• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者小组支持工具对医疗服务的影响。

Effect of a patient panel-support tool on care delivery.

机构信息

Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR 97227, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2010 Oct 1;16(10):e256-66.

PMID:20964477
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of a patient panel-support tool (PST) on care delivery for diabetes mellitus (DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective longitudinal cohort study among primary care providers (PCPs), with 2005 as the preintervention, 2006 as the implementation, and 2007 as the postintervention period.

METHODS

We estimated the intervention effect using electronic medical record data and hierarchical linear models. The intervention was a PST displaying "care gaps" and recommendations for glycosylated hemoglobin, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and blood pressure screening and control; retinopathy, nephropathy, and foot screening; aspirin, statin, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or beta-blocker use; and influenza and pneumococcal vaccination. Participants were qualifying PCPs and health maintenance organizations; patients. Patients had DM or CVD and 12 months of membership (n = 30,273 DM; 26,414 CVD). Main measures were mean percentages of care recommendations that were met by PCPs per patient per month (the care score).

RESULTS

From 2005 to 2007, the mean care score (95% confidence interval) increased for both DM and CVD, from 63.5 (62.7, 64.3) to 70.6 (69.8, 71.4) and from 67.9 (67.2, 68.7) to 72.6 (71.9, 73.3), respectively. After adjustments, DM and CVD patients had improvements in the care score of 7.6 and 5.1, respectively, in 2007 compared with 2005 (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Delivery of care recommendations for DM and CVD improved after implementation of a PST. More research is necessary to optimize results and determine whether patient outcomes improve.

摘要

目的

评估患者小组支持工具(PST)对糖尿病(DM)和心血管疾病(CVD)护理提供的影响。

研究设计

针对初级保健提供者(PCP)的回顾性纵向队列研究,2005 年为干预前,2006 年为实施期,2007 年为干预后。

方法

我们使用电子病历数据和分层线性模型来估计干预效果。干预措施是一种 PST,显示“护理差距”以及糖化血红蛋白、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和血压筛查和控制、视网膜病变、肾病和足部筛查、阿司匹林、他汀类药物和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或β受体阻滞剂的使用、流感和肺炎球菌疫苗接种的建议。参与者为合格的 PCP 和健康维护组织;患者。患者患有 DM 或 CVD,且有 12 个月的会员资格(n = 30273 DM;26414 CVD)。主要措施是每个患者每个月 PCP 满足的护理建议的平均百分比(护理评分)。

结果

从 2005 年到 2007 年,DM 和 CVD 的平均护理评分(95%置信区间)分别从 63.5(62.7,64.3)增加到 70.6(69.8,71.4)和从 67.9(67.2,68.7)增加到 72.6(71.9,73.3)。调整后,与 2005 年相比,2007 年 DM 和 CVD 患者的护理评分分别提高了 7.6 和 5.1(P <.001)。

