Suppr超能文献

为什么语义性痴呆会让你“谈狗色变(但不会谈马色变)”:一种理论解释。

Why semantic dementia drives you to the dogs (but not to the horses): A theoretical account.

出版信息

Cogn Neuropsychol. 2002 Sep 1;19(6):483-503. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000068.

Abstract

This paper describes a patient (IH) with semantic dementia and severe impairment in all semantic categories except for numerical knowledge, which was preserved. IH showed a severe deficit in reading and writing non-number words (e.g., candle, juice) and nonwords, and preservation of reading and writing number words (e.g., one, forty) and numerals (e.g., 1, 40). IH's pattern of performance can be explained by the combination of a selective sparing of one semantic category--i.e., numbers--with a total deficit of nonsemantic processes for mapping letters and sounds. As number was the only spared semantic category in the presence of these other nonsemantic deficits, it follows that the semantic route is sufficient for accurate reading and spelling. Our data clarify the nature of reading and writing processes and support the functional and neuroanatomical independence of the number domain.

摘要

本文描述了一位语义性痴呆患者(IH),其所有语义类别均严重受损,除了数值知识,该知识得以保留。IH 在阅读和书写非数字单词(例如,蜡烛,果汁)和非单词方面存在严重缺陷,而在阅读和书写数字单词(例如,一,四十)和数字(例如,1,40)方面则保留了下来。IH 的表现模式可以通过以下两种情况的组合来解释:一种是一种语义类别(即数字)的选择性保留,另一种是将字母和声音映射的非语义过程的完全缺失。由于在存在这些其他非语义缺陷的情况下,数字是唯一保留的语义类别,因此语义途径足以实现准确的阅读和拼写。我们的数据阐明了阅读和书写过程的性质,并支持了数字域的功能和神经解剖独立性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验