1.
2
Identifying the impact of social influences in health-related discrete choice experiments.识别健康相关离散选择实验中社会影响的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 19;17(10):e0276141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276141. eCollection 2022.
3
Would Chinese Men Who Have Sex With Men Take Up Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Screening as an Alternative Prevention Strategy to HPV Vaccination?
与男性发生性行为的中国男性会将人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)筛查作为HPV疫苗接种的替代预防策略吗?
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 3;9:904873. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.904873. eCollection 2022.
4
Vaccine preferences driving vaccine-decision making of different target groups: a systematic review of choice-based experiments.疫苗偏好驱动不同目标群体的疫苗决策:基于选择的实验系统评价。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 28;21(1):879. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06398-9.
5
Mothers' preferences and willingness-to-pay for human papillomavirus vaccines in Iran: A discrete choice experiment study.伊朗母亲对人乳头瘤病毒疫苗的偏好及支付意愿:一项离散选择实验研究
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Jun 6;23:101438. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101438. eCollection 2021 Sep.
6
No Such Thing as a Free-Rider? Understanding Drivers of Childhood and Adult Vaccination through a Multicountry Discrete Choice Experiment.不存在搭便车者吗?通过一项多国离散选择实验理解儿童和成人疫苗接种的驱动因素。
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Mar 16;9(3):264. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9030264.
7
Social inequalities in cervical cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment among French general practitioners and gynaecologists.社会不平等与宫颈癌筛查:法国全科医生和妇科医生的离散选择实验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 27;20(1):693. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05479-w.
8
Preferential differences in vaccination decision-making for oneself or one's child in The Netherlands: a discrete choice experiment.荷兰人在为自己或孩子接种疫苗时的决策偏好差异:一项离散选择实验。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):828. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08844-w.
9
[The STIKO now recommends the HPV vaccination for boys too].[德国常设疫苗委员会(STIKO)现在也建议男孩接种人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗]
Urologe A. 2018 Nov;57(11):1346-1350. doi: 10.1007/s00120-018-0793-1.
10
3. How comprehensive can we be in the economic assessment of vaccines?3. 在疫苗的经济评估中,我们能做到多全面?
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2017 Aug 31;5(1):1336044. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2017.1336044. eCollection 2017.