结论

实施 PST 后,DM 和 CVD 的护理建议的提供得到了改善。需要进一步研究以优化结果并确定患者的结局是否得到改善。

相似文献

1
Effect of a patient panel-support tool on care delivery.患者小组支持工具对医疗服务的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Oct 1;16(10):e256-66.
2
Impact of cardiovascular disease on health care utilization in a defined diabetic population.心血管疾病对特定糖尿病患者群体医疗保健利用情况的影响。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Oct;47(10):1133-42. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90100-7.
3
Comparative effectiveness of outpatient cardiovascular disease and diabetes care delivery between advanced practice providers and physician providers in primary care: Implications for care under the Affordable Care Act.初级保健中高级执业提供者与医师提供者在门诊心血管疾病和糖尿病护理提供方面的比较效果:对《平价医疗法案》下护理的影响。
Am Heart J. 2016 Nov;181:74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.07.020. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
4
Exploring Clinical Care Among Adults With Diabetes Mellitus: Alignment With Recommended Statin and Sulfonylureas Treatment.探索成年糖尿病患者的临床护理:与推荐的他汀类药物和磺酰脲类药物治疗的一致性。
Can J Diabetes. 2019 Oct;43(7):498-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
5
Glycated Hemoglobin Level Goal Achievement in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in Canada: Still Room for Improvement.加拿大 2 型糖尿病成人糖化血红蛋白水平达标情况:仍有改进空间。
Can J Diabetes. 2019 Aug;43(6):384-391. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
6
The impact of a physician-directed health information technology system on diabetes outcomes in primary care: a pre- and post-implementation study.医生主导的健康信息技术系统对初级保健中糖尿病治疗效果的影响:一项实施前后的研究。
Inform Prim Care. 2009;17(3):165-74. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v17i3.731.
7
Evaluation of pharmacist-managed diabetes mellitus under a collaborative drug therapy agreement.在合作药物治疗协议下对药剂师管理的糖尿病进行评估。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Oct 1;65(19):1841-5. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070568.
8
Primary care physicians' practice regarding diabetes mellitus diagnosis, evaluation and management in the West region of Cameroon.喀麦隆西部地区基层医疗医生对糖尿病的诊断、评估及管理实践
BMC Endocr Disord. 2015 Apr 4;15:18. doi: 10.1186/s12902-015-0016-3.
9
Use of automated reminder letters to improve diabetes management in primary care: outcomes of a quality improvement initiative.使用自动提醒信函改善基层医疗中的糖尿病管理:一项质量改进举措的结果
Qual Prim Care. 2013;21(6):359-68.
10
Association between physician time-unlimited vs time-limited internal medicine board certification and ambulatory patient care quality.医师不限时与限时内科认证与门诊患者医疗质量的关联。
JAMA. 2014 Dec 10;312(22):2358-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13992.

引用本文的文献

1
Burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover intention among primary care nurse practitioners with their own patient panels.具有自有患者群体的初级保健执业护士的倦怠、工作满意度和离职意愿。
Nurs Outlook. 2024 Jul-Aug;72(4):102190. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102190. Epub 2024 May 23.
2
Systematic review and narrative synthesis of computerized audit and feedback systems in healthcare.医疗保健领域计算机化审核与反馈系统的系统评价及叙述性综合分析
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 May 11;29(6):1106-1119. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac031.
3
Effect of Clinical Decision Support at Community Health Centers on the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.
社区卫生中心的临床决策支持对心血管疾病风险的影响:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2146519. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46519.
4
Challenges involved in establishing a web-based clinical decision support tool in community health centers.建立社区卫生中心基于网络的临床决策支持工具所面临的挑战。
Healthc (Amst). 2020 Dec;8(4):100488. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100488. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
5
Decrease in unnecessary vitamin D testing using clinical decision support tools: making it harder to do the wrong thing.使用临床决策支持工具减少不必要的维生素D检测:让做错事变得更难。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jul 1;24(4):776-780. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw182.
6
The Change in HbA1c Associated with Initial Adherence and Subsequent Change in Adherence among Diabetes Patients Newly Initiating Metformin Therapy.新起始接受二甲双胍治疗的糖尿病患者初始依从性及随后依从性变化与 HbA1c 的变化。
J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:9687815. doi: 10.1155/2016/9687815. Epub 2016 Aug 7.
7
Clinical Decision Support Systems and Prevention: A Community Guide Cardiovascular Disease Systematic Review.临床决策支持系统与预防:《社区心血管疾病预防指南》系统评价
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Nov;49(5):784-795. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.006.
8
Associations between healthcare quality and use of electronic health record functions in ambulatory care.门诊医疗中医疗质量与电子健康记录功能使用之间的关联。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul;22(4):864-71. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv030. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
9
The panel management questionnaire: a tool to measure panel management capability.专家小组管理调查问卷:一种衡量专家小组管理能力的工具。
Perm J. 2015 Spring;19(2):4-9. doi: 10.7812/TPP/14-170. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
10
Improving care for older adults: a model to segment the senior population.改善老年人护理:一种对老年人群进行细分的模式。
Perm J. 2014 Summer;18(3):18-21. doi: 10.7812/TPP/14-005. Epub 2014 Jun 9.