Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Oct 20;92(14):2402-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00456.
Injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament are the most common surgically treated knee ligament injury. There is no consensus regarding the optimal graft choice between allograft and autograft tissue. Postoperative septic arthritis is an uncommon complication after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare infection rates between procedures with use of allograft and autograft tissue in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
A combined prospective and retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed over a three-year period. Graft selection was determined by the individual surgeon. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were equivalent for the two groups (allograft and autograft tissue). Data collected included demographic characteristics, clinical information, and graft details. Patients were followed for a minimum of 5.5 months postoperatively. Our primary outcome was intra-articular infection following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Of the 1298 patients who had anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during the study period, 861 met the criteria for inclusion and formed the final study group. Two hundred and twenty-one patients (25.6%) received an autograft, and 640 (74.3%) received an allograft. There were no cases of septic arthritis in either group. The 95% confidence interval was 0% to 0.57% for the allograft group and 0% to 1.66% for the autograft group. The rate of superficial infections in the entire study group was 2.32%. We did not identify a significant difference in the rate of superficial infections between autograft and allograft reconstruction in our study group.
While the theoretical risk of disease transmission inherent with allograft tissue cannot be eliminated, we found no increased clinical risk of infection with the use of allograft tissue compared with autologous tissue for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
前交叉韧带损伤是最常见的需要手术治疗的膝关节韧带损伤。异体移植物和自体移植物组织之间哪种是最佳的移植选择,目前尚无共识。术后化脓性关节炎是前交叉韧带重建后少见的并发症。本研究的目的是比较使用同种异体和自体组织进行初次前交叉韧带重建的感染率。
进行了为期三年的前瞻性和回顾性多中心队列研究。移植物的选择由术者决定。两组(同种异体和自体组织)的纳入和排除标准相同。收集的数据包括人口统计学特征、临床信息和移植物细节。患者术后至少随访 5.5 个月。我们的主要结局是前交叉韧带重建后关节内感染。
在研究期间,有 1298 例患者接受了前交叉韧带重建,其中 861 例符合纳入标准并纳入最终研究组。221 例(25.6%)患者接受了自体移植物,640 例(74.3%)患者接受了同种异体移植物。两组均无化脓性关节炎病例。同种异体移植物组的 95%置信区间为 0%至 0.57%,自体移植物组为 0%至 1.66%。整个研究组的浅表感染率为 2.32%。我们未发现自体和同种异体重建组浅表感染率存在显著差异。
虽然同种异体组织固有的疾病传播理论风险无法消除,但与使用自体组织相比,我们未发现使用同种异体组织进行初次前交叉韧带重建会增加感染的临床风险。