Suppr超能文献

医师不限时与限时内科认证与门诊患者医疗质量的关联。

Association between physician time-unlimited vs time-limited internal medicine board certification and ambulatory patient care quality.

机构信息

Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

GIM Section, Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

出版信息

JAMA. 2014 Dec 10;312(22):2358-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13992.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) initiatives encourage internists with time-unlimited certificates to recertify. However, there are limited data evaluating differences in performance between internists with time-limited or time-unlimited board certification.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there are differences in primary care quality between physicians holding time-limited or time-unlimited certification.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective analysis of performance data from 1 year (2012-2013) at 4 Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers. Participants were internists with time-limited (n = 71) or time-unlimited (n = 34) ABIM certification providing primary care to 68,213 patients. Median physician panel size was 610 patients (range, 19-1316), with no differences between groups (P = .90).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Ten primary care performance measures: colorectal screening rates; diabetes with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c level) less than 9.0%; diabetes with blood pressure less than 140/90 mm Hg; diabetes with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level less than 100 mg/dL; hypertension with blood pressure less than 140/90 mm Hg; thiazide diuretics used in multidrug hypertensive regimen; atherosclerotic coronary artery disease and LDL-C level less than 100 mg/dL; post-myocardial infarction use of aspirin; post-myocardial infarction use of β-blockers; congestive heart failure (CHF) with use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor.

RESULTS

After adjustment for practice site, panel size, years since certification, and clustering by physician, there were no differences in outcomes for patients cared for by internists with time-limited or time-unlimited certification for any performance measure: colorectal screening (odds ratio [OR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.89-1.01]); diabetes with HbA1c level less than 9.0% (OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.74-1.2]); blood pressure control (OR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.69-1.4]); LDL-C level less than 100 mg/dL (OR, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.79-1.5]); hypertension with blood pressure less than 140/90 mm Hg (OR, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.92-1.2]); thiazide use (OR, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.8-1.3]); atherosclerotic coronary artery disease with LDL-C level less than 100 mg/dL (OR, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.75-1.7]); post-myocardial infarction use of aspirin (OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.58-1.68]) or β-blockers (OR, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.57-1.9]); CHF with use of ACE inhibitor (OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.61-1.6]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among internists providing primary care at 4 VA medical centers, there were no significant differences between those with time-limited ABIM certification and those with time-unlimited ABIM certification on 10 primary care performance measures. Additional research to examine the difference in patient outcomes among holders of time-limited and time-unlimited certificates in non-VA and nonacademic settings and the association with other ABIM goals may help clarify the potential benefit of Maintenance of Certification participation.

摘要

重要性

美国内科委员会(ABIM)的倡议鼓励持有无限期证书的内科医生重新认证。然而,关于在有限时间内获得认证和无限时间内获得认证的内科医生在表现上的差异,数据有限。

目的

确定在初级保健质量方面,持有有限时间或无限时间证书的医生是否存在差异。

设计、地点和参与者:对 4 家退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗中心 1 年(2012-2013 年)的数据进行回顾性分析。参与者为在 68213 名患者中提供初级保健的有限时间(n=71)或无限时间(n=34)ABIM 认证的内科医生。医生小组的中位数大小为 610 名患者(范围为 19-1316 名),两组之间没有差异(P=0.90)。

主要结果和测量

10 项初级保健绩效指标:结直肠癌筛查率;糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c 水平)低于 9.0%的糖尿病;血压低于 140/90mmHg 的糖尿病;低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平低于 100mg/dL 的糖尿病;血压低于 140/90mmHg 的高血压;噻嗪类利尿剂在多药高血压方案中的使用;动脉粥样硬化性冠心病和 LDL-C 水平低于 100mg/dL;心肌梗死后使用阿司匹林;心肌梗死后使用β受体阻滞剂;心力衰竭(CHF)使用血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂。

结果

在调整实践地点、小组规模、认证后年限以及按医生进行聚类后,对于接受有限时间或无限时间认证的内科医生所照顾的患者,任何绩效指标的结果都没有差异:结直肠癌筛查(比值比[OR],0.95[95%可信区间,0.89-1.01]);糖化血红蛋白水平低于 9.0%的糖尿病(OR,0.96[95%可信区间,0.74-1.2]);血压控制(OR,0.99[95%可信区间,0.69-1.4]);LDL-C 水平低于 100mg/dL(OR,1.1[95%可信区间,0.79-1.5]);血压低于 140/90mmHg 的高血压(OR,1.0[95%可信区间,0.92-1.2]);噻嗪类药物使用(OR,1.0[95%可信区间,0.8-1.3]);LDL-C 水平低于 100mg/dL 的动脉粥样硬化性冠心病(OR,1.1[95%可信区间,0.75-1.7]);心肌梗死后使用阿司匹林(OR,0.98[95%可信区间,0.58-1.68])或β受体阻滞剂(OR,1.0[95%可信区间,0.57-1.9]);心力衰竭(CHF)使用 ACE 抑制剂(OR,0.98[95%可信区间,0.61-1.6])。

结论和相关性

在 4 家 VA 医疗中心提供初级保健的内科医生中,在 10 项初级保健绩效指标中,有限时间 ABIM 认证和无限时间 ABIM 认证的医生之间没有显著差异。在非 VA 和非学术环境中,对有限时间和无限时间证书持有者的患者结局差异以及与其他 ABIM 目标的关联进行额外研究,可能有助于阐明维持认证参与的潜在益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验