Suppr超能文献

[保护性回肠造口术与保护性横结肠造口术。现有哪些证据?]

[Protective ileostoma versus protective transverse stoma. What evidence is available?].

作者信息

Klink C D, Willis S, Neumann U P, Jansen M

机构信息

Klinik für Allgemein und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen, Deutschland.

出版信息

Chirurg. 2010 Nov;81(11):974-7. doi: 10.1007/s00104-010-1930-6.

Abstract

The clinical outcome of anastomotic leakage in colorectal and coloanal anastomoses necessitates a loop stoma for fecal diversion. Controversy remains of the most suitable position of the stoma. In this respect a loop ileostomy or loop colostomy can be performed. The aim of this study was to determine the advantages and disadvantages of both surgical strategies from the literature and to derive possible recommendations. Both methods provide a good operative outcome with low complication rates. Overall there is a trend towards ileostomy because of lower complication rates after stoma creation and the incidence of sepsis and stoma prolapse in particular is significantly reduced after ileostomy. Concerning stoma reversal both methods seem to be equivalent. As long as no large evidenced-based, randomized studies are available loop ileostomy seems to be the most appropriate surgical procedure.

摘要

结直肠吻合口漏的临床结局需要行袢式造口进行粪便转流。造口的最佳位置仍存在争议。在这方面,可以施行袢式回肠造口术或袢式结肠造口术。本研究的目的是从文献中确定这两种手术策略的优缺点,并得出可能的建议。两种方法均能带来良好的手术效果,并发症发生率低。总体而言,由于造口术后并发症发生率较低,尤其是回肠造口术后脓毒症和造口脱垂的发生率显著降低,因此有采用回肠造口术的趋势。关于造口还纳,两种方法似乎等效。只要没有大型的循证随机研究,袢式回肠造口术似乎是最合适的手术方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验