• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们能否改善无行为能力患者的治疗决策?

Can we improve treatment decision-making for incapacitated patients?

机构信息

Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, USA.

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 2010 Sep-Oct;40(5):36-45. doi: 10.1353/hcr.2010.0001.

DOI:10.1353/hcr.2010.0001
PMID:20964162
Abstract

When patients cannot make their own treatment decisions, surrogates typically step in to do it for them. Surrogate decision-making is far from ideal, of course, as the surrogate may not know what the patient prefers or what best promotes her interests. One way to improve it would be to arm surrogates with information about what patients in similar circumstances tend to prefer, allowing them to make empirically grounded predictions about what their patient would want.

摘要

当患者无法自行做出治疗决策时,通常会由代理人来代其做出决策。当然,这种代理决策并不理想,因为代理人可能并不了解患者的偏好或什么最能促进患者的利益。一种改进方法是为代理人提供有关类似情况下患者通常偏好的信息,使他们能够根据经验对患者的需求做出预测。

相似文献

1
Can we improve treatment decision-making for incapacitated patients?我们能否改善无行为能力患者的治疗决策?
Hastings Cent Rep. 2010 Sep-Oct;40(5):36-45. doi: 10.1353/hcr.2010.0001.
2
Incapacitated Surrogates: A New and Increasing Dilemma in Hospital Care.无行为能力的替代决策者:医院护理中一个新出现且日益棘手的难题。
J Clin Ethics. 2017 Winter;28(4):279-289.
3
The Trial of Ascertaining Individual Preferences for Loved Ones' Role in End-of-Life Decisions (TAILORED) Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Surrogate Decision Making.确定亲人在生命末期决策中角色偏好的试验(TAILORED):一项改善代理决策的随机对照试验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Oct;54(4):455-465. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
4
Care of Patients at the End of Life: Surrogate Decision Making for Incapacitated Patients.临终患者的护理:无行为能力患者的替代决策制定
FP Essent. 2016 Aug;447:32-41.
5
A new method for making treatment decisions for incapacitated patients: what do patients think about the use of a patient preference predictor?一种为无行为能力患者做出治疗决策的新方法:患者对使用患者偏好预测器有何看法?
J Med Ethics. 2016 Apr;42(4):235-41. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103001. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
6
How Surrogates Decide: A Secondary Data Analysis of Decision-Making Principles Used by the Surrogates of Hospitalized Older Adults.代理人如何决策:对住院老年患者代理人所使用决策原则的二次数据分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Dec;32(12):1285-1293. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4158-z. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
7
Marginally Represented Patients and the Moral Authority of Surrogates.边缘性代表患者与代理人的道德权威。
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Feb;20(2):44-48. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1701732.
8
A new standard for incapacitated patient decision making: the clinical standard of surrogate empowerment.无行为能力患者决策的新标准:代理人赋权的临床标准。
J Clin Ethics. 2012 Winter;23(4):316-30.
9
Use of a patient preference predictor to help make medical decisions for incapacitated patients.使用患者偏好预测器来帮助为无行为能力的患者做出医疗决策。
J Med Philos. 2014 Apr;39(2):104-29. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhu001. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
10
How do clinicians prepare family members for the role of surrogate decision-maker?临床医生如何使家属为代理人决策角色做准备?
J Med Ethics. 2018 Jan;44(1):21-26. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103808. Epub 2017 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review for the artificial intelligence-guided patient preference predictor.预测患者报告的结局指标:人工智能引导的患者偏好预测器的范围综述
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Nov 5;7:1477447. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1477447. eCollection 2024.
2
Incorporating Patient Values in Large Language Model Recommendations for Surrogate and Proxy Decisions.将患者价值观纳入大型语言模型推荐的代理人和代表决策中。
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Aug 12;6(8):e1131. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001131. eCollection 2024 Aug 1.
3
Protecting Incapacitated Patients' Rights and Best Interests.
保护无行为能力患者的权利和最大利益。
Indian J Palliat Care. 2023 Oct-Dec;29(4):343-347. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_173_2022. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
4
Ethics of the algorithmic prediction of goal of care preferences: from theory to practice.算法预测目标关怀偏好的伦理:从理论到实践。
J Med Ethics. 2023 Mar;49(3):165-174. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108371. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
5
Surrogate Perspectives on Patient Preference Predictors: Good Idea, but I Should Decide How They Are Used.替代者对患者偏好预测因素的看法:好主意,但应由我决定如何使用它们。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2022 Apr-Jun;13(2):125-135. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2040643. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
6
Variability of Prognostic Communication in Critically Ill Neurologic Patients: A Pilot Multicenter Mixed-Methods Study.重症神经科患者预后沟通的可变性:一项多中心混合方法试点研究
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Feb 21;4(2):e0640. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000640. eCollection 2022 Feb.
7
Predictors of Family Dissatisfaction with Support During Neurocritical Care Shared Decision-Making.神经危重症监护共享决策中家庭对支持不满意的预测因素。
Neurocrit Care. 2021 Dec;35(3):714-722. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01211-6. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
8
Psychological Attachment Orientations of Surrogate Decision-Makers and Goals-of-Care Decisions for Brain Injury Patients in ICUs.重症监护病房中脑损伤患者的替代决策者的心理依恋取向与医疗照护目标决策
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Jul 6;2(7):e0151. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000151. eCollection 2020 Jul.
9
Concerns of surrogate decision makers for patients with acute brain injury: A US population survey.急性脑损伤患者的代理人决策关注因素:一项美国人群调查。
Neurology. 2020 May 12;94(19):e2054-e2068. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009406. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
10
Neurologists and end-of-life decision-making: The role of "protective paternalism".神经科医生与临终决策:“保护性家长主义”的作用。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2015 Feb;5(1):6-8. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000096.